Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a bit odd no?

>

> http://home.bt.com/news/btlife/bt-sport-becomes-of

> ficial-partner-of-manchester-city-11363825447967

>

> A new football broadcaster officially partnering a

> single team?



Very. Sky will be available for free tomorrow... http://www1.skysports.com/watch/news/8851081/sky-sports-kick-off-biggest-premier-league-season-with-free-first-day?DCMP=open_access_toptab_asst

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Liverpool 2 v Stoke 0

> Arsenal 2 v Aston Villa 1

> Norwich 1 v Everton 2

> Sunderland 1 v Fulham 0

> West Brom 1 v Southampton 1

> West Ham 2 v Cardiff 0

> Swansea 1 v Man Utd 3

> Crystal Palace 1 v Tottenham 2

> Chelsea 3 v Hull City 0

> Man City 2 v Newcastle 0


PD, there's now a separate prediction thread, it also has details of how to join the online league which I've set up...

Yeah, how does that work? The BT pundits only say good things about MC? I wonder will the day come where clubs do their own TV deals to show matches here like they do in Spain. I hope not as La Liga is forever a two horse race. It's anyone's guess here between half a dozen clubs.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With injuries already it's a nightmare start for

> Wegner's. some boos echoing round the empty

> library.


Yes predictable chants of spend some money and Wenger out.

Actually I was surprised at how full the stadium was - not empty at at all.

Table does not look pretty - down in relegation section!

Not making excuses - Villa were good - but look forward to seeing some of those refereeing decisions again tonight on MOTD!

Can't understand Swans not starting with Bony -- lots of posession and no edge just waiting to get mullahed by a ManU counter.


Impressively comfortable win at Boleyn (without Carroll too) - particularly in that the Taffs didn't get a single shot on target.


ETA: maybe gooners were confused by the new villa kit images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQjwXDQ8nksGjL3BANHH49NH61Z0lUO7u0_Bh0BMV-omazCnoOa- expect headlines re Wenger being 'checkmated' etc.

I really don't understand what it is with Arsenal but suspect it's more how they "do" their business. Every year held to ransom by a key player, endless protracted speculation and inertia over key targets, anyone remember the nonsense over their signing of Arshavin?


You've got a manager with a degree in Economics and the club is run by a Banker, I think they just frustrate other clubs whilst trying to be a bit clever, forgetting that other organisations will stump up to get the deal done.


Excellent start for the Irons, Great to see Joe Cole delivering on the pitch and great to see his interview technique is as dire as ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...