Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think if GB (great initials for a visitor) was a 'guy' then Nette would have to have a serious word about fashion - 3" heels on men are so last decade.


There are women well over 6' here - but they are usually German tourists or Comedians.


A lot of ED bars let you run up a tab if you put your cc behind the bar.


This is really all you need to know.

Well this certainly went in the wrong direction!

*Lets clarify: Yes I am female. A chick, a broad, dame, lass, beaver, etc... (example attached)

*Sorry, I didnt mean to imply everyone there is short. My brother, in his own way of tormenting me said "You know youre going to tower over everyone there, right? Everyone will be eye level with your boobs, then what?." heh so I was just checking.

*Oh! And gingerbeer is a kind of soda (pop? I dont know what its called there), its actually really awful, but a friend of mine once said I was a tall glass of gingerbeer. I think he meant gingerale, in reference to my hair color (red) but I thought it was charming anyway so decided to adopt it as a screenname.



BTW the creme egg comment made me laugh!

You picked a mickname that will cause some members to think that you are as we say: "A Ginger Beer"

Either you are havinng us on a line or you really dont know what it means,

So.


Gingerbeer is a London-based virtual community for lesbian and bisexual women.

It is a Cockney Rhyming slang.


You could change to;

Gooseberry Puddin'

Try this link.


http://www.cockneyrhymingslang.co.uk/slang/G


Nice to see you on the Pistol and Shooter.

I will give you a Pot of Glue

So you are very Bat and Ball.

And given a home to two Postman Pats.

I think the original quote by your friend Tallglassofgingerbeer would be fine.


And don't worry about fitting in - people around here have become quite tolerant of 'gingahs' and have even stopped pointing.


And if anyone tries to crowbar in a pun about crabbies don't fret - it's gingerbeer with a kick.




*expects 'crabbies' will not be new forum name*

Here are two things that might actually be useful to you, language-wise. What you call pants, the British call trousers.In Britain pants are underpants. So, for example, if you say to a British colleague that you like her pants, she will wonder how you know what her knickers look like and why you are being rather personal. Being British, she is unlikely to say anything about it, or explain your mistake. She will just look at you a bit oddly and let you go on to make the same mistake again and again. Similarly, what you call a fanny, the British call a bum or bottom. In Britain, a fanny is a front bottom, so avoid remarks like, "Oh my fanny aches after sitting down for so long" as you will be thought to be providing just a bit too much information.

I think Ill have to stick with Gingerbeer... thats alright, Ive lived in Boys Town in SD for years, so Im used to people thinking Im a lesbian. There are worse things in life.


Hah! Good to know about the pants! Living in San Diego, I picked up the word "chonies" for underwear. maybe that will force the issue as to what Im referring to. Although Id like to think I wont be talking about anyones underwear-- but things get weird sometimes. I dont think there exists too much rhyming slang in the US, unless youre in prison. And regarding the list of expressions Bob gave, I cant even imagine how I would work any of those into a conversation without sounding like a complete whack job!


Back to my stick-shift question, it didnt come out right when I posted it. This is something Ive wondered about for a long time (maybe I have too much time on my hands!) Do they look like:

1 3 5

2 4 R


OR



5 3 1

R 4 2

Gingerbeer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I cant even imagine how I

> would work any of those into a conversation

> without sounding like a complete whack job!


It's easy!


My husband's was a bit of berkshire hunt last night. I've only just got over a case of the two bob bits so fancied a friar tuck. Instead, he ruffled my rubiks cubes and harry monked all over my thrupenny bits.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...