Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a bit odd no?

>

> http://home.bt.com/news/btlife/bt-sport-becomes-of

> ficial-partner-of-manchester-city-11363825447967

>

> A new football broadcaster officially partnering a

> single team?



Very. Sky will be available for free tomorrow... http://www1.skysports.com/watch/news/8851081/sky-sports-kick-off-biggest-premier-league-season-with-free-first-day?DCMP=open_access_toptab_asst

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Liverpool 2 v Stoke 0

> Arsenal 2 v Aston Villa 1

> Norwich 1 v Everton 2

> Sunderland 1 v Fulham 0

> West Brom 1 v Southampton 1

> West Ham 2 v Cardiff 0

> Swansea 1 v Man Utd 3

> Crystal Palace 1 v Tottenham 2

> Chelsea 3 v Hull City 0

> Man City 2 v Newcastle 0


PD, there's now a separate prediction thread, it also has details of how to join the online league which I've set up...

Yeah, how does that work? The BT pundits only say good things about MC? I wonder will the day come where clubs do their own TV deals to show matches here like they do in Spain. I hope not as La Liga is forever a two horse race. It's anyone's guess here between half a dozen clubs.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With injuries already it's a nightmare start for

> Wegner's. some boos echoing round the empty

> library.


Yes predictable chants of spend some money and Wenger out.

Actually I was surprised at how full the stadium was - not empty at at all.

Table does not look pretty - down in relegation section!

Not making excuses - Villa were good - but look forward to seeing some of those refereeing decisions again tonight on MOTD!

Can't understand Swans not starting with Bony -- lots of posession and no edge just waiting to get mullahed by a ManU counter.


Impressively comfortable win at Boleyn (without Carroll too) - particularly in that the Taffs didn't get a single shot on target.


ETA: maybe gooners were confused by the new villa kit images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQjwXDQ8nksGjL3BANHH49NH61Z0lUO7u0_Bh0BMV-omazCnoOa- expect headlines re Wenger being 'checkmated' etc.

I really don't understand what it is with Arsenal but suspect it's more how they "do" their business. Every year held to ransom by a key player, endless protracted speculation and inertia over key targets, anyone remember the nonsense over their signing of Arshavin?


You've got a manager with a degree in Economics and the club is run by a Banker, I think they just frustrate other clubs whilst trying to be a bit clever, forgetting that other organisations will stump up to get the deal done.


Excellent start for the Irons, Great to see Joe Cole delivering on the pitch and great to see his interview technique is as dire as ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...