Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it would have been fairer if they gave the option to pick it up and dispose of it in the proper manner whilst giving you a strong warning.


Yes I appreciate they were quite clearly making an example out of the whole thing but as already mentioned on this thread the "finers" didn't target everyone else along LL at the same time.

Mark


I get my information from the kids that get mugged. Each day, I hear from another parent that their son or daughter has been mugged......its been going on for years, and unfortunately parents from these schools have resorted to driving their kids everywhere. What a shame.

Roughly 4 months ago, there were at least 6 of these wardens and at least the same number of police officers outside Bermondsey tube station giving out fines to those who had to have their last cigarette before boarding a tube. It was 8am and they made a killing that day, pity the police weren`t out in the street doing something more important :'(

Mark -


I agree with Gerry. Some of us can think outside the box. My friend has been picked on THREE TIMES this week trying to walk from the bus stop to her house (about a 10 min walk). She has spoken to the police who seem totally disinterested.


It just made me think that effort is being put into the wrong thing. For example, has the council thought about doing something to calm down the traffic on LL, or will they wait until someone is run down? Have they confronted the kids that loiter outside the newsagent by the playground on ED road - where I was treatened with a knife after refusing to give a kid 50p!!

What was so irritating is a bunch of

> blokes were accross the road chain smoking and

> slinging their butts - I guess the little weazle

> was too scared of them!


The old English student came out in me when I read that. "A bunch of blokes"... "chain smoking" ... not just placing their butt-ends on the ground but "slinging" them! Bloody hell - they were horrible louts littering our streets, weren't they? Not like you - you were smoking a cigar, waiting for your sister - terribly respectable, very reasonable.


Fact is you broke the rules and you paid the price literally. I don't like littering. Full stop. It's the behaviour we are talking about here. Not you, not the blokes across the street. And it was the behaviour that warranted the fine.


You know, I used to smoke, and I used to drop cigarette butts everywhere. And then once in Richmond this incredibly posh woman said in a really really loud voice "You dirty girl" as my cigarette butt hit the floor. I was embarrassed, angry and slightly ashamed. But I learnt my lesson.


ps. I wouldn't actually advise people to use the phrase "you dirty girl" to strangers in public - there are perhaps more appropriate ways to address the problem. Perhaps like a ?75 fine.

I don't have a box myself so I'm not sure what you're talking about.


Anyway as I mentioned on your other thread about your friend being picked on, there is the Safer Neighbour Hood team, they deal with things like that, so there is effort being put into the right thing. I'll copy and paste it here again:


Safer Neighbourhood police teams - taken from http://www.southwark.gov.uk/YourCommunity/Dulwich/lookingafterDulwich.html


"There are three Safer Neighbourhoods police teams in Dulwich in addition to other policing teams. Each team is made up of six police and Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs). Their aim is to find out what affects your daily life and feelings of security and help find lasting solutions to these problems.


Teams are permanent ... See this site http://www.met.police.uk/saferneighbourhoods/ for more details"


Put this number in your phone: East Dulwich Ward Safer Neighbourhood Team Tel: 020 8721 2447, they're good for reporting non-police type incidents to.


I hope that helps

BellendenBelle,

I share your horror of littering. When appropriate, your shaming idea is worth a go. It's so mucb better than silent seething or passive aggressive behaviour. I also think that when I pick up cans and bottles from teh street, a subliminal message is received by people, who might think twice about littering in the future.

But I also feel sympathy with seanmlow's view that the wardens are less likely to pick on a group of men in Camberwell, or go looking for 'victims' outside a pub.

Nero

Once again the point has been missed.


What I don't like is the fact I was singled out, on a street FULL OF SMOKERS - e.g. the guys opposite. If you are going to fine me, do it, but don't just walk past other offenders!


It is clear he was nervous as he was stuttering. If they want to put these baffoons on the street then they can't pick and choose who to fine. Surely a rule is a rule if we want to stop the littering?


No, instead they pick on a guy on his own on his mobile. Easy target, unlikely to react badly.


I think they may be in for a shock soon - one of these days they will get nutted!

Given that people get mugged and given that some muggers do get caught, do you think the ones that get caught say "it's not fair! Most of the other muggers get away with it - I hardly EVER mug anyone and the one time I do I get nabbed!!"

seanmlow Wrote:

>

> I think they may be in for a shock soon - one of

> these days they will get nutted!


They're working around that. Face recognition software and the nice biometric identity cards will make patrols unnecessary, and they'll get a robot to hand out fines.


That, I hope, will free our hard-working PCSOs from their social control responsibilities and enable them to offer real community support - telling people the time, hauling old folk across roads and generally keeping an eye out for criminal nonsense - what Plod used to do before they learnt to love paperwork and shoot Brazilians.


In the meantime, the War Against Behaviour is being fought by whoever's cheapest. It's now a whole decade since Blair announced his cashpoint plan for tramps, and yet there are still people drinking and smoking and whistling in the street. In other circumstances we'd probably have the military involved by now, but in their absence the PCSOs are the next best thing, especially given the difficulties in recruiting Specials

Sean, life can be so unfair. Lordship Lane is a tough place, especially that patch outside Somerfields where all kinds of hazards are waiting to pounce on the unsuspecting. I've known life long ED residents who wince at the thought of standing there.


But look at the positive side.


At least you're not having to write a whinging thread about being run over by a buggy pushed by a stuttering nanny.

maybe unfair that you got fined so much immediately, without even a warning


however.....i am sure you might think twice before you throw a butt on the floor again.


and if it makes people think twice then that's a good thing (in my opinion of course).

I have just returned from a trip down Rye Lane shopping and opticians and stuff.


Whilst there I saw two Community Wardens (to give them their correct titles) and approached them about the subject de jour.


They said - if you pay within ten days it's ?50.

They are not stupid.

They told me they do not carry money around and so the fine was issued in the form of a ticket (like parking ticket) and if the person gives a false name or address they follow it up and obviously they are good at recognising faces.

They approach people who are not looking like they will attempt to kill them. If there is trouble they will call the police. If the police don't come because it's not a priority there's nothing they can do.

If you are asked for your name and address by someone in authority EVEN a community warden it is an offence to lie. Clearly you did not and you were fined.


For the information on Police Ward Panels of which I am a member and anyone can be in their locale if they can be arsed, you should come along and state your case.

Phone the safer neighbourhood team numbers given above and ask them for details of the one in your area.


Admin: I started a topic a while ago which I hoped would be a useful topic listing all the important such phone numbers of safer neighbourhood teams, police support community officers, ward panels and community councils and so on and hoped everyone would add to it and put relevant numbers in their phones. Could that topic be "stuck" to the top of the forum please? It just might be useful, that's all.


Good luck in your appeal, seanmlow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...