Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes of course asking for tenders on the 3rd biggest mortgage lender in the uk, analysing what's on the table, negotiating, thinking about the direction of the global economy, should only take a couple of weeks huh! christ and he's had nearly 20.


They should just take decisions quickly regarding the economy, and think of the political capital just like the Conservative divs with there slide rule calculators in the late 80's....any one for a pint of ERM !

Its ashame Dick didnt get the bank, the govt will make a killing when they reflote it a few years down the line. I , like many others bought in on the low end as it was spiralling down and have lost several grand, at least there will be compensation for shareholders.

1) No. Banks need a commercial driver to work effectively.


2) Darling is not great. But any chancellor who takes over before a downturn would be slated anyway. He'll be quietly sidelined in a summer reshuffle. And I think we all had a part to play in the downturn...who actually thought their 3 bed terrace was really worth ?670,000?! Our greed seems to get the better of us every 7 years...

Michael thats very true, the rock will do well long term, current shareholders wont though (RAB capital must be fuming), current govt has not really proved itself so far though (naming and shaming of nrk). Richard Branson would have been good for the rock and its borrowers.
I know a shareholder who's losing a sizeable pile on this as their shares become worthless. They bought on the advice of a fund manager who advised (last year) that a better spread should include more stable banking stock ala Northern Rock. Now other speculators who bought stock in the last couple of weeks in anticipation of RB succeeding will also lose everything. I wonder if the next chapter on this farce will be a legal battle with the disenfranchised shareholders?

I don't have much sympathy with the shareholders, I'm afraid. It's a known risk ("value of shares can fall as well as rise..." etc) and this time they lost out.


The people I feel sorry for are those whose pensions may be affected.


As for the success of nationalised industries...50/50. Some do well, some private comanies make a cock-up of it and its worse than before. Time will tell, I suspect.

Spadetownboy, as we've piled in from the public purse something to the tune of 500 quid for every man woman and child so far, I'd be pretty concerned about what happens to it all.


I mean, we could probably get another trident submarine for that, or 2 nonfunctioning NHS IT systems, or you know, modernise 1000 hospitals....naa that'd be daft!!

  • 6 months later...

So, given the latest news


This one nothing to Do with Alistair Darling or whelk stalls


Can libertarians answer the question:


Just why is it that the 2 governments most closely aligned with the free market and libertarian ideals (at least compared with any serious contenders) both feel the need to nationalise these banks?

From what I've read before they are government chartered banks and formerly government owned and they provide funding for about 50% of the home loans market.


No matter how libertarian their views, no government could stand by and let them fail - the impact on the economy would be devestating, and of course they'd be booted straight out at the next election. (Perhaps cynically, I think what most government care about the most, whatever their policies, is staying in power.)

Whatever the flaws, and I can't think of a better system, it is the paradox at the heart of any democracy


History has shown that at times of change/need/cause/whatever - leadership has had to do things that would be deemed unpopular. But so led are we by "opinion polls" and fear of being voted out I blame the electorate far more than any political party for the paralysis of any true thought in government

Not sure I agree. The electorate doesn't really get that much say anyway - there's nothing to ensure that any politician you vote for even follows what they've said in their party manifesto.


It's not like the Swiss system where you get to vote locally regularly on issues rather than for a certain party in the hope that on balance they will best respresent your beliefs and interests over the next 4-5 years.

The electorate has far more say than they want


Elect your MP of choice and then make sure they know who you are. No point electing someone and then sitting back for 4-5 years. As a population we is well lazy


Not sure i fancy living in Switzerland either ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...