Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I take back what I said about thoughtful process - agree with unlurked that lice is a big problem, and disappointed that there was no provision for anti-lice upholstery in the planning application.


Suspect they have also forgotten about a pedestrian barrier / cattle grid to ensure that offending patrons (e.g. old people and young children) emerging from the darkness of the cinema into the light of the street are prevented from causing unnecessary traffic disruptions.


I vote for Lord of the Flies.

strae Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Suspect they have also forgotten about a

> pedestrian barrier / cattle grid to ensure that

> offending patrons (e.g. old people and young

> children) emerging from the darkness of the cinema

> into the light of the street are prevented from

> causing unnecessary traffic disruptions.

>

Actually if you'd bothered to visit the presentation or view the photo of the proposed scheme posted above you'll see the pedestrian barriers which are already there will stay, probably for the exact reason you've stated.

Actually AF, I find it much easier to form opinions without the benefit of having seen the applications.

I leave it to more diligent citizens of the EDF to argue points of detail - I will stick to being outraged on principle.



Arthur Facksake Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> strae Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > Suspect they have also forgotten about a

> > pedestrian barrier / cattle grid to ensure that

> > offending patrons (e.g. old people and young

> > children) emerging from the darkness of the

> cinema

> > into the light of the street are prevented from

> > causing unnecessary traffic disruptions.

> >

> Actually if you'd bothered to visit the

> presentation or view the photo of the proposed

> scheme posted above you'll see the pedestrian

> barriers which are already there will stay,

> probably for the exact reason you've stated.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The pedestrian barriers on the pavement are likely

> ot be removed. They're a hangover from when it was

> school 20+ years ago. I had the ones on Archdale

> Road from the previous school there last year.



It has started. . .

Years from now, as alien explorers pick through the wreckage of planet earth, someone will look back at the lost civilisation of Humans and rue the apparently innocuous trigger point for all the terrible horrors that were to follow... the Picturehouse Dulwich.

reddulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For a first film, on one of them they should show

> the Australian film 'The Castle' its about

> development and planning, but more importantly

> someone seeing their home as their Castle, and its

> a great family film too.



Dad, I dug another hole



Since James Barber was one of the prime movers in encouraging Picturehouse to come to ED, this is a pretty mean comment.


E-dealer, I suspect that you won't be voting Lib Dem this Spring (and indeed neither will I), but please try to keep politics out of this and be pleased that ED will probably be getting a much needed asset.

E-dealer, please tell me why James B would want to get the cinema project cancelled when, as I said, he is one of the people who encouraged Picturehouse to come to ED. Or is there some Machiavellian conspiracy afoot that is too difficult for us ordinary mortals to comprehend?


More to the point, why does at least one poster have to post negative messages on EDF when there is for once some potentially good news?

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The pedestrian barriers on the pavement are likely

> ot be removed. They're a hangover from when it was

> school 20+ years ago. I had the ones on Archdale

> Road from the previous school there last year.


What evidence can you back this claim up with, as stated before they are clearly depicted on the artist impression of the completed development. For someone supposedly supportive of the project a statement such as yours is extremely negative and potentially harmful.

reddulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For a first film, on one of them they should show

> the Australian film 'The Castle' its about

> development and planning, but more importantly

> someone seeing their home as their Castle, and its

> a great family film too.



Tell 'im he's dreamin.


:-)

Someone mentioned the pedestrian barriers outside the cinema. I reference the existing barriers on the PUBLIC FOOTPATH are probably going to be removed.


The proposed fencing spelling out Dulwich Picturehouse is part of the proposed cinema. I;d prefer them to East Dulwich Picturehouse but either way they look a nice touch on the drawings exhibited on Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's a disgusting slur against an innocent driver who was probably just on their way to drop off freshly-baked muffins at an orphanage when they had to swerve out of the way of a so-called "cyclist", and anyway traffic lights are just a Marxist conspiracy by Southwark Council to slow traffic down and force people out of cars, so we're all better off without it.
    • Frothy coffee? Not really my bag. A double espresso and a Marlboro Red? It's the breakfast of champions. The only dark drink with a creamy head which should ever be drunk by a man of my age is Guinness. I've also become lactose intolerant recently, meaning I get very impatient around milk. You make a fair point, but those legal channels are available for them to recover their repair, and legal, costs and, as I said: "It's up to them if they [Southwark] want to do that, of course." There's three or four grands worth of Cat N write-off, wrapped round a post there (more, if it's broken down for parts) causing problems. If they can't be arsed sorting that, I'm not holding my breath. Even Southwark couldn't screw their numbers up enough to make shifting the post back through circa 15 degrees more than a couple of grand, so there's a drink in it for everyone. It's a bit 'leany' just now, yeah, but I haven't noticed anyone having to limbo under it to get to Superdrugs. Or, they could make a feature of it. Pisa has made a fortune out of not sorting the underpinnings of their tower. Let's say it's an installation by someone called, I don't know, Bangsy, and it's a physical reminder that SE22 cannot deny its proximity to Peckham, Camberwell & Brixton. It's about the only thing that would get me back into The Bishop since the many dark afternoons of the soul I spent with Clarence*, the world's most depressed Weimaraner. *RIP big fella. You were always a great listener.   Come on Spartacus, don't be shy. You know exactly where the Green Cross Code Man was in 1973: less than a hundred yards away, on North Cross Road. https://youtu.be/C-XwVVMiCO4?si=rt8kQllev0t1Lgdi For some years, I found it quite difficult to go into The Forrester's after many long afternoons of the soul with Dave Prowse* (The Green Cross Code Man). *RIP big fella. You were always a great listener.  
    • Loving the arm chair speculation on here  Blimey how long before this gets spun out to be a drug dealer welding a sawn off whilst driving away from a smash and grab at the coop cash machine flipped his car and landed on a bollard type post  Where's the green cross code man when you need him ? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...