Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with Dave. She told off Humphreys for going along with a Daily Mail "stitch up" and I thought she made her point well in the face of his questioning.

As mentioned above, she was doing it to 'muck in' with the people she was visiting, nothing more.

Move along now, nothing to see here.

nice MP we have - Voted for ID cards, Voted for teh Itraq War, voted against investigating the bungling behind the march to war and was well behind whatever punitive anti terrorism laws have been proposed of late. Oh, and wants to restock the Trident Nuke cupboard




Im not surprised she wears an anti stabbing vest.If I was here, i would be tempted to don a suit of armour every time I went out on public

To be honest, I'd rather she was being slagged off for being a useless, vacouus, self seeking, 'professional' politician *pukes, than a someone whose scared (or maybe not) of meeting the general public in her own constituency..either way, the fact that she has any influence on mine and my families life is deeply depressing...



ANARCHY

I take issue with her arse being fat.


don't know if I'm just in a bad mood today, but that's p*ssed me right off. she might be rubbish. she might be an idiot. she might be a warmongering, human-rights eroding proto fascist, but seriously, is the size of her arse relevant?


no wonder there are so few women in parliament.


body fascists

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...