Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blimey Alicia, when I finished reading your post I had to grab it by the shoulders and shake it until it stopped being hysterical. Nice, that is, getting the rest of us all riled up and then nobbing off to a rural idyll.


Yo, Alicia! Chill! (As the young offenders would likely as not say).

Yeah Keef, I read through and nearly pissed my pants at thought all those ferel kids descending on East Dulwich. Normally I pack a rod in pyjamas but now I carry nothing but scars from Normandy Beach. Run for the Hills (Dog Kennel Hill, Forest or Herne Hill). Take yer pick.

I haven't been on this thread either much lately, but blimey, I'm open-mouthed to come across this c**p from Alicia. Scaremongering doesn't even start to describe it.


It's great to see the vast majority of posters on the thread have common sense and a heart.


Sooner she moves out of ED the better, it seems to me. Hope I never get to meet her in the meantime .....

Oh dear. This could very well signal the beginning of the end for the area.


Perhaps we (the community) should start some form of protest group or petition?


Has anybody contacted the local MP?


I wonder if Foxtons would be kind enough to host such a petition in their ample front office (but away from buyers, obviously!)? Prospective vendors could sign it when putting their property on the market.


Failing that, a wall could be erected at the periphery of LL with entrance controlled by some form of residents permit scheme.


Just a thought, like.

Jamma Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the administrator should lock down this

> thread until the facts of the matter can be

> established. No point in anyone getting hysterical

> if this is nothing more than rumour-mongering.

> Anyway, I'd rather live next door to a rapist than

> a Foxtons estate agent.



I've no idea who you are, Jamma....but that last commemt is disgusting. Keep thoughts like that to yourself. The forum has a wide cast net. You've not idea who you could upset.

Hey maybe they will steal the fence and melt it down for scrap ! actually thats a bleedin good idea,


(A) Fence gets removed at no cost to the tax payer

(B) Council get to claim insurance money

© council give insurance money to friends of goose green to redevelop the play area

(D) Youth offenders make a load of money for the scrap and use that to invest in decent Columbian nose pipe

(E) Youth offenders then supply decent Columbian nose pipery to the masses on lordship lane, now everyones happy !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...