Jump to content

Buying my neighbour's back garden


Bob Buzzard

Recommended Posts

Mrs Bob says we need to expand more - in our double fronted 5-bed we've already done the loft, extended out to the side, added a conservatory and tanked the cellar, so I thought about enlarging our garden by buying our neighbour's adjacent back garden. I have asked them to sell it to us for ?10000, but they have said no. I don't know why because they don't use it much - they only seem to sit in it during the summer months and only cut their grass every 3 weeks or so. I know they need the money because I see them go out to work every day. I did think getting a compulsory purchase order, but my mate Mick down The Castle says I can't do that? Shall I up my offer to ?15k instead?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob Buzzard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Steady on - it's a reasonable proposition isn't

> it?


It depends bob. Is it theirs to sell? Do they have a mortgage? If so your ?15k could disappear down the drain.


But I?m sure you?ve done due diligence despite an uncharacteristic lack of judgement wasting money on artisan butter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you enclose it with a 10 ft wall ,access only possible via your garden and use it for about 12 years you would get ownership by adverse possesion .


Would suggest you get wall built while they are out at work ,have one of those "wraps" that replicate the orginal installed to the rear of their house and they'll never notice or challenge the land grab .


This lot https://graphics.cunninghamcovers.co.uk/building-wrap do stuff on the scale I think you'll need .


And don't overlook the potential of air rights in your quest to improve your home .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop trying to aggressively deprive someone of their garden. Compulsory purchase order? get in the sea. Besides, it sounds like your house is big enough.



You also sound like you'd be a pain in the arse to live beside, although im half convinced this post is simply taking the piss to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob, I think you should use Mrs Bob's considerable charms on your neighbours and invite them round for an evening soir?e. Think Abigail's Party, Pampass Grass by the front door, car keys thrown in the Aalvo Aalto glass bowl on your mid-century sideboard, then loosen things up with a rum punch, followed by a hot sticky fondue with suggestively shaped crudit?s. They'll soon be eating out of your hands...quite literally!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bob Buzzard Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Steady on - it's a reasonable proposition isn't

> > it?

>

> It depends bob. Is it theirs to sell? Do they have

> a mortgage? If so your ?15k could disappear down

> the drain.

>

> But I?m sure you?ve done due diligence despite an

> uncharacteristic lack of judgement wasting money

> on artisan butter.


Good point - I?d forgotten some people have mortgages and that you can't seek bits of a property if it?s mortgaged. I thought they just didn?t like me and were just saying no to me, but it?s probably because their mortgage Ts&Cs prevents them from selling their garden to me - how disappointing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think if you enclose it with a 10 ft wall

> ,access only possible via your garden and use it

> for about 12 years you would get ownership by

> adverse possesion .

>

> Would suggest you get wall built while they are

> out at work ,have one of those "wraps" that

> replicate the orginal installed to the rear of

> their house and they'll never notice or challenge

> the land grab .

>

> This lot

> https://graphics.cunninghamcovers.co.uk/building-w

> rap do stuff on the scale I think you'll need .

>

> And don't overlook the potential of air rights in

> your quest to improve your home .


?Adverse possession? is that a real thing? Could I do that? I don?t want to cause any bother. The other thing I thought about was a shepherd?s hut in my garden with a log burner? Plus I?m also planning to get a brick pizza oven built in the garden (my garden, not the neighbour?s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why not go the whole hog and make an offer on the

> house and garden? You could then resell the house

> without the garden.


That?s also a good idea I hadn?t thought of yet, it?s just one of those terraced houses on Glengarry Road so I could afford to buy it, but I?m not sure Mrs Bob would like me spending all that cash just to buy an additional bit of garden, but maybe she could be persuaded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could start up a campaign on intimidation, perhaps? 'encourage' them to bow to your demands. Check with Mick down at The Castle whether he knows any Millwall fans that have spare time on a Saturday afternoon, now they are banned from going within 2 miles of the New Den on match days.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No idea. Ask One Dulwich   No. There are two seperate issues. I believe some cover their plates deliberately (delivery drivers etc) and a number are confused by signage. I spend a lot of time in that area and have only ever seen one car drive through and it was an elderly couple who were incredibly confused (and subsequently very apologetic to an angry cyclist who was calling them all the names under the sun).   Some questions for you to answer now: 1) Which consultation are you referring to? 2) Did you agree with the council's insistence on keeping the junction closed to emergency vehicles despite the emergency services telling them it was delaying response times?   3) At a time of funding crisis do you think £1.5m is a good spend to redesign a junction and those redesigns: - potentially increase emergency vehicle response times - do nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders - do nothing to slow cyclists at a pedestrian area  
    • I tell you what, I've answered every question you've posed to me on this thread so far, so before you deflect any further, why don't you address the simple questions I've put to you several times first. Here, give them a go: Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Do you genuinely believe that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the square due to inadequate signage?  
    • Which original consultation?    Err be careful with the expert opinion and data part.....if you think the cycle lobby and Aldred et al is the sole source of sound opinion on such issues! 😉 And this is where they fell foul of the law and had to re-run the consultation. It actually casts huge doubt on a lot of previous consultations (including the latest DV one) as they do not pass the legal watermark because they do not provide a yes/no response. The council are terrified of a judicial review because, I suspect under legal advice, they know they cheated the system in many previous consultations. Do you remember when the council claimed they had a mandate for the CPZs because of some seriously dodgy research conducted with a large tranche of students in the north of the borough in 2018.....
    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void. The criteria for LTNs was high population density, high public transport usage and low car ownership so Dulwich Village was a perfect candidate…not. Just a coincidence but I believe some councillors live within the scheme 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...