Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been amused by many of my liberal friends going on about letting him rot in jail, throw away the key etc...and the blokes not even had a trial yet*


Creepy ozzie liberal= "Not Guilty"

Hacking tory= "Guilty"


like pavlov's mutts


* to be clear not ALL of my liberal friends and I 'suspect' he's guilty too but double standards or what shocker

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've been amused by many of my liberal friends

> going on about letting him rot in jail, throw away

> the key etc...and the blokes not even had a trial

> yet*

>

> Creepy ozzie liberal= "Not Guilty"

> Hacking tory= "Guilty"

>

> like pavlov's mutts

>

> * to be clear not ALL of my liberal friends and I

> 'suspect' he's guilty too but double standards or

> what shocker


Thing is ???'s


Liberals or not 'people' want Coulson to be guilty, in as much as they want that guilt projected onto the present government


Because if Coulson is guilty


Then Cameron is is guilty


If Coulson is a c-nut


Then Cameron is a C-NUT


All the more, there's a 'need' to stick something to Cameron, specially after his handling (rightly/wrongly) of the whole Jezzer Hunt saga


Netts

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They have cheese now as Heritage cheese has closed down 
    • Heritage Cheese is just around the corner though in the village
    • There are moves to place Thames Water into a SAR (Special Administration Regime) effectively renationalising it and wiping out its debt.  But then what ?  There is also rumours of lookmg for a new owner, including a Chinese backed group that already owns Northumbrian water and UK power.  Is that a controversial move as it places another of our inferstructural assets in foreign hands?  Should it be renationalised and run as a not for profit government organisation, placing investment and improvements before  shareholders? This in itself would adversely impact pension funds who have invested in utilities.  Its fairly obvious that Thames Water needs rescuing or restructure but what is the optimum and correct path to take ?   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...