Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello

Saw one of the Lanes midwives out of the DMC this morning, was all set to ask for a referral to St Thomas' due to hearing a friend's horror stories about Kings and amazing birth experience at Tommy's, but I must admit that I loved the idea of the 'caseload care' system operated by the Lanes midwives, even started to contemplate having a homebirth and did a bit more research about Kings which really now doesn't seem that bad :)

Just wondered if anyone had anything positive or constructive to share about either hospital? I'll find out if I can get on the caseload care programme in the next fortnight. This would mean I can have all my midwife appts in my home, would always see the same one and that one would also attend to me in the early stages of labour and/or stay if I went for a homebirth. Obviously usual caveats around availbility etc.

Thanks for any thoughts in advance!

I had my son at Tommies and thought they were brilliant, I was classed as high risk due to Gestational Diabetes and Exercise induced anaphylaxis and I couldnt fault them and my labour went v smoothly. I didnt get to have my midwife appts at home which I really would have preferred but really felt I wanted to go to Tommies over Kings.


Saying that though I know people who have had their babies at Kings and have a good experience.


x

CocoC


I had my first baby at St T's 3 years ago, and my second at Kings in November.


I would definitely recommend Kings and caseload midwives over St T's, I was low risk first time, high risk second time and Kings were great, having a caseload midwife is also invaluable, feel free to PM me if you want more details.

Lanes midwives are fantastic, I had wonderful care from them and Kings for my 3 pregnancies. Personally I would always opt for the closer hospital, as in the event you have to attend lots of appointments (as I ended up doing), or having an extended stay, it's a lot easier if you don't have far to travel.

Just to add - for my 1st two babies Lanes were only just being set up, so I went to them at DMC for my appointments. For #3, having the midwife visit me at home felt like absolute luxury, and they really went the extra mile for me when I needed weekly blood tests, doing them all at home for me rather than me having to go to Kings or Dulwich hospital.


Erika, in particular, was brilliant when it came to helping me through a pregnancy related illness, and really helped me to manage the condition and avoid spending too much time in hospital. Through an induction process which drew out for days (and days and days... Never believe anyone who tells you 3rd babies just fall out!) both she and the other Lanes midwives were never far away, popping in to say hello anytime they were in the ward. Through an extremely stressful time she really helped make the birth experience (when it finally happened) a positive one.


We are very lucky to have this resource on our doorstep. My friends in the US and NZ can't believe I got it for free!

I've given birth at both hospitals. Medical issues for both myself and the unborn babies making the pregnancies higher risk, i found Tommy's the better of the two. Also my first two pregnancies (birthed at Kings) i was cared for by the Lanes Midwives and i would still go for Tommies, but there were difficult circumstances (can give you details privately)

miss Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does booking in at Tommy's mean giving up Lanes

> care? If so, I'd stick with King's all the way -

> my experience of the Lanes has been superb.



Yes booking at Tommy's would mean giving up care by the Lanes team, I still opted for Tommy's third time round. I recieved outstanding care at Tommy's far better than i got at King's for my second pregnancy. Although the care i got from King's with my first pregnancy from Prof Nikolades and the other consultants was excellent. Both hospitals have pros and cons, it really depends on what your individual needs are.

I can't recommend the caseload system enough. People pay thousands to have similar care from independent midwives (or have done until the law changes) and these have the added bonus of being King's midwives who can deliver at the hospital and liaise with the staff there.


This is my second pregnancy with Oakwood and they have been brilliant both times. This time round I was diagnosed with GD and they have supported me throughout. I am now in the final stretch and hoping excitedly for a second home birth with them. The GD has meant I've seen quite a bit of the King's doctors too this time round and the consultant has been great to deal with, and facilitated the choices I've made rather than stuck rigidly to protocol. My niggle with Kings is that they are very quick to medicalise and their research and teaching status means they are sometimes too ready to see problems. But I imagine that in many circumstances that is a good thing, and as Tommy's is exactly the same sort of hospital, presumably the same attitude prevails there.

Thanks so much guys, this is all excellent. I guess I will decide as/when I know if I'm able to access the Lanes midwives caseload care. I'm not anticipating any complications/ difficulties but I'm very newly pregnant (still south of 12 weeks) and this is a pregnancy achieved after three rounds of IVF (incidentally, two of which were at Kings and failed, the last one at another private clinic which worked), so this is all a) utterly baffling to me and b) I feel terribly pressured to make the right choice now I have the luxury of making that choice, if you know what I mean!

Congratulations! Take your time and make your decision. I was with the Lanes and they were fantastic. I had a few bumps along the road both antenatal and postnatal and the midwives were outstanding. Vanessa in particular went over and above her duty and was constantly by my side or a phonecall away. I still miss having her around and she gave me so many words of wisdom that have helped during the first year of motherhood.


I was at kings and medically I cant fault them but I have heard great things about Tommies too.

Best of luck with your pregnancy and huge congratulations again.

I was with kings. Can't fault them and I had premmie baby so spent a lot of time there. Didn't see the same midwife twice though in run up to the birth but I wasn't too worried by this. The closeness is convenient. I agree it's better not to have to travel too far

Both excellent!


My eldest was born in Tommy's, I swapped from Kings at @ 36 weeks having had a bad labour ward tour at Kings.


My youngest was born at Kings.


If I were to have a third and were to choose between the two I would choose Kings although would be happy with either.


Happy to confide more in a pm

Congratulations to you!


At your point in my pregnancy I was utterly baffled by all the different options and I basically stayed that way until I was about 32 weeks when I was forced to admit that it was the stress of any hospital situation which was putting me off thinking about any of it. When I focused on how I deal with pain (like to be left alone and in familiar surroundings)I decided to look more into the home birth option, which I had thought was really only an option for those who had already had a child, and never looked back from there.


We used the East Team from Kings and they were fabulous. I had an entirely natural labour at home, which I honestly believe would never have happened had I been in hospital. The whole thing was such a positive experience which I had never dared to hope for whilst I was pregnant.


If having a home birth is even a slight possibility in your head right now I would really recommend checking out more about it. There's a session once a month at Midwife House in Camberwell where they invite along a couple who have recently had a homebirth and you can get a really good idea as to if it might be for you from that.


If you'd like to know more feel free to PM

Congratulations!


I also had my 1st baby at Kings last November and thought they were excellent, especially the midwives. I had to stay in for a week as she was premature and they were all fantastic.


I was at DMC and didn't get the Lanes midwife where they come to hospital with you (I think that's right!) but I had the same mid-wife throughout who was lovely & supportive.


I also second the being close to home as it meant my boyfriend could go home and pick up everything I needed throughout the week. He was also allowed to stay overnight (which I am not sure all hospitals offer) but he went home about midnight and came back first thing, which meant he could bring everything we needed which he couldn't have done had we been further away.

Distance can be key. Depends on where you live but I'm guessing kings is a lot closer. I stuck with kings after my gp pointed out that a) you might go into labour in rush hour b) if your due in winter which I think you are - what if it's snow !


Both the above can make Tommy's feel an awfully long way away


And thankfully I stick with kings - my son was in special care for a week and having my husband able to stay but also nip home quickly for clothes etc was a godsend. If I had been at Tommy's I would have felt a long way from home. And home = comfort.


I second the above about home birth though (we tried but didn't quite make the home birth) but laboured at home then my midwife came to hospital with us and had rung ahead so the room was booked etc made that bit of it so much easier

Thanks so much for taking the time to reply everyone, I'm really very grateful.

Cam123 I'm definitely thinking about a homebirth as an option, just need to read up on it as I'm a bit concerned that it's my first baby and I think the stats show that nearly half of women who homebirth their first end up having to go to hospital anyway - I think the key is to leave your options open and go with the flow!

I can only echo what others have said re the lanes, if you get a place you would be mad to turn them down, they are an incredible team offering exceptional 'service'

I had both my babies at home so can't comment on kings or tommies but certainaly if you are with the lanes you can choose to have a home oe hospital birth whilst in labour.

From my understanding, the stats for most people going is is largely for more pain relief rather than complications but do your research. The most important thing is to feel comfortable during labour, whether that is at home or hospital is up to you and you alone.

Can't help with the Kings v Tommies debate because I also had my first at home last year with the marvellous Brierley midwives, who specialise in home birth. I was lucky enough not to have to transfer to hospital as everything went pretty smoothly even with a very big baby. This blog helped me put all those stats into perspective when that birth place study came out.

http://hackneydoula.co.uk/?p=492


Good luck with your decision!

The Lanes, Oakwood & Brierly are midwives who specialise in homebirth. Because of this their transfer rates, even for 1st time Mums are significantly lower than those quoted in the 'place of birth' study. Ask 'em. :D I'd have to add my voice to the myriad of fans for them on here. They are definitely exceptional.


FWIW Kings & Tommies are very similar, but to my mind, Tommies labour ward ethos is that little bit more interventionist. This might be a good thing to you, or not?


From a purely personal perspective I'd always go for Kings over Tommies - less chance of an emergency (unplanned) caesarean, less chance of forceps birth, and it's closer - a no-brainer for me, given the choice (2011 stats, taken from www.birthchoiceuk.com). But purely personal, as I said.


Best wishes to you & your baby wherever you chose.

I had my first at tommies in 2010 and 2nd one at kings last autumn. I ummed and arhed over whether to go back to tommies or go with kings for the 2nd birth - wanted as natural as possible vbac and decided that I had more chance of this at kings but high blood pressure towards end of pregnancy meant I would need to be monitored intermittently as soon as my waters broke. I ended up with a pretty bad labour experience due to staff shortages and lack of space on the Labour ward, meaning delivery was nowhere near what I envisaged. If I was to have a 3rd I would be heading to tommies without a second thought, even though that birth ended as a emcs I did try for 36 hrs for a vaginal delivery but failure to process and baby getting distressed ended in surgery. All the care I received at tommies was fantastic.


Saying that things may have been different if I had a caseload midwife for 2nd pregnancy but even though with dmc missed out so if you do get a lanes midwife I would think long and had about your choice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...