Jump to content

Hipsters


harperama

Recommended Posts

I've posted this before, but I rather liked it, an open letter to hipsters

http://potlatch.typepad.com/weblog/2011/03/an-open-letter-to-the-hipsters.html


If I were to tell you, my dear hipster, that you represent a post-liberal youth movement, you probably wouldn't have a clue what I meant. You have probably never met anyone who wasn't a liberal. You have scarcely heard of The Daily Mail, for which I envy you. Your idea of a conservative is someone who suggests you wear a bicycle helmet. Your boss doesn't even notice your tatoos, which must register as something of a shame. You are so liberal as to not even know it. So what is it you yearn for? What is your equivalent of the 1960s?



Some have suggested it is the 1950s, which is maybe true to the point of adopting various Beat styles and poses. But really, I suggest, it is the post-punk period of circa 1977-84, the years between The Sex Pistols ripping up the rule book, and The Smiths piecing it back together again. And let me go one further, with a proposition that might (or might not) offend some of you: what you yearn for is the fulfillment of the promises of Thatcherism. What frustrates you about Britain (and, for your American progenitors, New York and California) in the early 21st century is the gap between the rhetoric and the reality of economic freedom. You have been seeking to renew economic liberalism, just as baggy and rave renewed social liberalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently they shun the mainstream, so will wear things that aren't fashionable, thus making them instantly fashionable because as you say "being anti-fashion is so fashionable".


It's like music when people won't listen to something because it's too mainstream, so they listen to "underground stuff" which if it's any good, gets popular and mainstream, at which point it shall be cast aside as a "sell out".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay far too sweeping a statement, of course not everything good ends up being picked up and has mainstream sucess, but the gist of what I'm saying remains the same. Some people won't listen to stuff simply because it's mainstream. They ignore the fact that sometimes stuff is popular and mainstream because it's really good. But it's all about being cool and listening to the "right" stuff.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say I quite enjoyed the whole 'chap' thing when it kicked off, what, 10, 15 years ago? Drinking gin and being silly.

It does become somewhat unnerving when it becomes a uniform to follow slavishly, i always found that sort of thing disturbing to be fair.


The closest I've ever got to that is probably a penchant for over-sized wolly jumpers when i was 17, a useful cultural badge when attempting to drunkenly paw at cute goth girls down the local pub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's an older and more monied 'look' going on too, it's going on in the shadow of Hipsterisms bright light. But it's there


Daddy Rockabilly old motor bike/car driving vintage Hipster is my take


Known to feature:

Redwing boots

Selve edge & Japanese denim

Beards

Vintage work wear

Supreme T's

New English work wear, but old cuts

Blue, Kahki, Olive, Denim

Hair/no hair

Tattoos (old and optional)

Specs



Or is this just urbane arty/creative middle agers, flush with ?150 to splash on a pair of said jeans + ?250 on a pair of boots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carnell is also completely vindicated in sporting

> what might at first glance appear to be hipsterish

> cultural identifiers.

> He has of course been wearing them entirely free

> of irony since he could walk!!!



Guilty m'lud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's an older and more monied 'look' going on

> too, it's going on in the shadow of Hipsterisms

> bright light. But it's there

>

> Daddy Rockabilly old motor bike/car driving

> vintage Hipster is my take

>

> Known to feature:

> Redwing boots

> Selve edge & Japanese denim

> Beards

> Vintage work wear

> Supreme T's

> New English work wear, but old cuts

> Blue, Kahki, Olive, Denim

> Hair/no hair

> Tattoos (old and optional)

> Specs

>

>

> Or is this just urbane arty/creative middle agers,

> flush with ?150 to splash on a pair of said jeans

> + ?250 on a pair of boots


Ah man....caught again (sans beard and tats).....I'm just going to live in a potato sack and be done with it.


Heirloom organic potatoes obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carnell is also completely vindicated in sporting

> what might at first glance appear to be hipsterish

> cultural identifiers.

> He has of course been wearing them entirely free

> of irony since he could walk!!!



Absolutely, but the difference is that Carnell doesn't look like he's playing dress up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a fine line between dressing and dressing up, I agree. That includes haircuts and beards etc.


Sometimes I see a gent, usually older and near the city, dressed in the most immaculate tailored clothes. It's a great sight and the details are subtle


But add a cygnet ring and white cuff and collar on a coloured shirt, and were into spiv territory


I'm sure DC is a fine dresser indeed, not a cygnet ring in sight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread was done in 2011....http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,804059,804822#msg-804822


One thing I do like about hipster style is that it's one of the most identifiable stylings of any tribe since heavy metal, punk and teddy boys. If it makes people talk then it's probably a good thing. We cant all be seen in John Lewis Gant sweaters and corduroy. Unless you're the proto-hipster Carnell of course.


I broadly admire the micro-capitalist entrepreneurialism. You could argue the movement has single handedly regenerated the inner urban retail and food scene for the better.


Agree there's a particular type who are annoying....but aren't we all to a certain extent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hasn't every generation since the enlightenment or whatever had their own version of hipsters? Pre-Raphaelites, flappers, beatniks, teddy boys, new romantics and so on. Some of the posters here are probably old enough to have lived through or been part of at least one of those sub-cultures or some other.


Funny to see people on the ED turn their nose up at today's current crop of bearded, skinny jeans and art school "hipsters" - it's partly down to that class of young people that the values of your houses have shot up so quickly and that coffee shops, art house cinemas, spangly new eateries and the likes are popping up around here. On the other hand, that could be all the more reason to hate them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gore Vidal wrote in 1953 of the "Young men with beards wearing blue jeans and open red-checked shirts contrived to look more Iowa than Murger..."


I suspect it's the contrivance that gets people's goats, but I can't help feeling it's kind of pathetic to rail against people half your age (or a third your age...!) on account of what they wear. You sound like my dad when I was 14 and he ridiculed my latest outfit from Afflecks Palace or when I put the Smiths on my record player. Get with it, daddy-o.


Why are espadrilles more offensive to you than box fresh white trainers or nasty short sleeved shirts? There are tribes aplenty in London, and I find it utterly bemusing that art students raise more ire from the impeccably dressed style mavens of the forum than any other fashion gang.


As I thought when I was 14, so I think now - if someone who clearly couldn't give a stuff about their own clothes thinks you're getting dressed wrong, (and what manner of projection is that?) you must be doing something right.


And Otta - "apparently they...", "some people..."? For shame, man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 14 is to be encouraged, at 24 its to be tolerated, in your 30s...seriously, grow up.

It's the older ones that really annoy.


I should add this is not specific to hipsters, a mopey goth who should know better will arch my eyebrows in the same manner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
    • Really?  I'm sorry to hear that. What did you order? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...