Jump to content

Recommended Posts

char1i3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I found the people in Green and Blue rude once so

> never went back in the six or so years that it has

> been on Lordship Lane. Good luck to the incoming

> people!

>

> Charlie


Me too - gave them a couple of chances but never even got a hello when I walked through the door, let alone help with my purchase. I wasn't surprised to see them fail. Hoping for something better this time.

Fancy- didn't I read they are opening a place in Battersea




El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's from the people who brought us Terroir and

> Brawn, so jolly exciting.

>

> G&Bs demise was sad, I think their troubles took

> their toll over the years and the final

> incarnation got the focus all wrong.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Think we need something more practical like a Greggs or BK. We don't need another pretentious independent shop to add to the rest of the shops aimed at only a small niche middle-class price range.


Louisa.

-------------------------------------------------------


There with you Louisa... maybe not a Burger King but an Iceland Farm shop (with restricted access for three wheel prams) would get my custom.

It's got to better than green and blue, I wanted to like it but the staff member who stood outside blowing smoke at me and my pram annoyed me on multiple occasions. The final straw was spending ?80 on a couple of bottles of wine and being told we don't do bags - don't worry I'll juggle them home

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If someone is spending ?80 on wine I think it

> would be reasonable to give them a cheap canvas

> bag.

>

> It's all very well having an environmental policy

> but if it puts people off shopping with you it's

> hardly good business.


^^

This!


(esp for impulse buyers like me who don't always take their shopping bags out with them and/or who decide on spur of moment to pick something up later in eve on way home - that was my exact experience.)

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> indiepanda Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If someone is spending ?80 on wine I think it

> > would be reasonable to give them a cheap canvas

> > bag.

> >

> > It's all very well having an environmental

> policy

> > but if it puts people off shopping with you

> it's

> > hardly good business.

>

> ^^

> This!

>

> (esp for impulse buyers like me who don't always

> take their shopping bags out with them and/or who

> decide on spur of moment to pick something up

> later in eve on way home - that was my exact

> experience.)


xxxxxxx


Same here - except I wasn't spending ?80!


If memory serves, they didn't even sell bags at one point - I asked them how I was supposed to carry the wine home and they more or less shrugged their shoulders. Can't now remember how I did get it home without dropping it :(


Environmentally friendly is all very well (and great to encourage people to use their own bags, as for example SMBS do), but not when it positively inconviences your customers.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair, it sounds like they listened to the

> feedback and started selling canvas bags... so

> shouldn't hold it against them.


good point (altho perhaps too little, too late. unless you were aware they'd started selling bags, there's already some lost custom not to mention negative feedback about it not to mention people who will happily spend 80 quid on decent wine but baulk at being asked to fork out more for a canvas bag to carry it home in!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • People already have....
    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...