Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hannahspanner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had breakfast there with a friend a couple of

> months ago. We both had hairs in our food:'(


Keep it quite hannah, these middle-class bastards will all be demanding them now.

Hi,


I have never been into the BMC but notice that if you want to go inside you have to cross pretend mosaic. Given that it is uneven and slippery when wet it constitutes a health and safety problem. I also noticed chairs that were not stable.


Well, thats another needle into the death of a local business.

Which is the next business that we will slag off and make them close.


Regards,

Libra Carr


Suppliers of fresh food and salads to the gentry

Have you notified the authorities about this breach of heath and safety Libra Carr or are you going to wait until there's an accident? Did you tell the manager about the unstable chairs? I have to say you're making quite a substantial allegation there about a business and I hope you can back it up (i.e. that you have tested the slipperiness of the flooring) should you have to.


Of course you could be jesting and trying to make a point that (you think) people are trying to close local businesses with their comments and criticism. Strange way to do it.

Mark Wrote:

> Of course you could be jesting and trying to make

> a point that (you think) people are trying to

> close local businesses with their comments and

> criticism. Strange way to do it.


If so, she's a bit OTT. I don't see why I should be banned from commenting on such poor service that we had to leave without eating and my little boy burst into tears. The proof BMC's long term future is unlikely to be affected by my criticism, is that poor service there has been an issue for many years, yet it still thrives.

  • Administrator
It was big brother. As a courtesy to local businesses sometimes I change the titles to just the businesses name, this is usually when the title is "business x - terrible place!" or "business y - don't go there!". You title was borderline but I see it states what you did, and is not detrimental to the business on its own, so I apologise for changing it.
There is no doubt that that "pretend mosaic" flooring outside the BMC which they installed a few years back is potentially extremely dangerous in wet conditions - especially to someone not too steady on their feet. It is a negligence action waiting to happen I think. (Only *my* personal opinion obviously)

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was big brother. As a courtesy to local

> businesses sometimes I change the titles to just

> the businesses name, this is usually when the

> title is "business x - terrible place!" or

> "business y - don't go there!". You title was

> borderline but I see it states what you did, and

> is not detrimental to the business on its own, so

> I apologise for changing it.


Apology accepted, but bit surprised you didn't tell me you were changing it! Still, at least I'm not going doolally

  • Administrator

I do not tell everyone that I am changing their title, like it says in the terms of the site I sometimes edit them, usually to make them more informative to users. Yesterday (as is typical) I moved six "wanted" and non East Dulwich specific posts out of the gossip section and changed the title of six different "wanted" posts to make them more descriptive, the point being that I cannot tell everybody that I am making a change.


Anyway, let us not take this off topic, back to talking about The Blue Mountain Cafe.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is no doubt that that "pretend mosaic"

> flooring outside the BMC which they installed a

> few years back is potentially extremely dangerous

> in wet conditions - especially to someone not too

> steady on their feet. It is a negligence action

> waiting to happen I think. (Only *my* personal

> opinion obviously)


In wet conditions? In brothel creepers? It's an accident waiting to happen.

That's why I avoid it and rock 'n' roll my way down to Rock Steady Eddie's at Camberwell.

#That's why I go for that rock and roll (and butter) music.....#

like it or loath it BMC has been in the vanguard of ED gentrification for at least 20 years. I did hear the guy who laid the mosaic has a house in the Bellenden area with very similar embelishments and is going to leave it to the NT.

I shit you not!


PS I'm not a shareholder in BMC.

PPS I'm not Mel.


As an aside has anyone pointed this thread out to BMC, maybe they'll act upon the comments and pull the staff into line.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am pretty sure it was there in 1984....but am

> ready to be corrected.


xxxxxxx


I live in Ulverscroft road opposite the BMC.


The opening of the BMC was one of the first signs of the changes happening in ED. I'm absolutely certain it wasn't there when I moved to ED in 1991. If there was a cafe there in 1984, it can't possibly have been the same place.


When the BMC opened, it had a counter at the front selling bread, yummy cakes and coffee beans. There were a few little rooms at the back, including one tiny one decorated in Chinesy red.


It was a very unusual venture for the area at that time. North Cross Road when I moved here had a newsagent, butcher, cobbler and Greek deli. Lordship Lane had a toy shop and junk shops. There were no decent places to drink.


Grace and Favour opened a while later as a teashop/cafe, but then became what it is now.


Surely someone else must remember the BMC opening??!!

oops yes...I remembered taking my mother there on one of her *very* rare visits to see me...had though it wa sher 80's visit but now see it must have been the '94 one..


And yes I remember with affection the state of the place when it first opened,,,great cakes...coffee in cafetieres...the whole place down out in bare-bricked, bomb-blast Chic...

I first went there in 2000...and stopped going in 2003 after several bad experiences while I was pregnant and with a small baby.... like when I had scrambled eggs and a bagel (pregnancy craving) and the bagel was sent back, burnt, and no replacement appeared for 15 mi ns, by which time the scrambled egg was cold. That was the incident that really put me off, being pregnant and tearful. I complained then and they just shrugged. It's very disappointing that despite the premises makeover, the chef is no faster than the "old days"


Anyway, i mailed them now via the site to ask if they intend to respond to the complaint I left.

And I'm afraid it is not only the ED branch that's poor. I was in the Sydenham branch on Tues and had one of the worst cups of coffee I've had in a long time.


But it has no competition in Sydenham for that sort of establishment so probably does quite well. Staff were very nice though. Gave me directions to the station and even offered me some free staff birthday cake. Maybe by combining ther best elements of the two we could have one decent cafe.

Like many other London restaurants that remain inexplicably successful, the food and service remains unreliable or even poor because most people going there wouldnt know or care what good is, or actually get a perverse enjoyment from how bad it is.


The endemic British lack of quality expectations (and it is a British thing - the rest of Europe and the developed Commonwealth doesn't share it) seems partly a perceived class issue. E.g. Louisa who thinks that anyone who wont just accept any old crap chucked their way is some sort of arrogant toff and is directly responsible for all that is wrong with the world: One should prove one's worth by only eating soggy chips and cold beans.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...