Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst I agree on the general point, and also PeckhamPam's point re: tripadvisor et al, does anybody realistically expect well-written, articulate, more-than-amateurish reviews on a local message board?


To stay with the Locale thread, one or two very negative posts are balanced with a fair amount of, if not high praise, then at least moderate praise and a lot of goodwill. Which makes the original post ironic in that it overlooks anything positive to make a negative point


But then again.....

Rules regarding restaurant critique are fairly straightforward here, Alan.


Established restaurants are not as good as they used to be.

New restaurants are not as good as established restaurants, unless (see above)

Little-known restaurants serve the best food around - until other people start going - then they go downhill.

Sandperson - I would have though you would be way too elated to be blowing raspberries at anyone today!


Personally I love a good negative review - Mathew Norman does some corkers, but yes I do prefer when it brings wit to the, erm, table rather than just "ick - me no likee" style prose

The Locale discussion is balanced, surprisingly so given how bad it is. Aren't the majority of reviews mediocre to poor because the food around here is mediocre? Apart from a handful of restaurants (Palmerston, Ganapati on a good day, Montpelier if you're hungover) I find the food adequate at best; far better in central and north London.

Alan, you say that people saying 'Si Mangia is way better' is a type of playground praise but your contribution was simply "For Italian try Caravaggio on Camberwell Church St." which isn't exactly telling us about a positive experience you have had is it?


As pointed out it's not a restaurant review site, just local people telling of their experiences and I think having a go at them for their quality of reviews is rather elitist, confusingly so when your "review" was just eight words suggesting another restaurant.


[edited once]

This is an informal local forum and when someone posts about a restaurant I want to know what sort of experience they actually had - whether good or bad. We all comment bearing in mind our own expectations and attitudes, we like/dislike different things, surely it is important to be honest.


Perhaps the problem is that we all expect to have a good time when we go out to eat at a restaurant - otherwise we wouldn't have gone there, so perhaps that is why a disappointing meal can be more memorable than a good one - it's the outcome we didn't expect and therefore feel cheated.

anyone who comments on the price of food, clearly cannot afford to eat out! this probably has something to do with the fact that they are spending all their money on living in ED!! in fact people who regard themselves as critics of any discription really need to take the stick out of their a!*@!!!!!! dont eat out if your going to complain, one should only make comments if they relate to a positive experiance.

really ED theatrical critics get over yourselves

lots of love

xxx

Another take on it is that if the livelihoods of people are in good hands, then negative feedback can be used to turn things around and avert problems in the future


Green & Blue and the SeaCow are two business that responded maturely to criticism (some of it of the overly-negative type highlighted by Alan) and appear to be doing well on the back of it.


Nothing but positive reviews lose their meaning - does anybody take the reviews in Living South seriously for example? But broadly speaking I think I'm with Alan - don't be a guerilla critic, doing an ananymous hit and run. Make it part of a constructive dialogue. Which I think many people on here do

lenadee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> anyone who comments on the price of food, clearly

> cannot afford to eat out! this probably has

> something to do with the fact that they are

> spending all their money on living in ED!! in fact

> people who regard themselves as critics of any

> discription really need to take the stick out of

> their a!*@!!!!!! dont eat out if your going to

> complain, one should only make comments if they

> relate to a positive experiance.

> really ED theatrical critics get over yourselves

> lots of love

> xxx



That's not strictly true. Even people rolling in money want to feel that they are getting value for that money so talking about price is valid.

lenadee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> anyone who comments on the price of food, clearly

> cannot afford to eat out!



Don?t mean to be rude or anything (well I probably do) but that is the biggest load of cock I?ve ever heard in my life.

Many of the critiques of Locale were, reasonably balanced, many were also positive - albeit about a perceived competitor - Si Mangia. I certainly was and, I like to think, my comments on Locale were constructive criticism - balancing the positive with the less positive.

Lenadee I hate to complain in or about restaurants or any other business, but I like value for money and if I get that at one place and not another I tell the forum about the good ones.

The bad ones may be mentioned by other forumistas and I may add my version, but to say if you complain about the cost of a meal you cannot afford to eat out, is certainly not the case with me.

I am a critic for good places much more so than the bad, but why not say if you have been ripped off by a garage, a plumber or a restaurant.

If you place the facts on the forum it is for the readers to decide what to do about that information, just as a business may benefit from me discovering a product they stock via the forum, which has happened on several occasions, and I tell them so too. I have also taken print outs of threads they appear on and they are usually interested enough to ignore you, whilst they read it.

I shall continue to praise the great and good, and slag off the toads who do not give good consumer service, negative comments are invaluable if sensible and honest, to all wise businessmen.

Right then. As one of the more critical posters about my Locale experience I feel I ought to respond.




Alan Dale Wrote:

"The truth is that in spite of being expensive,

Locale is popular and I suspect it will be

succesful. If one of you more eloquent amateur

critics could explain why it works, how it works

and why it is such an asset to this aspirational

area of Peckham then I'd be glad to read it"


It's too early to say whether or not the new 'East Dulwich' (I agree with you that it's more Peckham) branch of Locale will be successful, and certainly too early to say whether or not it is popular. Any new restaurant launched well will attract a decent level of custom in its first weeks because people will be keen to try it out. So it's really not up to any critic, amateur or otherwise, to analyse the 'success' of this venture (yet). In any event, is restaurant criticism really about identifying why commercially successful establishments do well? I think most people would agree that commercial success does not always mean good value, tasty food.


Secondly, I do not buy your premise that it is easier to be negative than positive. Take your supporting evidence for this: "You can rely on just detailing events, errors, omissions and comparisons to superior experiences. The ease of preparing such criticism attracts allcomers. Anyone who's had the slightest complaint about a meal can attempt restaurant criticism with confidence and gusto."

You could equally say that it is easier to be positive than negative by relying on comparisons to inferior experiences and things that went right with the meal. It's clearly the case that people are more likely to report a negative experience than a positive one - but it has ever been thus, and that fact simply makes business owners more eager to please, which can hardly be a bad thing.


"I believe that where livlihoods are at stake people should be reluctant to publish anecdotal negative experiences for fear of excessively tarnishing reputations. Any such a post should be heavily caveated with 'perhaps I was unlucky but' or 'I don't know that this is always the case but' or something to that effect. "

Any report on a forum such as this is clearly a description of a single, personal experience. I don't think it is up to the poster to make this explicitly clear with each post. The value of 'citizen' reviews is in their aggregation - yes, one should be more hesitant to rely on a single negative review on e.g. London Eating/EDF than a national paper before writing off a restaurant, but one can take fairly seriously 10 negative views saying more or less the same thing, especially if no-one has a good word to say (not the case with Locale).


I think you are being unnecessarily defensive of the poor quality dining experience available at Locale.




lenadee: I think you are totally wrong, and your comments are pretty offensive. Would you be happy to pay the same for the food at Thai Corner Cottage as e.g. The Fat Duck (not that I've eaten there - just an example of a michelin-starred place with prices approximately 20 times as high as TCC)? Value remains important in dining no matter how rich you are. You seem to suggest that unless you're rich enough to pay any imaginable restaurant bill (very few are) you should eat at home 365 days a year. Are you completely mad?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...