Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Now then.


a serious topic, no piss takery.


Why has street art become to popular in da hood of late ?


an off the cuff example - back in the mid 2000s, a mooted grafitti fest in /on GG was met with hostility, leading to shops displaying anti graf fest hyperbole, now we have a situation whereby many retail outlets are gagging to have their walls muraled up


The Spurling road issue is another example of what wasnt acceptable but would be now


Opinions and vox pops on this sought please.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/
Share on other sites

I loathe and do not support indiscriminate, clannish, sometimes gang-linked tagging but if an artist has permission to paint and it's suitable for all eyes, then I'm for it.


I would ask, though, that the paintings get changed every few years or so and that if they are vandalised the artists are duty bound to repair them. IngridB - how does this fit in with the rules and regs for this current round of public art in and around SE22?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/#findComment-646056
Share on other sites

Isn't 'street art' the same mis nomer as 'street food'?. We have murals, pavement chalk drawings, etc. Why not just use the specific term rather than urbanise it to make boring middle classes feel 'in touch' when the nearest they get to 'street' is stealing a parking space by having a dropped kerb.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/#findComment-646244
Share on other sites

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't get me wrong, I think street art can be

> nice. And I think IngridB did a helluva job.

>

> But the big bee at the Plough is a stinker.

>

> Can we have this one instead?



No the big bee is nice


So shut y'mowff steveo

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/#findComment-652168
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ive just spotted this thread. Good to have debate about the art. Every wall has its own story, and there are chances to find out more about them and see the originals in Dulwich Picture Gallery which inspired them. Im running some walks, here is the blurb:


Sunday 14 & 28 July

2 ? 5 pm


Fifteen of the world?s leading street artists were invited to Dulwich Picture Gallery to study the Baroque paintings and reinterpret their choice on walls around Dulwich. The walk includes most of these walls and pavements, and ends at Dulwich Picture Gallery where the paintings that inspired the artists will be explained.

Meet at Vale End, SE22 opposite East Dulwich Station. Finish at Dulwich Picture Gallery. Refreshment stop in Court Lane.

?12 includes entry to Dulwich Picture Gallery

Book in advance. Cash on arrival.

For more info and to book email [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/#findComment-659337
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't get me wrong, I think street art can be

> nice. And I think IngridB did a helluva job.

>

> But the big bee at the Plough is a stinker.

>

> Can we have this one instead?


Shows it's all subjective doesn't it? I really like the bee and I think the one you've linked is awful. Not a big fan of the numerous stick men and I really don't like the 'new age' type stuff down by the Herne Tavern, but as they're not directly opposite my livingroom window or on the side of my house I'm not really bothered.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/#findComment-661727
Share on other sites

And now I must close this thread. I intended it to be a discussion of urban art, embracing opinions, formenting dissent - you get it bludz. IngridB - you have probabaly inadvertandly killed this discussion, like a shank to its heart. This is a metaphor for the whole movement bro'
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/#findComment-661734
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I loathe and do not support indiscriminate,

> clannish, sometimes gang-linked tagging but if an

> artist has permission to paint and it's suitable

> for all eyes, then I'm for it.

>

> I would ask, though, that the paintings get

> changed every few years or so and that if they are

> vandalised the artists are duty bound to repair


> them. IngridB - how does this fit in with the

> rules and regs for this current round of public

> art in and around SE22?


I didnt answer this, sorry. If there is any tagging etc on the artworks, either the artist themselves, if they are around, or another person skilled with a spray can, will mend it.


So far one piece has been painted out completely by the wall owner because she didnt like it. (a panel on the side of Mrs Robinson) That's fine, its her wall.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32348-street-art/#findComment-661778
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...