Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was me before I went through a wardrobe and then

> returned to being me but in an anagram sort of

> way.



I wasn't referring to you either.


I liked your previous name, kind of cool & mysterious!


What made you come back through the wardrobe?!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, as The Dame would say "Ch ch ch changes,

> turn and face the strange ch ch changes."

>

>

> I don't see the point in changing your username

> unless there is some ulterior motive.


And of course JL yours is a fine moniker, one we've all come to know and love over the years.


But if you want to get off the reggae tip and embrace hip-hop but STILL with a recognisable 'brand' might I suggest L.A.J. Hush?


L.A.J. (Lovin' Always [the] Jack) Hush {Quiet FOOL} - R 'n' R alcoholic drink, and an aggressively A Team based request for silence. While you meditate. Perhaps. Your call.

The way I see it:


If somebody wants to change their username due to threatening messages/troll abuse etc.,that's fine.


But it might be nice if they informed regular posters, who they know are ok, of the change (maybe by PM?)


Just a thought.


Personally, I don't plan to change mine, as I like being me!

but there are so many regular posters AQ, how would anyone remember all of them in order to send a PM?


way I see it, regulars can usually work out pretty sharpish who the not-so "newbies" are. people's posting styles and familiarity with the forum/other posters/local places or events are fairly obvious. most name-changers don't deliberately try to come across as new posters, do they?


(I mean, what sort of idiot puts numbers after their name to help them remember their login name anyway?) :))

what annoys me most about name changers is the "sport" it creates for some forumites who take great delight in figuring out who the "new" person could possibly be and then brag to others (who don't really tend to care) who they are without sharing the information as if it makes them higher up on the social standing of the forum or as if they know a great secret or something. Like seriously!

I just don't play the game :-)


I've never changed my name on this forum but on other social platforms I am known to have a large wardrobe of dresses to choose from depending on my mood.

Choosing the right name can be difficult especially when others adapt your name to however it suits them. For example, under this name I am not particularly fond of being called Kal or Kalam but that's what others choose to identify me as and who am I to argue as it is part of the name I have chosen after all and if I really objected to it I would either say (here does not count) or change it to something I am happy with.

Other times, in other places, I may just not feel like wearing dress X but feel like wearing dress D and so use that one instead.

I have never hidden who I was/am as I don't have anything to hide and really don't see the point in becoming even more anonymous than current online activities allow you to be, although saying that it can be an interesting experiment to see how other regular users respond to what would normally be a new user...

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but there are so many regular posters AQ, how

> would anyone remember all of them in order to send

> a PM?

>




In that case, forget everyone else and just send one to me!


:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...