Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wrong. I have posted before about this lousy bus service, 'serving' (LOL) East Dulwich. Overheard last night: Between a driver waiting to start his shift on a 185, and numerous passengers waiting . . . waiting for the 484.


Passengers point out to the driver that the Countdown time for the 484 has read 'DUE' for 20 minutes. And that this happens day after day.


It's very simple, says the driver. The bus company misinforms the Countdown system. So there you have it - for a 4-late-4 you can't even trust the electronic wait time.


The company in question is Abellio, who are Dutch. And you can bet your last guilder they wouldn't DARE mess Dutch travellers round this way back home. But here in London, dozy lazy complacent complicit TfL points one of its 2 blind eyes and waves the situation through. Wake up TfL suits! Put your pension plans down for just one minute and do the regulatory job you've been tasked to do.


Blimey o'reilly


Lee Scoresby

Not ranting Alex K, and I don't need your condescension. Or does dissent bother you, Alex K?


It's anger at a lousy public service. I have said on the EDF before, the more people put up with stuff, the more we'll get dumped on.


This is a FORUM, read the label. In a democracy, people talk together and share knowledge.


Now in fact, mechanisms of accountability and change are extremely imperfect in Britain, not least in local government. If there were an effective 'other venue' I would use it. But I can talk to other SE Londoners about the situation.


ianr, it was Camberwell, coming toward East Dulwich.

It only ever happens at the first stops, eg. Camberwell Green & Kings.


I've always got the impression that the buses are due to leave the bus station at Camberwell at a certain time, which gets posted on the countdown board as say 2mins at the first stop, 4 mins at Kings.


Then for some reason, the bus doesn't actually leave the depot when it's supposed to.


Hence, 2 mins becomes 5 etc.


It doesn't usually happen further along the route, once it is known what time the bus has actually started it's run.


This has been going on for ages, so the problem obviously lies with either Camberwell bus depot and/or Abellio & the info they are sending out.

Happy to cut Countdown itself a bit of slack - it's ballpark - often the bus comes SOONER than advised - (unlike "adjusting the service", hoho, which just means hangin' about in a stopped bus) - but 'DUE' for 20 minutes? - it destroys trust in the system


It may be 'start of route' - here's something that happens further down the line - just happened to me 90 minutes before writing this - not exactly rush hour: the 484 was chock-a-block, and people waiting at an ED stop were left standing.


My point: this is a chronically badly run route, and TfL has failed over years to stand up for passengers. And as I pointed out to Alex K, there is no obvious way for us to hold the nameless-faceless ones to account and insist on a properly serviced bus route.


Lee Scoresby

Lee was a BIT ranty, but that doesn't mean he is wrong


Some bus routes simply are better run than others. 484 is poor and the 37 oscillates between ok and poor


The bus countdowns for 40/176/185 are near enough reliable


bus countdowns on 37 route, no matter where you are, can be a complete work of fiction. Yesterday at Herne Hill it said 15 mins, then 13, then back to 18, then stayed at 20 mins for a while before eventually counting down to 0 and a bus turned up


On other days it can say 8 minutes, only for a bus to arrive in 2 minutes


This just doesn't happen on other routes and there must be an underlying reason - some routes rely on manual updates maybe?


Anyway - 484. Rubbish. All single decker services in London = rubbish

**condescension**?


I addressed you as an equal; no thought of "descending" to a level below mine. If I've triggered a deep-seated flare of self-perceived inadequacy, I do apologise. I have no idea when a poster's psyche harbours an explosive device of that sort, much less when its fuse is live, and certainly I did not mean to set off in you such a flare.


If a complaint is made in a forum none of whose readers can act to resolve the complaint... the falling tree, the forest, no one to hear it, is the tree's noisy complaint acted on? I sympathise with the *non*ranter, then, in his *non*rant, but am at a loss as to what to do beyond extending condolences. TopTree, above, has made a practical suggestion. Let me endorse it: Complain to BoJo.


And **Does dissent bother you...**?


Why should it? I can't follow that train of associations at all.

It might be worth putting in a complaint to tfl - they have a team dealing with bus complaints, the contact is here:


https://custserv.tfl.gov.uk/icss_csip/ZCreateRequestChangeAboutValue.do?newTab=CA_12162


A friend used to work on this team, they seemed to try hard to sort complaints out

Well Alex K, now we've taken a bite out of each other, shall we leave it? I have no interest whatever in troll-on-troll action.


'Authoritarian personalities' occasionally come on the EDF for whom dissent (speaking about problems) is offensive and threatening. So I'm glad that isn't you.


Thanks for all the suggestions about what to do. I really do not want to seem cynical about any of them. In past years I have engaged with a variety of complaint procedures, not just about transport. Every one of them was just a garbage chute. It was impossible even to get the system to refer to (never mind admit) the issue at hand. Nothing whatever was ever achieved. Transport user groups, in the past at least, have been famously, hilariously unwilling to upset the transport companies they were supposely holding to account.


In this present context, my point to people is really to notice how scattered and temporary and uncertain these suggested remedies are. Feedback (a better idea than 'complaint') should be such an inherent intuitive evident continuous part of any modern urban public system that this sort of forum thread would be superfluous.


Lee Scoresby

The 484 service has been badly hit in the last few weeks by long-running roadworks in Ladywell that mean there's a weird diversion in operation in Brockley on both directions. I find it's a reasonable service most of the time, but a very busy one. It's a lot better than the train service.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Please do keep pavements clear for pushchairs, etc, when leaving trees outside. 
    • Hi DuncanW, Price is a function of supply and demand where demand is a function of the taxation or properties, price and availability of finance for all the different type of buyers both domestic and foreign individual and business and corporate. Much foreign buying also have some cultural issues around not buying or even using second hand homes so they remain empty - see lack of lights on riverside proprieties in London.  Hi beansprout, Finland solution, admittedly a much smaller country, that housing the homeless is significantly cheaper than not housing them in terms of health, social ,etc costs.    Southwark has the joint highest number of empty council homes, and second worst total number of empty homes a smidgen behind Barnet Council in London - https://www.selondoner.co.uk/news/16052025-southwark-council-sees-most-empty-homes-owned-as-long-term-vacants-increase-again .  We do have infill sites in the area. Infiill sites are small parcels of land. The Railway site isn't an infill site, it's too big. It is a raised area by roughly two storeys compared to the area where a  9 storey tower and other 7 & 8 storey blocks will be built on top. This is totally out of character for the area. Many residents will be directly impacted. Other developers on the night told me after the Panning Committee approval that they were shocked it had been approved. It has changed their attitudes of what can be approved in the area. Dulwich Hamlet ground has very recently been approved to be moved to Metropolitan Open Land green open space to allow the current ground to be rebuilt into from memory 248 flats. It seems clear Labour councils have been directed by the Labour Government to 'approve baby approve'. Southwark Council and the Labour Government are planning the reduction in the proportion of Social Housing in new housing developments from 35% to 20%. This likely to delay a number of approved schemes while they recycle through the planning process to reduce their social housing numbers.  WRT student numbers. The peak is forecast in 2030 with rapid decline thereafter. International students numbers already declining. What will happen to these blocks of small studio rooms in the longer term once student numbers are down? Students likely to choose more centrally located blocks. Current student accommodation such as Champion Hill has been closed for a number of years with no rush to reopen it so King's doesn't appear to feel pressure on the student accommodation front.   
    • Good to be reminded this is still operating
    • I don't know if this is the right section to put this, but if you see anybody sleeping rough in this freezing cold, you can alert an organisation who will help via this link https://thestreetlink.org.uk/ Shelters have been set up in London for them. This is from an email I got today: London has been facing dangerously cold temperatures. For those sleeping rough, this weather can be life-threatening. London’s Severe Weather Emergency Protocol (SWEP) has been activated throughout this week to ensure warm, safe emergency accommodation has been available for those who need it. StreetLink connects people sleeping rough with local outreach teams who assess their needs and offer support services. By making a report, you could save someone’s life.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...