Gross women

[TE44]

LM The chemicals regulatory directorate is funded 60% by

agrochemical industry, I thhink about ?7,000,000 that does not sit well with me.

Scientific studies and there findings have been ignored by goverment.

Sorry cant put up links now,I am not denying bans have been put in place

How they come about is a different matter.I do not want to go off cosmetic topic,

which is a concern but not a main concern for me,

[Huguenot]

TE44, 100% of the police force is paid for by British citizens - does that mean that they won't arrest you for a crime?

No.

This is an example of how your logic is flawed and you're listening to people with stupid ideas.

It is right and correct that the policing of the chemicals industry is paid for from the profits of the chemical industry.

Why should chemical manufacturers gets rich, whilst taxpayers like you (who typically have to count every penny) have to pay to stop them breaking the law?

THINK about it!

This doesn't make it corrupt, it makes it sensible.

The HSE is a publicly accountable body that is normally criticized for being 'nanny state' and 'too restrictive' - are you seriously claiming that it is now too soft?

This is really silly stuff.

[LondonMix]

The financial services industry has to pay (through a levy on certain activities) for bank deposit insurance. Industry often has to (through no choice of their own) fund things for public benefit related to the field. What exactly are you claiming the funding relationship is and why does it make you uncomfortable?

[dulwich2020]

WorkingMummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwich2020, or even Admin,

> Any chance you could change the title of this

> thread?

> The content of the OP was entirely unobjectionable

> as an expression of irritation, and nothing like

> as extreme as some of the views since expressed

> by, well, mainly by Louisa. But even Louisa has,

> at one point, distanced herself from the title.

> It's insulting.

> The thread is proving very popular and has been at

> or near the top of the board for a few days now.

> It is rather a slap in the face whenever you enter

> the lounge: "Gross women".

Hi

I did not mean the title to be insulting, and you can read it 2 ways. Woman are gross which is not what I mean, or its gross to watch woman personal grooming on public transport which is how I meants it. Its no worse than the TV program called LOOSE WOMAN. But if others agree I'm happy to change it although just like news headlines I think this title is what made this thread so popular

Exuse typos on the bus on BB

[kiera]

I'm not offended by the title of the thread - perhaps because I don't put on make-up on a bus! It's not a particularly pleasant title, but I don't consider you should feel pressured, (Dulwich 2020) into changing it.

[UncleBen]

Keep the title D2020, i now agree with it.

[Louisa]

I think the title should be 'inconsiderate foundations'

As a woman I too have no issue with the title, but I can appreciate why others would and it is somewhat unfortunate because it takes away from the seriousness of the subject matter.

I wonder does anyone know what the opinion of TfL is regarding cosmetics and use of other items on public transport?

Louisa.

[Voyageur]

Like the majority of sane and reasonable people, I shouldn't think they give a toss :) They have actual safety matters to deal with.

[RosieH]

This is the best mentalist thread I've seen on here in ages.

I put on make up on the bus, not because of my sloppy vagina (come on UncleBen, that's what you were really getting at with your loose morals comments, wasn't it?) but because I would rather spend an extra ten minutes in bed in the morning, breathing in the warm scent of my handsome man, thus seeing me off for my working day calm and happy, and altogether less likely to punch you repeatedly in your sexist face.

[Louisa]

RosieH there's no excuse for violence. The best way to get your own back on a "sexist man" is to spit in his dinner.

Louisa.

[Voyageur]

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RosieH there's no excuse for violence. The best

> way to get your own back on a "sexist man" is to

> spit in his dinner.

>

> Louisa.

But that's wholly unladylike!

http://andthatswhyyouresingle.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/scared-woman.jpg

[*Bob*]

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

The best

> way to get your own back on a "sexist man" is to

> spit in his dinner.

>

> Louisa.

Assuming you can get a restaurant reservation, of course

[Huguenot]

"RosieH there's no excuse for violence. The best way to get your own back on a "sexist man" is to spit in his dinner."

That's because in Louisa's worldview women remain in the kitchen ;-)

[*Bob*]

Or tamper with his pipe, perhaps.

[Louisa]

I spend most of my day in the kitchen. Opening bottles of wine and unpacking bottles of wine. So I guess, you're right Huguenot, in my context that is my worldview. Long may it continue!

Louisa.

[*Bob*]

Which wine does one drink with rabbit?

[Otta]

Wine bottles oft have long necks.

[UncleBen]

I do not wish to know about your sloppy vagina Rosie H *shudders*. You have proved my point though so thank you - you apply make up on public transport because of your sloppy attitude and would rather lay in bed than preparing for work/the day which is sloppy and lazy and reflects on you as it does others with the same mentality. The mentality in fact that is not liked by many posters on this thread.

[*Bob*]

Up and preparing for the day / in bed, shagging

Up and preparing for the day / in bed, shagging

No, I just can't decide..

[Voyageur]

Actually, Benny Boy, the boorish bad manners are sadly coming from you and your outdated patriarchal and mysogynistic attitudes :(

[Mick Mac]

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is the best mentalist thread I've seen on

> here in ages.

>

> I put on make up on the bus, not because of my

> sloppy vagina (come on UncleBen, that's what you

> were really getting at with your loose morals

> comments, wasn't it?) but because I would rather

> spend an extra ten minutes in bed in the morning,

> breathing in the warm scent of my handsome man,

You have a man Rosie! now this is cause to celebrate. Well done.

[*Bob*]

Eating chocolate cake / hitting myself in the face with a hammer

Eating chocolate cake / hitting myself in the face with a hammer

Crikey, this is more difficult than I thought..

[RosieH]

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You have a man Rosie! now this is cause to

> celebrate. Well done.

Ha, you didn't think anyone would have me, Mick? I'm right adorable, I am. Even when punching people in the face.

Caveated for Louisa - just to clarify, the only time I've ever punched someone in the face was when a rugby twat forcibly shoved his hand inside my underwear uninvited. Something UncleBen probably thinks is down to my sloppy morals.

I'd rather have my sloppy morals UncleBen, than your sloppy grammar. Your terrible command of the English language is really offensive to me. I'd suggest you probably have a sloppy IQ (*shudders*). But I'd be a bit less judgmental about it than you are.

Oh, and you also have terrible, and racist, taste in rice.

[*Bob*]

From make-up on buses to sex toys to racist rice.

And they said it couldn't be done..

[Louisa]

I've never come across racist rice, but I've come across over cooked rice before.

Louisa.