Jump to content

Recommended Posts

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you for nice comments - I blush. Will there

> be a ceremony? If so I'll need a new frock and an

> up-do.

>

> HB - yes I remember your movie. Sadly, George

> Clooney never materialised in SE22, which is his

> loss I feel.


Thanks Giggirl for your support, I shall wear it always. Just a snippet of the sort of snappy dialogue the cinema-going public have been deprived of.

Just to keep you up to date, my spurious wardrobe team are suing Clooney's people for the unreal work they put into the costumes they didn't make for him, in order that he could fully create on-screen the complex and nuanced character that is me.

Somewhere in an illusory warehouse hang a dozen royal blue towelling bath robes. Each artfully stained with marinara sauce.

Such a waist.

Anyhow should Clooney ever show up in SE22, then my make believe staff have been instructed to issue a press release that praises him as an actor and director, while subtly implying that he does himself no favours in having better looking chums such as Pitt and Damon.

That'll teach him for turning his nose up at a project like 'I Scream You Scream We All Scream For Ice Cream'

Perkulator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This simply isnt on, I've gone from Bon3yard to

> 'Perkulator'...all I wanted was a new password!

> Thanks for the praise Shu but I do indeed sport

> Plums. As for wanting to 'go into the kitchen' is

> this a euphamysm for some unsavoury sexual

> practice? ;-)


Not at all Perkulator.

Though in fact if you take 'unsavoury' as meaning sweet, then it could be alluding to a sex act.

'Going into the kitchen', involves blancmange, bottom, nose and thumb.

The nose and thumb are used to 'cock a snook', the other elements are of course involved but I'm going to have to look them up.

  • 4 weeks later...

Not that I don't recognize this wasn't that popular last time (easily as popular as oooooh.... my c30 C60 c90 compilation thread) , but as it's that time of the month, I'm going to nominate for the month of November:














Jeremy



As well as upping his posting frequency, he often has a just-different-enough take on things which he communicates in an unshowy but solid style. To the point where he has become one of those posters where, if he is the last poster on a thread which I wouldn't normally go near I'll have a peek

Thanks SMG.


It's just because I'm bored at work though... so give the award to my boss.


HonaloochieB has a certain way with words... probably gets my vote. I wish Louisa would come back though, I really miss logging on to find yet another strongly-worded comment which has got the whole forum up in arms.

Give to KK then. What the feck do I care. She's been posting long enough. Dedicated follower of the forum and all that stuff. Must want it badly. I met Jeremy last night in the flesh so to speak, albeit briefly and I have to say what a splendid chap he is, so he still gets my vote. Sorry KK and James.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...