Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Applespider Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mwa ha ha!

>

> What about those which are GG - GiGantic! As an ex

> used to quote to me ;-)

>

> I don't mind the word 'boobs' but I do quite like

> using boobage instead of cleavage amongst my

> well-endowed friends.

>

> Words I don't like - flaccid although gusset is up

> there too.



you also forgot size SJ.

Dulwichmum how nice to be graced by your presence on this thread dear. We/I have missed you since you went professional and of course we do not expect so much output from your goodself now you get paid sooooo much for your wordsmithery.


Professionalism is all about money I know to my cost, that's why I don't have much!


Good to have you back.


Hmmm which reminds me I wonder what's happened to MsB she seems to have gone to sleep or away.

ENOUGH!


I shall be forced to slap your bottom Mr Huguenot. And as for the rest of you - I expect to see you personally apologise to Father O'Connor next Saturday morning. If you are not outside that church by 10.30 with a large donation in your pocket - I shall ask the administrator for your address...

HeidiHi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A - Almost boobs

> B - Barely there

> C - can't complain

> D - Damn

> DD - double damn

> E - enormous

> F - fake

>

> Someone told me this yonks ago!




All this talk about size (and ladies it doesn't matter to most blokes despite what is said in the press) and also the increase in bust sizes over the years has lead me to a question from a male point of view


Looking downwards, one wonders if there is also a 'size' scale for the men and their man boobs (or MOOBS) as I have heard them called in the Sunday times Style magazine.


I would suggest (for argument's sake)


OI - Over inflated

PP - Perfect Pecs

FP - Flat Pecs

N - Normal

SF - Slightly Flabby

TB - Training Bra Required

BB - Bigger then your Birds

OD - Oh Dear

C4 - Featured on a documentry about obese men




;-) And I think that Gentlemen, in most ladies eyes and in this context size really does matter and anything over 'N' is going to be too big !!


(Edited to satisfy Moo's desire below)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...