Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But a defamatory statement is assumed to be false unless proven otherwise


Which is why every board is so careful these days.


Nicholas Spears Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This allegation is only libellous if it's not

> true. And it's not in breach of sub judice rules

> either: no court case is imminent, no individual

> culprit is named (a company would not be charged

> with theft, only invidivuals), and the chance of

> any jurors in some future case having read this

> thread is nigh on zero.

polla2256 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dougal Mulldoon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why blame this cleaning Co.? Maybe you were

> just

> > pissed and lost it? You believe? Any evidence

>

>

> Get lost troll - not helpful, given I have been on

> business in Europe and my wife has been working

> I'm pretty sure I wasn't pissed.


Are you pissed now? Just because you were challenged, does that make me a troll? I've been on here for years.

Back to the accusation that i was trolling - i wasn't it is perfectly sound advice not to keep large amounts of cash in your house. This is because it cannot be traced if stolen and also insurance companies will only pay out a very samll amount to replace it (often around ?50 i think) so really all in all it is good advice genrally not to keep large amounts of cash about your person or in your property. However at no time did i say being foolish makes being stolen from ok.

:)


*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm having all our furniture and possessions

> removed from our house asap and put into secure

> storage.

>

>

> After all, if we we robbed and any of these things

> get taken - we'll only have ourselves to blame.

Yes - because it's gone, there's almost nothing you can do about it and if

someone did take it they've got away with it.


been there, and it's annoying.



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sound advice is frequently offered on here with

> somewhat insensitive timing.

"I've been robbed and without proof I'm going to name a company I think what dunnit"


Yeah I'm sticking with, if not idiot, then ill judged


It's with the "authorities" (not police, but authorities?) so if its as bang up as the OPsuggests, there will be proof and a conviction and then we can talk about the who


Until then I would leave out the company name and stick with general warnings

Heehee! :)


*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm having all our furniture and possessions

> removed from our house asap and put into secure

> storage.

>

>

> After all, if we we robbed and any of these things

> get taken - we'll only have ourselves to blame.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm having all our furniture and possessions

> removed from our house asap and put into secure

> storage.

>

>

> After all, if we we robbed and any of these things

> get taken - we'll only have ourselves to blame.


Hardly the point. It valuables as apposed to "furniture and possessions" that are the issue. Thieves are likely to take items that are small and/or liquid (easily converted to cash). Having large amounts of cash at home is not smart - and from the recent responses by polla2256, we can see they arent the most intelligent of people.

lane lover - I wouldn't be so harsh on the OP as it can be quite upsetting to lose that much cash so I'm taking any belligerence from them with a pinch of salt


they have been posting intelligently enough on here for a while and deserve a bit more respect than that


I am also uncomfortable with people saying what you should and shouldn't keep in the house - it's not far removed from tellng women what they can't wear for fear of being attacked

lane lover Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hardly the point. It valuables as apposed to

> "furniture and possessions" that are the issue.

> Thieves are likely to take items that are small

> and/or liquid (easily converted to cash).


Do you mean things like cash, laptops, AV gear, phones, tablets, jewellery.. These sorts of things?


I hope you don't keep any of these items at home. After all, you'd be a fool to do so.

I keep all of those things in my flat


Doubt I'm fully insured for them either - but I choose to take that risk.

I carry my iPhone around with me too, and use it on public transport (horror :)) ).


Don't keep more than ?100 cash on me or in the house though anymore.



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lane lover Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hardly the point. It valuables as apposed to

> > "furniture and possessions" that are the issue.

> > Thieves are likely to take items that are small

> > and/or liquid (easily converted to cash).

>

> Do you mean things like cash, laptops, AV gear,

> phones, tablets, jewellery.. These sorts of

> things?

>

> I hope you don't keep any of these items at home.

> After all, you'd be a fool to do so.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I've been robbed and without proof I'm going to

> name a company I think what dunnit"

>

> Yeah I'm sticking with, if not idiot, then ill

> judged

>

> It's with the "authorities" (not police, but

> authorities?) so if its as bang up as the

> OPsuggests, there will be proof and a conviction

> and then we can talk about the who

>

> Until then I would leave out the company name and

> stick with general warnings


This case was reported to the london met, I have met with 2 officers today who advised they intended to raise the charges of theft by staff. They would have arrested the cleaner this evening for questioning, however I gave the company the chance of resolve at dinner time (the offer was to meet with the supervisor tonight) and told the police of this meeting.


From then I was advised that if a resolve could not be found they would refer the case to the CID due to the nature of the charges. If a resolve was found they would not take further action.


I met with the company supervisor tonight and settled the matter. After doing so I provided the info to the police.


The case is now resolved.


To those who I was abrupt with I apologise, to those who cast insult, well whatever i'll probably join you with banter in another thread anyway.


It was the staff member who stole, but the company contracts the staff and hold some accountability for the checks the carry out and people they provide hence why I named them (no diffent to watchdog). Hopefull it's just 1 bad egg but I have no trust in them and am entitled to this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...