Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm certainly not talking about any of the people

> Rosie earlier mentioned. And I'm definitely not

> talking about the successful people Seabag

> mentioned.

>

> I'm talking about the people that have ensured

> that when I went to look for some new glasses,

> EVERY bloody pair was thick black rimmed.


... Except the bit

> about dressing up as Edwardian gentry (which by

> the way I'd never have labelled hipster - which is

> another example of how no one actually knows what

> a hipster is). I just find that particular group

> of junior right wingers a bit distasteful.


Dude. If your issue is just with spectacles, shouldn't you be berating graphic designers..?


Not sure how you know that you're not talking about any of the people I mentioned. I failed to state that the friends I mentioned earlier also have a penchant for hipster clothes: neon, 80s batwing jumpers, snow-washed denim, assymetric hairstyles, Victoriana and Edwardiana. Not all at once (usually). That would be ridiculous. There are a couple of beards too.


A point that I think has been missed is the way a lot of these trends are born out of a lack of finances. People working in retail / doing the door in clubs to support their street art habit don't have the disposable income to dress head to toe in Gap. Hence second hand clothes and the cheapest frames at the opticians. Then a momentum builds, a trend develops, and suddenly the thick black frames are in the Karen Millen range at Specsavers. Karen Millen (!) - purveyors of synthetic fibres used to denote the Made in Essex type of hard-faced fake-tanned french-manicured strumpet who's no better than she ought to be by wardrobe departments across the land.


Without wanting to labour a point, I'm just saying you can't judge a book by its day-glo cover.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I failed to state that the friends I mentioned earlier also

> have a penchant for hipster clothes: neon, 80s

> batwing jumpers, snow-washed denim, assymetric

> hairstyles, Victoriana and Edwardiana.


Batwing jumpers? I need to keep up here.


Must be tough, being such an individual.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It isn't complicated - if you see a man with a

> well-developed beard that is groomed to within an

> inch of its life- it is on a hipster imvho


So that puts Jeremy Beadle & George Micheal in your 'Hipster' gallery ?


Oh and George Clooney


Hmmm....

Admittedly I can't say with certainty that I wouldn't call the people you're describing as hipsters. Because I lack the psychic ability to know who you were thinking of. I was going by the friends of yours that I've been introduced to, or seen on social media. And by band videos you've shared. Haven't ever seen one of those and thought hipster.


I think you make a fair point about cash flow for clothes, but I disagree that having to buy second hand means you have to dress in a particular way. We all have our budgets (my clothing budget is tiny) and we choose what to buy with it.


I don't judge books by cover, and thinking someone looks a bit silly does not mean I make any judgement about them as a person. But equally human nature means that we're likely to be drawn towards the books that we think we'll enjoy the most.


But again we're talking about different people. You're talking about the people that bought the thick rimmed glasses out of necessity. I'm not.



ETA response to RosieH but started it an hour ago and got side tracked so cross posted.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're talking about the people that bought the thick rimmed glasses out of necessity.


Red herring. That never happened. At no point in my lifetime have thick black rimmed glasses been the only cheapo glasses available.


It's also true that they became fashionable about 20 years ago, long before the word "hipster" had made it across the pond or beards were vaguely cool - or even OK.

I couldn't care less how somebody chooses to dress. If pushed to have an opinion on it, I probably prefer to see people taking risks with how they look, having fun with clothes and being creative. I know...Inevitably people will say "but they're all the same, they're clones", but for a group of people to be different enough as to be clearly identifiable as such, they clearly aren't. It also assumes that those levelling the criticism aren't a like themselves, when quite clearly, by being 'other', they are. Basically, what I'm trying to say (perhaps not very eloquently), is why disparage people for the way they dress? Especially, if they're doing it in a thoughtful, joyful manner (even perhaps with a little irony)?
@Otta - yeah, you're right, it is *mainly* just people having a laugh, but then I remember growing up in a small town where looking a bit different would get you a hard time. Never understood why people cared how others choose to look / live - so perhaps I do have a bit of a humour deficit with this kind of thing. Just reminds me of the kind of parochialism to which London (to my young mind) represented an escape.

I own a Saab.


I am most certainly not a free thinker. I just like the fact that I pretend to be a jet pilot in the Swedish Air Force. *makes jet plane and machine gun noises*


With a barbour jacket and duck boots (http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/fashion-blog/2014/dec/08/ll-bean-duck-boots-five-month-waiting-list) natch.


No beard though. More due to a lack of masculinity than a fashion issue.


I sense I'm falling between some gaps. Help.

Can we stop giving hipsters all this publicity please? The shaggy irony of looking like a tramp and drinking a cocktail out of a jam jar is lost on everyone other than Guardian readers who hope their area of London is next to be "hipsterfied" so that property prices increase.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...