Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was me before I went through a wardrobe and then

> returned to being me but in an anagram sort of

> way.



I wasn't referring to you either.


I liked your previous name, kind of cool & mysterious!


What made you come back through the wardrobe?!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, as The Dame would say "Ch ch ch changes,

> turn and face the strange ch ch changes."

>

>

> I don't see the point in changing your username

> unless there is some ulterior motive.


And of course JL yours is a fine moniker, one we've all come to know and love over the years.


But if you want to get off the reggae tip and embrace hip-hop but STILL with a recognisable 'brand' might I suggest L.A.J. Hush?


L.A.J. (Lovin' Always [the] Jack) Hush {Quiet FOOL} - R 'n' R alcoholic drink, and an aggressively A Team based request for silence. While you meditate. Perhaps. Your call.

The way I see it:


If somebody wants to change their username due to threatening messages/troll abuse etc.,that's fine.


But it might be nice if they informed regular posters, who they know are ok, of the change (maybe by PM?)


Just a thought.


Personally, I don't plan to change mine, as I like being me!

but there are so many regular posters AQ, how would anyone remember all of them in order to send a PM?


way I see it, regulars can usually work out pretty sharpish who the not-so "newbies" are. people's posting styles and familiarity with the forum/other posters/local places or events are fairly obvious. most name-changers don't deliberately try to come across as new posters, do they?


(I mean, what sort of idiot puts numbers after their name to help them remember their login name anyway?) :))

what annoys me most about name changers is the "sport" it creates for some forumites who take great delight in figuring out who the "new" person could possibly be and then brag to others (who don't really tend to care) who they are without sharing the information as if it makes them higher up on the social standing of the forum or as if they know a great secret or something. Like seriously!

I just don't play the game :-)


I've never changed my name on this forum but on other social platforms I am known to have a large wardrobe of dresses to choose from depending on my mood.

Choosing the right name can be difficult especially when others adapt your name to however it suits them. For example, under this name I am not particularly fond of being called Kal or Kalam but that's what others choose to identify me as and who am I to argue as it is part of the name I have chosen after all and if I really objected to it I would either say (here does not count) or change it to something I am happy with.

Other times, in other places, I may just not feel like wearing dress X but feel like wearing dress D and so use that one instead.

I have never hidden who I was/am as I don't have anything to hide and really don't see the point in becoming even more anonymous than current online activities allow you to be, although saying that it can be an interesting experiment to see how other regular users respond to what would normally be a new user...

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but there are so many regular posters AQ, how

> would anyone remember all of them in order to send

> a PM?

>




In that case, forget everyone else and just send one to me!


:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...