Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It shows how out of touch GB and politicians are if they think this slimeball can make things better just because he's a sharp political operator,,


a) He's never done a proper job

b) He's where he is today because of who his family are and bugger all else (also see Milliband)

c) Even the political job's he's done he's been shit at

d) Puke

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4373-mandelson/#findComment-140587
Share on other sites

Dunno really. Not sure what the salary is for running the world's largest free trade area but I suspect it's not even close to the respective private sector role - if you could find one that carried the same weight of responsibility and power.


I can think of far worse injustices in the world of pay packets than Mandelson.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4373-mandelson/#findComment-141259
Share on other sites

Gorgi Osbourne spreads rumours of poisonous comments purring from Peter's lips about Gordy Brown and suddenley Gorgi is under heavy scrutiny from the Media himself,fighting for his Political Life after,purportedly seeking donations from the Russian Billionaire on a ship where one of the other significant people present was....Pierre Mandelson.....meow....

If your facilitating a donation then it is a criminal offence...


Et tu Brute?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4373-mandelson/#findComment-141724
Share on other sites

PM is very very bright and VV competent


He may be a gratingly annyoing slimy charachter, but has more understanding of how the system works & how to get things done that than Eton & Oxford trained PR pisstain Cameron & his shitehawk baying rowing club chums that provide the EZ on the eye opposition

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4373-mandelson/#findComment-141916
Share on other sites

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fettes & Oxford differ how much?

>

>

> PM was a grammar skoolboy IIRC


He is of course a politician whatever, but A chum - who is an arrogant tory ( pseudo ) intellectual - was utterly blown away by PMs grasp of his brief & intellect when , I think, working under him at the DTI


Cameron is undoubtably bright, but is a PR man by trade

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4373-mandelson/#findComment-142035
Share on other sites

Well, as long as he chips in to the coffee fund (and Jean of course will make sure he does), doesn't get pissed up at lunchtime, come back and be 'inappropriate' with Mary, the young intern and buys his round of Friday night on the obligatory office drink up, I can't see what could possibly go wrong for PM in his new role.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4373-mandelson/#findComment-142054
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...