Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Atila the gooner wrote:Barclays in my experience are rubbish at most things.


That is where we part company atila, Barclays are brilliant at charging for absolutely everything, for making it as difficult as possible to get your own money out of their clutches, and for trying to get hold of anyone of value to discuss your account problems.

only one way to get around it, have two cards. I have a switch/maestro for my current account and very rarely use it. i actually use a solo card for any transactions basically transferring cash onto the solo account, so that if the card is ever cloned theres only ever ?100-200 on it anyway
  • 3 weeks later...

I don't buy petrol or buy using debit card on the interweb or use internet banking (I use telephone banking), and my debit card has never been compromised in 20 years.


My company credit card was one of thousands compromised in the last Fasthosts debacle (thousands of customer details stolen) - HSBC rang to tell me before any loss occurred (they were clearly working their way through a list of hundreds of their own customers), then I had to get my card cancelled and another reissued, which was a pain as I was travelling at the time.


It makes sense not to store CC details on websites: if it's a large organisation, they'll have good defences and data protection but will be a major target for worldwide thieves 24/7. If they're small, their security and data protection may not be sufficient.

Someone took ?1,500 out on my cards - Eurostar to Paris, trip on the London Eye for 4, shopping spree in Mango all within 48 hours. Fortunatly I was living in Alaska at the time and FirstDirect knew this, so when I called in a panic they were really helpful and I was fully refunded within a week
  • 2 weeks later...

Scotslass, any ideas where your CC details were taken?


FD are generally very good although I noticed that last month they'd actually tried to defraud me on my CC statement.


I'd paid of the balance in full before the final date, yet a charge for interest appeared on the following statement. When I called to query it they said that there was a computer error and they were looking into it. Strange I thought. If I hadn't checked my statement I would've just paid the new balance and heard nothing from FD?!


If you use FD Visa I'd recommend you check your last statement.

Will get on and check the Visa as well.


Don't know how they cloned the card - got told they had used a card to withdraw cash in Germany!! Only ever seem to use it in Sainsburys or Somerfield so completely baffled how they managed it.


On another side to this, when I spoke to FD last night they put me on hold to go through to their Fraud Dept and ended up talking to someone in India. Found this out when I started asking questions that she didn't have answers too and got told 'Madam if you listen to me I am telling you the information'!! My response "but the information is not related to my question" (6)

My card was cloned at a certain ED petrol station a while back, and then used for a spending spree in Egypt. Thankfully RBS noticed before I did, and the money was refunded immediately. Needless to say that petrol station no longer receives our patronage, unless we're totally desperate and have cash!

Got a phone call from my Natwest bank the other day (they had to try twice because i thought it was a scam) to ask whether i had been using my card in United Arab Emirates.... which i hadnt been. Luckily, the criminal in question was declined twice from using the card, which is lucky. My card was canceled and i received a new one the next day.

Natwest are brilliant with some things it seems!


Anyway... ive never been to the Texaco garage...but it worries me that if this place is culpable then why is nobody aware/its shut down? seems all very casual to me.

OK folks here's the real deal: Banks cancel cards (even while you're on holiday!) to protect themselves and merchants, not you. You're not responsible for the fraud, which is why you always get your money back (eventually). The banks are responsible for wearing the debt temporarily and eventually the merchant that authorised the fraudulent transaction will wear the cost.


If the merchant (i.e. petrol station) wants to stop this kind of crap happening they will make sure their infrastructure is secure and they don't have dodgy employees swapping out their POS kit for modified versions that skim cards. They'll also make sure their CCTV camera's don't point at the POS device so PIN details can't be captured by the employees with access to the CCTV kit.


The police don't want to know about it because it would be a big waste of resource for something that would return them little reward. These operations are international and it would take massive cross-border cooperation to yield any sort of reward. The bottom line is that the merchants needs to get their houses in order, or they will end up paying the bill. Not the bank, and most importantly not you. I agree that the banks should refund your money to your account more quickly, as in most cases it will certainly not be your fault, however that's the only real issue for the consumer here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "2.2.1 The Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) has undertaken a comprehensive consultation process with its residents and stakeholders regarding the proposed development which aims to create 41 additional units and has been designed to address the growing demand for accessible and supportive accommodation for individuals with visual impairments. 2.2.2 The consultation process has been a key part of the planning phase, ensuring that the needs and preferences of current residents are taken into account. RNIB has held several meetings, workshops, and surveys to gather feedback on the design, facilities, and overall impact of the new development. Residents have been encouraged to share their views on various aspects, including accessibility features, communal spaces, and the integration of the new blocks with the existing infrastructure which has directly informed the proposals. 2.2.3 The Applicant also engaged with the local MP, Helen Hayes, and a couple of local councillors at the behest of RNIB tenants to provide new homes to promote independent living for its Blind and Partially Sighted residents"     Seems like a very sensible and necessary proposal to me.
    • Is this the home for the blind and partially sighted at the south end of Underhill? 
    • Sorry, yes, you can park but it's unlikely you will find a space. I meant to say 'you can't park with any certainty' - and if you go past Stradella Road getting back to where you can park is a bit of a bind.
    • Sound Lounge music venue windows smashed after altercation with those putting up flags.  Interesting comparison with another country in another time below https://insidecroydon.com/2025/09/08/suttons-sound-lounge-suffers-its-own-kind-of-kristallnacht/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...