Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was me before I went through a wardrobe and then

> returned to being me but in an anagram sort of

> way.



I wasn't referring to you either.


I liked your previous name, kind of cool & mysterious!


What made you come back through the wardrobe?!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, as The Dame would say "Ch ch ch changes,

> turn and face the strange ch ch changes."

>

>

> I don't see the point in changing your username

> unless there is some ulterior motive.


And of course JL yours is a fine moniker, one we've all come to know and love over the years.


But if you want to get off the reggae tip and embrace hip-hop but STILL with a recognisable 'brand' might I suggest L.A.J. Hush?


L.A.J. (Lovin' Always [the] Jack) Hush {Quiet FOOL} - R 'n' R alcoholic drink, and an aggressively A Team based request for silence. While you meditate. Perhaps. Your call.

The way I see it:


If somebody wants to change their username due to threatening messages/troll abuse etc.,that's fine.


But it might be nice if they informed regular posters, who they know are ok, of the change (maybe by PM?)


Just a thought.


Personally, I don't plan to change mine, as I like being me!

but there are so many regular posters AQ, how would anyone remember all of them in order to send a PM?


way I see it, regulars can usually work out pretty sharpish who the not-so "newbies" are. people's posting styles and familiarity with the forum/other posters/local places or events are fairly obvious. most name-changers don't deliberately try to come across as new posters, do they?


(I mean, what sort of idiot puts numbers after their name to help them remember their login name anyway?) :))

what annoys me most about name changers is the "sport" it creates for some forumites who take great delight in figuring out who the "new" person could possibly be and then brag to others (who don't really tend to care) who they are without sharing the information as if it makes them higher up on the social standing of the forum or as if they know a great secret or something. Like seriously!

I just don't play the game :-)


I've never changed my name on this forum but on other social platforms I am known to have a large wardrobe of dresses to choose from depending on my mood.

Choosing the right name can be difficult especially when others adapt your name to however it suits them. For example, under this name I am not particularly fond of being called Kal or Kalam but that's what others choose to identify me as and who am I to argue as it is part of the name I have chosen after all and if I really objected to it I would either say (here does not count) or change it to something I am happy with.

Other times, in other places, I may just not feel like wearing dress X but feel like wearing dress D and so use that one instead.

I have never hidden who I was/am as I don't have anything to hide and really don't see the point in becoming even more anonymous than current online activities allow you to be, although saying that it can be an interesting experiment to see how other regular users respond to what would normally be a new user...

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but there are so many regular posters AQ, how

> would anyone remember all of them in order to send

> a PM?

>




In that case, forget everyone else and just send one to me!


:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...