Jump to content

Londis, Lordship Lane


Oggy

Recommended Posts

Just picked up from this link that Londis on the corner of Northcross Road and Lordship Lane has put its lease on the market http://www.rapleys.co.uk/property/london-se22-8hu/retail-premises/354/ I find this slightly surprising in view of the fact that the store always seems busy. I suppose there is a lot more local competetion now in the convenience market. This is quite a lot bigger than most other stores on Lordship Lane, which probably rules out another trendy boutique, but not really big enough for a Tesco Express, or Sainsbury's Local type of operation. I will be watching with interest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just because the lease is being sold, does it

> necessarily mean the tenants (londis) are leaving?



Why would they sell the lease then have to pay someone 'Ground Rent' to stay there. ?


DulwichFox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears from the the details I have seen that Londis is seeking to sell its lease held for a term of 15 years from 22 October 2004, subject to five yearly rent reviews at a passing rent of ?72,000 pax, fixed at review with effect from 22 October 2009, for an asking premium of ?100K. This would therefore involve Londis handing over the property with vacant possession to an "assignee", rather than granting a new sub-lease and maintaining its interest in the property
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cora - I have lived locally with my family for 15 years. It has changed a lot. Did you prefer the Lane when it was full of fried chicken shops, betting offices, hair salons and looked like every other neighbourhood shopping street in south London?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oggy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cora - I have lived locally with my family for 15

> years. It has changed a lot. Did you prefer the

> Lane when it was full of fried chicken shops,

> betting offices, hair salons and looked like every

> other neighbourhood shopping street in south

> London?


Can you remind me when this was?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oggy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cora - I have lived locally with my family for 15

> years. It has changed a lot. Did you prefer the

> Lane when it was full of fried chicken shops,

> betting offices, hair salons and looked like every

> other neighbourhood shopping street in south

> London?



Yes, when exactly was this fried chicken festooned race course?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lordship Lane in the early 90s (I moved 1992) was dire indeed and a very depressing place, especially after Sainsburys opened and the greengrocer and butchers (Le Chardon now) closed and Northcross Road was wall to wall hairdressers. I remember when the Blue Mountain cafe opened (1993??) and after that the domino effect began
Link to comment
Share on other sites

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oggy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cora - I have lived locally with my family for

> 15

> > years. It has changed a lot. Did you prefer the

> > Lane when it was full of fried chicken shops,

> > betting offices, hair salons and looked like

> every

> > other neighbourhood shopping street in south

> > London?

>

> Can you remind me when this was?



Exactly, I don't ever remember a Lane full of fried chicken shops. The most it ever had was 2, Favourite, which is still there (and long may it stay), and the speedo pizza place was once a chicken shop. That's it. There were one or two betting shops I'll grant you, and there are probably more hair places now than ever before.


Are you sure you're thinking of the same Lordship Lane?



Shame, because this made me laugh.


Oggy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A chartered surveyor who works as a retail agent.... ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lizzie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship Lane in the early 90s (I moved 1992) was

> dire indeed and a very depressing place,

> especially after Sainsburys opened and the

> greengrocer and butchers (Le Chardon now) closed

> and Northcross Road was wall to wall hairdressers.

> I remember when the Blue Mountain cafe opened

> (1993??) and after that the domino effect began


xxxxxx


I moved to ED in 1991. I didn't find Lordship Lane "dire and depressing" at all!


When was Northcross Road "wall to wall hairdressers"?


If memory serves, there was a butcher, a cobbler, a newsagent, a Greek deli, a greengrocer (still there), amongst other things.


To the best of my recollection there was a barber (still there) and one hairdresser. What were the other hairdressers?


I agree the opening of the Blue Mountain was the start of the gentrification of ED :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this was interesting local gossip. Never wanted to start a debate about the evils of gentrification, or chartered surveyors. Just sorry to have churned up so much simmering resentment. East Dulwich is dead .. long live East Dulwich!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember it as the Tesco way back until it became 7/11 in the early to mid 80s.


Oggy I found this thread interesting too, and am pleased you shared. I just didn't recognise the description of Lordship Lane you gave that's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oggy, I found it interesting and exactly what the

> board is about. Ignore the coal-digging chicken

> eaters and tedious class obsessives.


Nothing to do with eating chicken or class, more a desire for an accurate description of what East Dulwich was like before, well, let's call it gentrification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • LTNs were pushed by the Conservative government (as was ULEZ which you also disapprove of). They were one of several active travel measures which were a condition of the TFL funding settlement post Covid.  £69m of direct borough funding (per year) was also provided to support more localised investment in walking and cycling schemes across the city…but we all know schnapps is a secret commie 🤣 I’ve no idea. I do know that people are covering their plates and driving through, and that’s probably an accident waiting to happen (although clearly down to signage 🤣). The emergency services have agreed the changes, so I would assume that on balance they think it’s the right move. Whilst ‘One’ are suggesting the emergency services have agreed the changes under pressure, they wont say what sort of pressure, or from who 🤔. Perhaps it’s the commies again 🤣😂
    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...