Jump to content

Recommended Posts

it is just another friggin' pointless shop in Lordship Lane, esp if it really does sell such horrid shoes. There already are two shoe shops the area selling half reasonable shoes, do we really need another, particularly if it sells such vile artefacts - as has been alleged by Bob et al.

Spangles30, how dare you suggest that these overpriced small shops are pointless. If you want to live in ED you have to like it or lump it, remember, there are scary places like Bromley and Lewisham where you can actually buy more for less and have a greater variety so be thankful you are living in such a nice sophisticated area such as this.


Louisa.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The tyre place will be a permanent home for the

> bakers who currently sell outside Moxon's

>

> Glad to see the old Access sign is still up above

> the shop mind you!


I think the tyre place is becoming a greengrocers - possibly as part of Franklins. It's the Chicken Licken that's becoming the bakery.

Well, I for one am pleased there'll be a shoe shop opening.

One can never have too many shoes.:)

If you look at the website properly, they appear to have a good variety of nice shoes, aswell as the dodgy ones.

Why don't we just give these places a chance, instead of beating them down before they've even opened?

you're quite right and I'm sorry, in a really foul mood this morning and took it out on the shoe boutique. had a look through the site before commenting and they're very much not my kind of shoes (not just the bad ones posted on here), but hey, horses for courses and all


I'll keep shopping up west and wish them well with their venture

Spangles30 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL Sue, and yes couldn't agree more. The clothes

> shops are awful in the area, just vile. Shame we

> don't have any quirky, bohemian vintage shops -

> have to go different parts of London for any

> tasteful stuff clothes/house wise.



I'm not sure that is really fair - The White Stuff is not really vile, but safe and rather unimaginative, Petals and Mrs Robinson aren't really vile - just beyond my pocket, and Chichirarawhatever seems to be very popular (isn't that meant to be a quirky bohemian vintage shop?)

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Surely you mean "oversized clothes for overweight

> people". The Weight Stuff.



I?ve noticed this about M&S too. I tend to buy my work clothes from them. I?m 6ft1 and I have to buy Small sizes to get clothes that fit.


Plus I have a beer belly. :-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...