Jump to content

Theiving cleaner in east dulwich

polla2256
 Share

Recommended Posts

JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

But a defamatory statement is assumed to be false unless proven otherwise


Which is why every board is so careful these days.


Nicholas Spears Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This allegation is only libellous if it's not

> true. And it's not in breach of sub judice rules

> either: no court case is imminent, no individual

> culprit is named (a company would not be charged

> with theft, only invidivuals), and the chance of

> any jurors in some future case having read this

> thread is nigh on zero.

Dougal Mulldoon

Dougal Mulldoon

Posted
Posted

polla2256 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dougal Mulldoon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why blame this cleaning Co.? Maybe you were

> just

> > pissed and lost it? You believe? Any evidence

>

>

> Get lost troll - not helpful, given I have been on

> business in Europe and my wife has been working

> I'm pretty sure I wasn't pissed.


Are you pissed now? Just because you were challenged, does that make me a troll? I've been on here for years.

Cyclemonkey

Cyclemonkey

Posted
Posted
Back to the accusation that i was trolling - i wasn't it is perfectly sound advice not to keep large amounts of cash in your house. This is because it cannot be traced if stolen and also insurance companies will only pay out a very samll amount to replace it (often around ?50 i think) so really all in all it is good advice genrally not to keep large amounts of cash about your person or in your property. However at no time did i say being foolish makes being stolen from ok.
LondonMix

LondonMix

Posted
Posted

:)


*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm having all our furniture and possessions

> removed from our house asap and put into secure

> storage.

>

>

> After all, if we we robbed and any of these things

> get taken - we'll only have ourselves to blame.

JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

Yes - because it's gone, there's almost nothing you can do about it and if

someone did take it they've got away with it.


been there, and it's annoying.



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sound advice is frequently offered on here with

> somewhat insensitive timing.

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

"I've been robbed and without proof I'm going to name a company I think what dunnit"


Yeah I'm sticking with, if not idiot, then ill judged


It's with the "authorities" (not police, but authorities?) so if its as bang up as the OPsuggests, there will be proof and a conviction and then we can talk about the who


Until then I would leave out the company name and stick with general warnings

Girl82

Girl82

Posted
Posted

Heehee! :)


*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm having all our furniture and possessions

> removed from our house asap and put into secure

> storage.

>

>

> After all, if we we robbed and any of these things

> get taken - we'll only have ourselves to blame.

lane lover

lane lover

Posted
Posted

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm having all our furniture and possessions

> removed from our house asap and put into secure

> storage.

>

>

> After all, if we we robbed and any of these things

> get taken - we'll only have ourselves to blame.


Hardly the point. It valuables as apposed to "furniture and possessions" that are the issue. Thieves are likely to take items that are small and/or liquid (easily converted to cash). Having large amounts of cash at home is not smart - and from the recent responses by polla2256, we can see they arent the most intelligent of people.

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

lane lover - I wouldn't be so harsh on the OP as it can be quite upsetting to lose that much cash so I'm taking any belligerence from them with a pinch of salt


they have been posting intelligently enough on here for a while and deserve a bit more respect than that


I am also uncomfortable with people saying what you should and shouldn't keep in the house - it's not far removed from tellng women what they can't wear for fear of being attacked

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

lane lover Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hardly the point. It valuables as apposed to

> "furniture and possessions" that are the issue.

> Thieves are likely to take items that are small

> and/or liquid (easily converted to cash).


Do you mean things like cash, laptops, AV gear, phones, tablets, jewellery.. These sorts of things?


I hope you don't keep any of these items at home. After all, you'd be a fool to do so.

JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

I keep all of those things in my flat


Doubt I'm fully insured for them either - but I choose to take that risk.

I carry my iPhone around with me too, and use it on public transport (horror :)) ).


Don't keep more than ?100 cash on me or in the house though anymore.



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lane lover Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hardly the point. It valuables as apposed to

> > "furniture and possessions" that are the issue.

> > Thieves are likely to take items that are small

> > and/or liquid (easily converted to cash).

>

> Do you mean things like cash, laptops, AV gear,

> phones, tablets, jewellery.. These sorts of

> things?

>

> I hope you don't keep any of these items at home.

> After all, you'd be a fool to do so.

polla2256

polla2256

Posted
  • Author
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I've been robbed and without proof I'm going to

> name a company I think what dunnit"

>

> Yeah I'm sticking with, if not idiot, then ill

> judged

>

> It's with the "authorities" (not police, but

> authorities?) so if its as bang up as the

> OPsuggests, there will be proof and a conviction

> and then we can talk about the who

>

> Until then I would leave out the company name and

> stick with general warnings


This case was reported to the london met, I have met with 2 officers today who advised they intended to raise the charges of theft by staff. They would have arrested the cleaner this evening for questioning, however I gave the company the chance of resolve at dinner time (the offer was to meet with the supervisor tonight) and told the police of this meeting.


From then I was advised that if a resolve could not be found they would refer the case to the CID due to the nature of the charges. If a resolve was found they would not take further action.


I met with the company supervisor tonight and settled the matter. After doing so I provided the info to the police.


The case is now resolved.


To those who I was abrupt with I apologise, to those who cast insult, well whatever i'll probably join you with banter in another thread anyway.


It was the staff member who stole, but the company contracts the staff and hold some accountability for the checks the carry out and people they provide hence why I named them (no diffent to watchdog). Hopefull it's just 1 bad egg but I have no trust in them and am entitled to this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      While they struggle with economics of UK plc, collectively we all suffer as a result of their ineptitude. 
    • Insuflo
      Councillor Jon Hartley

      By Insuflo · Posted

      I’ve tried to find details of surgeries being held before but not found any. The section of the Southwark website that details councillors’ surgeries says that: Your locally elected Councillors will be holding a roving surgery programme in the Dulwich Hill area to enable residents to raise any local issues. Residents will be notified by letter in advance of the date, time and specific streets/roads where the surgery will take place.  Surgeries are not held in August, on Bank Holidays, Easter or in Christmas Week.  Dulwich Hill Ward Councillors I’ve never seen any notification of surgeries being held, including on the DH councillors’ social media accounts. I don’t know if any other residents of Dulwich Hill have? Neighbouring wards all seem to have times and places posted for surgeries.   
    • David Peckham
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By David Peckham · Posted

      I wouldn't feel too bad about that. It's one of the few degree areas that you can do a BA or a BSc in, so it's a fairly wide-ranging and complex subject. Certainly Truss, Kwasi and Reeves seem to struggle with it.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I can't access the article - what's the gist?  I took the markets getting jittery when she was crying at PMQs to be a sign that they trusted her. But maybe it was because they were simply worried about any form of instability.  The NIC hikes have stymied the economy, which we could all see a mile off. Will a wealth tax improve things? Does anyone here think the trickle down has any impact and that chasing out the super rich will help things? Or are we just seeing off the biggest contributors to the economy? And has the Kwasi approach ever worked anywhere else?  Economics is not my strong point at all, I'd love to know others' opinions, but it seems to be she has few options, especially as the party is so divided. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...