Jump to content

Recommended Posts

if requested by the Original Poster then I think that's fair enough


I don't think any topic is off-limits so no expression of freedom is stifled - eg in the Somerfields debate I imagine we are free to bang on about the merits of "justice" as much as we like if we start another thread on that topic. But I can't see anything else being added to that debate so I sure as hell am not going to start it


[ lock request ]


;-)

I don't think the OP has ownership of the thread. sure, it can be frustrating if the thread drifts away from the original topic - but that is just like a regular conversation. If enough people are interested in keeping things going with the topic then it will run.

Different when a thread turns into a slanging match between two posters. That's not nice. still feel it's up to the Forum body to step in.

Sadly locking certain threads goes against my natural sense of the ridiculous:))

A Guy starts a thread like the racial one. A motley crew pile in with diverse opinions and the original poster thinks "Oh! my good gawd! I've created a Monster here!".Gets noivous(as The Americans say) and then mentions that he wished he had never pressed the magic button and started World WAr 3 !B),appeals greatly to my Sense Of Humour I have to say....

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Different when a thread turns into a slanging

> match between two posters. That's not nice. still

> feel it's up to the Forum body to step in.


Quite. This isn't a democracy. Nor does everyone have the "right" to freedom of speech. I spend a lot (too much tbh) of time on here and think the Admin(s) mostly do a sterling job in the anonymous face of adversity. Occassionally I might disagree with certain things but not nearly enough to worry me.


It's quite easy. If you don't like the way the Forum is run, find another. I'm happy so I'll stay.

Don't think Asset was making quite such a strong statement as that, d_c? and I'm sure Admin is man enough to face a question or two.


My view is that threads - especially the more contentious ones - and often run for a while with lots of people pitching in and good discussion, and then end up with one or two pages of a few people angrily saying the same thing round and round, again and again, with the discussion dying painfully by inches. At this point I think it helps the admin if the original poster says "I think we're done here" rather than having to make the call without help.


I agree that the OP doesn't own the thread, but he or she probably has the greatest say. I've never seen anyone come back and say Oi! we weren't done, but I think they would be free to if they wished and then perhaps the thread could be unlocked, in the same way that threads get lounged and then de-lounged.


Or else people could start a new thread, to discuss whatever it was that the old thread had turned into.

  • Administrator

Three threads locked does not make'th a craze.


If someone asks me to lock a discussion they have started because they feel they are getting abuse, have started something that is now pointless repetitive and they do not want to have to continually answer the same questions again and again etc then I will usually lock the thread upon request. It doesn't happen often, probably six times in the last year or so, so it is probably not worth starting a revolution about the management curtailing the freedom of speech.


And it is not about "ownership" of a thread, they are not owned by anyone. They may have been started by someone and therefore I give them bias about their request to lock it but I do refuse requests to lock threads sometimes. But you do not know about these.


I am going to move this thread to the "about the forum" section because it is about the forum.

Gawd, I wasn't throwing any stones, just thought a discussion on the why and wherefores might have been an interesting one.

Obviously everyone's feeling a bit defensive and I'll just crawl off into a corner.


Feel free to lock the thread admin, as I'm the OP perhaps I can request it now.

Got to say that I've never seen a thread locked where I couldn't see why. Sometimes I'd rather have watched things play out, but I can always appreciate why that hasn't happened. But then I've never been cut off mid-rant by a thread being locked, I'd imagine it probably feels less easy to be understanding if you are the one who gets cut off.

David Mc Wrote:

I just wanted to say to Louisa that if she doesn't

really like it here then she could always move to

Tunbridge Wells. Or Bromley. Or Blackpool.

....Can I second that! After all she was probably born in London.Generations of her Family were probably,also, born here and survived The Blitz etc,and lets face it most "indigenous" lol..."Londoners" have long since left Inner London(almost everyone I grew up with,for example) so lets rid the area of the likes of her who,maybe,just maybe,remembers Inner London as a much safer,happier place and resent the overall drop in standards in behaviour and lack of Community now blatantly obvious in most of London generally.In fact,personally I think its a diabolical liberty that the remaining few "Londoners" pathetically cling on hoping for a better days that will,alas and alac,never return..Pitiful! Risible even!.What London REALLY needs is to be rid of the likes of her and her pathetically romanticised old-fashioned views of Stability.She probably thinks "social mobility" breaks up "traditional" Communities,where people continuously come and go! How fooloish1 Its people who come in,"naturally" enriching the area for the 2 years they stay that should be London's future!...BE GONE WOMAN!(6)(6)

p.s Cue for Loiusa to inform us that she has been here for 5 minutes since emigrating from Mablethorpe,Winchester or StanstedMountfichet..:))

I can remember when this forum was just East Dulwich locals having a good time, then outsiders came in from the er, outside and tried joining in the fun but just tainted it with their repetitive "days of old" speeches. Perhaps Admin could ban 'incomers' and make it the peaceful and tranquil island it once was, ok it won't be as big and diverse and progressive as it is now but I don't care because I just have happy memories which will come back to life if I had my way. :)) :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...