Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Strictly speaking nationalism is all about unifying a nation, its just that these days we're rather more aware at what cost that comes and how narrow or exclusive the concept of nation can be.

Whats interesting here is that neither British nor Scottish nationalism is mutually exclusive, but I rather feel the brand that the SNP is peddling, is!!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am hoping that a lot of poeple will vote based

> on personality, which surely means they'll vote

> "against" Salmond.


Not if it's seen to be an alternative to voting against Cameron. The whole thing has been turned into a Nationalistic rant of 'Get those Tory bastards at Westminster oot of our country!" and that might just work.

Agree Maxxi.In the Indie at the weekend there was 'comment' piece by a Scottish QC


That basically was saying 'you are a laughing stock; you're London spivs made us go bust three(?) times blah, blah. blah - just a ridiculous anti-english rant


Especially when the biggest two bank responsible for the banking crisis in the UK where: The Royal Bank of Scotland whose executive and board sat in edinboro under that well known 'cokernee wide boy' Sir Fred; HBOS (guess whwat the BOS stands for? hint Bank of Sc*tland - where the biggest problems were the corporate property loans dished up by the BoS bit based in Edinboro.


Added to which the unsuatsinable idiotic increase in public spending post 2007 was under the stewradship of that well know one eyed englishman. Gordon Brown.


Maybe the monaing gits* should go


*Numbers, So help me bobby, MrB and Snorks can be given honourary English Citizenship

What do we call ourselves once they do the frank?


British as opposed to Britons was really coined for that union. A lot of people who considerd themselves British may struggle to think of themselves as English, especially if you're Welsh or Irish, neither of which are really full nations in the Union, the 'kingdom' of Ireland left ages ago and wales, well, that was conquered and absorbed 800years ago so never really feautured as part of the union anymore than say, shropshire.


British was an idea, English smacks of that exclusivity thing, more easily defined and 'defended' by kippers, EDLers and the like.


Ukish "Youkish"? rUKan?

I remember the results for Devolution - the No vote led

all night until a huge number of yes votes from the Carmarthen

area won it 50.1 to 49.9.


Now most Welsh people agree, the Assembly isn't to bad.


El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's not to say Wales won't be independent again

> of course, i can see that happening. They may be

> overwhelmingly against the idea now, but

> historical momentum has a habit of being, well,

> momentous, or should that be moving?

> I still get to be Irish, right?


Thinking about it, I definitely feel British despite being an immigrant, I could probably describe myself as English as certainly that's where I've lived ahuge chunk of my life, where my opinions were formed, where I was mostly schooled.

But I don't think I'd ever think of myself as Irish no matter how long I live here, and that seems to accord with how people feel about immigrants here.

oh im way less Spanish than british/english, as i said i feel more british than english, and feel a bit sad that that may be lost now.

Though if i had to pick one it's obviosuly be english as you point out Otta; despite my mums side all being scotch type people, well them and the boche and yanks and stuff.

I've always thought of us all (English, Irish, Scots, Welsh) as British Islanders. No matter what the flags or politics, we are all inhabitants of the British Isles and thinking of ourselves as Islanders goes some way to explaining what we have in common (with each other and, say, Iceland?) i.e. a suspicion of the mainland and them thar ways.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi that all sounds great, but if you speak to a

> resident of the Shetland Islands who

> geographically and culturally speaking has more in

> common with Oslo than it does Edinburgh then this

> argument starts to fall apart.

>

> Louisa.



Cultural differences arise from the influence the mainland has had, historically, on the Isles and are what make our island group what it is.


A Cornishman may have more in common with his Norman counterpart and an East Anglian may feel kindred spirit with the Dutch - geographically they are both (as is this Shetlander) British Islanders - that's what I meant about politics and flags aside.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...