Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not sure why so many people using this thread (about potential new business) to have a pop at g and b


I miss it. Bag policy or no (and I fell fouls of that more than once. I blamed myself not them tho )


Anyway. To the new business. Best of luck to whoever.

If it is the folks behinf Brawn, Terroir and Soif that's a puzzling move.


Were they not the food consultants for the menu changes that caused G&B so many problems? Not exactly a ringing endorsement of their food and price point.


Personally, I'm more than happy to see a new place open and will come to it open-minded but it's a strange turn of events if the rumours are true.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure why so many people using this thread

> (about potential new business) to have a pop at g

> and b

>

> I miss it. Bag policy or no (and I fell fouls of

> that more than once. I blamed myself not them tho

> )

>

> Anyway. To the new business. Best of luck to

> whoever.


am sure a lot of people posting here miss G&B strafer, it sold cracking wine not to found elsewhere. so not so much having a pop as realising others on here shared experiences in what they felt 'didn't work' from customer convenience perspective. now we've all seen its sad demise and people just hoping new owners don't make same mistakes & wishing them well of course.

Who on earth spends ?80 on a couple of bottles of wine? No wonder the member of staff was blowing smoke in your direction, they probably despised someone who spends more than a weeks food shopping money on wine alone. It's disgusting the amount of money that goes to waste when there are people on our doorsteps who need it. Please tell me that you regularly donate the equivalent to a worthwhile charity.

Chase Dulwit Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who on earth spends ?80 on a couple of bottles of

> wine? No wonder the member of staff was blowing

> smoke in your direction, they probably despised

> someone who spends more than a weeks food shopping

> money on wine alone. It's disgusting the amount of

> money that goes to waste when there are people on

> our doorsteps who need it. Please tell me that you

> regularly donate the equivalent to a worthwhile

> charity.


I doubt the staff in a specialist wine shop despise someone that spends ?80 on two bottles of wine - I always found the G&B staff extremely helpful when I wanted to purchase something special.


I find the implication that because an individual can afford to spend ?80 on wine they are disgusting and the implied threat that they might excuse such a decision by donating an equivalent sum to charity both naive and borderline offensive.

Chase Dulwit Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who on earth spends ?80 on a couple of bottles of

> wine? No wonder the member of staff was blowing

> smoke in your direction, they probably despised

> someone who spends more than a weeks food shopping

> money on wine alone. It's disgusting the amount of

> money that goes to waste when there are people on

> our doorsteps who need it. Please tell me that you

> regularly donate the equivalent to a worthwhile

> charity.



But it's ok to spend ?80 a month on tobacco?

If you think something has broken the rules of the forum then click on 'report this message' underneath the relevant post and it will go to the moderation team.


I don't think Chase Dulwit has done anything wrong there though - expressed disgust quite strongly may be, but even though it questions the values and perspectives of the wine buyer, it's not actually a personal attack is it?

El Phibe - If it's the Domain du Cros Marcillac you like, then I think Manish at Good Taste Food in Crystal Palace sells it. You can also order directly from Les Caves de Pyrene in Guildford (delivery can be pricy unless you are looking for a large order).
how very ed forum. someone mentions wine and then he gets torrent of abuse from the usual suspects about not paying lots of money for bottles of wine. many on here are so far up themelves and/or not taking their medication at the proper time that they feel a constant need to attack.
just get over yourselves you two and others. you don't even know you are doing it. a while ago someone posted about two yobs beating someone up in the park and was foolish enough to say they had a scary dog. she got told off for calling the dog scary, never mind the guy getting beaten up. on this thread some of you are worked up about a guy buying a couple of bottles of posh wine. try just for once to stick to the point. oh, forget it! waste of time even coming on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...