Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've never spent much time on Facebook at all - even before work blocked it


I appreciate what it does but 2 things have caused me to think about closing my account


1) - the article highlighted at the start of the thread didn't contain any surprises - but it did make me reflect

2) - it was fine when it was a clean space but since everyone is busy sending sparkling new year messages and all the flim flam mini apps, and then al lteh adverts, it's now even messier than Myspace - and that is saying something


oh but wait it's impossible close and account - sheeeeeeit

For photo sharing Flickr is infinitely better, plus you get to license your photos whereas Facebook claim ownership on anything that's posted on their site.

As a nice but nisguided girl has been uploading my ED photos on to it as hers, without my permission, I'm less than thrilled.

I haven't taken any action as basically I'm not convinced anyone ever looks at facebook groups.


*edited fior resolution*

I too had a brief affair with the book of faces. After about a month the novelty wore off but I still check it once a week or so. I really don?t see the point of all the crap people keep sending me though?!?


So far the only real use has been organising my wedding in South Africa especially as all my friends and family are dotted around the 4 corners of the world.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As some naughty East Dulite girl has been

> uploading my ED photos on to it as hers, without

> my permission, I'm less than thrilled.

> I haven't taken any action as basically I'm not

> convinced anyone ever looks at facebook groups.


Irrespective of who's viewing it this is copyright theft, and if I were you I'd suggest you get onto facebook about it. They need to be made aware that this has occurred. IF anyone did the same with mine I'd unleash tamed lawyers...

Adie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you don't like it don't use it, why are people

> getting upset?



I'm not on Facebook, but a lot of people I know are (including Mr J who assures me it's essential for his studies, but spends most of his time playing chess with my brother. But I digress..)and what bothers me is that people post group photos including me and insist on "tagging" them. So, there are pictures out there labelled with my full name that I haven't chosen to post and that I have no control over. It's not that I have anything to hide particularly, it just feels a bit invasive.


Also, I also think people on Facebook very quickly forget just how public it is, something that I think also happens on here sometimes, and boundaries become a bit blurred. I recently moved jobs and before I started someone form my new job posted on the Facebook group for my old workplace basically asking if I was any good. Personally, I think asking fellow professionals to voice their opinions on a colleague on a public forum is completely unprofessional and inappropriate.


So, there are two examples of ways I'm affected by Facebook even though I choose not to use it. Not the end of the world, but certainly annoying.


Edited for spelling.

I joined facebook and it was good at first to get in touch with some old friends. However I also had a lot of requests from randoms -ie someone i worked with years ago and am no longer in touch with (was barely a friend of mine when we worked together!) - requests like that started to annoy me as people were just adding to their 'friend count'.


Then i got people tagging me in photos and i started to get a bit fed up of it all.


annaj i totally agree with the point you made that people forget how public it is -some of my friends on there had their addresses, birthdays, cities, some even phone numbers. it's an awful lot of information to have on a very public space.


so i comitted facebook suicide and deactivated my account - much happier not being a part of that 'community'

missd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


i totally agree with the point you made that

> people forget how public it is -some of my friends

> on there had their addresses, birthdays, cities,

> some even phone numbers. it's an awful lot of

> information to have on a very public space.


Quite simple..don't put any of that information up. Otherwise you're asking for trouble. Identity theft etc etc.

missd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I joined facebook and it was good at first to get

> in touch with some old friends. However I also had

> a lot of requests from randoms -ie someone i

> worked with years ago and am no longer in touch

> with (was barely a friend of mine when we worked

> together!) - requests like that started to annoy

> me as people were just adding to their 'friend

> count'.

>

> Then i got people tagging me in photos and i

> started to get a bit fed up of it all.

>

> annaj i totally agree with the point you made that

> people forget how public it is -some of my friends

> on there had their addresses, birthdays, cities,

> some even phone numbers. it's an awful lot of

> information to have on a very public space.

>

> so i comitted facebook suicide and deactivated my

> account - much happier not being a part of that

> 'community'


You can never delete facebook - just put it into hibernation...

true - i know my info is still in there - however, it's some photos and my hometown -i'm just happy that i'm no longer being tagged and poked, karate kicked or offered drinks that i cant actually drink!!


i didnt have any of my personal information up. can't understand why anyone would put up all that informaton up - totally right jah lush -identity theft is a real problem. if someone could convince some call centre worker that they were the chairman of Barclays with something like his address and date of birth, then that's enough information for a whole host of trouble.

In my opinion, facebook is represented by the number of 'friend' requests I get from people I havent heard from or seen since I was at primary or secondary school, some twenty odd years ago. I believe these people wish to claim me as a friend merely to make up the numbers on their profile page, as they seemingly have no interest in any further communication. Quite sad.

I got a friend request form a guy with my last name, and stupidly accepted it. He then invited me to loads of groups like "Clarkson Rules", "Petrolheads", "Need for spped" and other such nonsense.


I politely informed him that I don't drive or give a flying f**k about cars. Haven't heard from him since.

Gerrard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In my opinion, facebook is represented by the

> number of 'friend' requests I get from people I

> havent heard from or seen since I was at primary

> or secondary school, some twenty odd years ago. I

> believe these people wish to claim me as a friend

> merely to make up the numbers on their profile

> page, as they seemingly have no interest in any

> further communication. Quite sad.


There is probabaly a reason why you didnt stay in touch anyway

I keep on getting friend request from people that I don't know but who are from my home town. I do not display my home town on my profile so I can only assume that I have met/known these people at some time in my past and just can't remember them.


Problem is that it is quite a small town and you don't want to offend anyone because the chances are that next thing that person is married to your best mate or teaching your child at school or something.

embellina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree it's annoying but you can untag the pics

> of you, which I do for particularly horrible ones!


Fine, only I can't because I'm not on Facebook. MrJ has untagged a few, but people put the names back on. It's not even that any of the pictures I've seen are particularly bad, my embarassingly drunk days are mostly behind me, it's just that I'd prefer to have control over where my full name is published.

I like Facebook but don't use my own name - not even PeckhamRose before you look - and I tell friends I am hooking up with who I am and delete any photos people hook me up with. It is useful for knowing what is going on in music or some event like a theatre and so on as people can create a group for that particular play. I know it can give one (not me, of course) a reason to be more paranoid if you find you have not had a poke for a week..... or wondering why no-one has written on your wall.... but then we're addicted to the net and emails, aren't we? What DID they do before telephones by the way?

I joined as I'd had a few (well 3) requests to join from 2 friends and errr.. my sister.


When I logged on, my friend had a picture of a man doing something unmentionable to his arse and I quickly decided I didn't need my little sis knowing what sort of friends I have and removed my account.

Thanks.

What WAS the worst spelling error?

PeckhamRise?

Ummmm

Nope, can't imagine.


and cdonline you could have just deleted that friend!



SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like your thinking PeckhamRose

>

> edited for worst spelling error possible

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...