Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i looked at a place up there about 18 months a go and at the time there was one bus i think the 63 or 363 to elephant and castle that went halfway up the road then turned on to underhill. I decided it was too isolated for me as i don't have a car and that if i was going to live that far up lordship lane i would rather live in forest hill and be closer to facilities. There are some gorgeous houses on that road and if i wasn't reliant on public transport i would see things differently.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141058
Share on other sites

The 363 will go right past your house but is not as frequent as the 63 which ends on Forest Hill Road. Forest Hill Road is only a short walk away and so you could pick up more buses there. Also you are not far from the top end of Lordship Lane and can pick up any buses that run down to the bright lights of the strip. As previously mentioned you are very close to the P13 which also runs down to the fun end of Lordship Lane and Sainsburys.


For trains you are probably 20mins walk away from both Forest Hill Station and Honor Oak Park.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141093
Share on other sites

We're at the top of Melford Road so near as makes no odds on Wood Vale.


Forest Hill station is a ten minute walk. Lordship Lane and all its busses are five minutes away. As someone said there's the 363 along Wood Vale. The other end of Wood Vale which can't be more than a decent ten to fifteen minute walk has Forest Hill Road with its bus stops down to Peckham etc.


How connected do you want to be?!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141096
Share on other sites

Transport from the LL end of Wood Vale, where I am, gives you more options that most places in the area.


10 minutes walk to Forest Hill station

15 minutes brisk walk to West Dulwich station

P4 to Lewisham/Brixton

176/185/197/363

P13 just round the corner.


Another benefit is that aside from the P4 (in term time), you'll pretty much always get a seat on a bus in the mornings (as opposed to just struggling to get on it further along LL)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141099
Share on other sites

As a WoodValer AppleSpider's list looks pretty comprehensive - for speed into town the 10 min walk to Forest Hill stn (or cheat and get a bus - it'll always overtake you if you walk I find) gets me to the office by Liv St in 35 mins door to door on a good morning.

I'd say a car is handy for the supermarket run depending on how much you're buying, but that's the same everywhere - you'll have no problem getting yourself to ED or elsewhere without one.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141103
Share on other sites

Transport is a bit rubbish basically. So ultimately it depends whether you're willing to sacrifice convenience for a leafier, quieter area and (probably) more space. I hear there are some lovely big old places up there - much more spacious than your average East Dulwich Victorian terrace conversion.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141129
Share on other sites

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably because people always have a tendency to

> 'big up' the area where they live.


And here was me thinking it was people who have a tendency to think themselves experts on a subject without actually knowing much about it. ;-)


I'll be the first to admit that pubs/shops wise, Wood Vale isn't as good as living down one of the streets off LL but transport-wise in terms of getting to work each day, I don't think it's a poor relation.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141216
Share on other sites

I didn't know that you knew where I and my friends live Applespider! Wonders will never cease...


And do you need a degree to know that the transport there is a bit rubbish compared to further in to East Dulwich?


If you read my post again you will see that I gave a balanced view... face it the transport is not good there. You're further out and further from stations. Payback is that it's leafy, pretty and the houses are bigger. In fact there are some lovely places there.


Still, it's not fair on people seeking balanced advice to distort the truth in order to big up your own area (trying to make yourself feel better?)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141222
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to big up the place James. It's just a genuinely quieter and pleasant stretch of road than being just off Lordship Lane. OK, you can bus it to the station or walk. It's not that far and the little bit of exercise never did anyone any harm. I know it's the only exercise I get.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141225
Share on other sites

James, wasn't meant to be personal but since you said you'd only heard that there were some bigger places up there, it did sound like you weren't particularly familiar with the area yourself. I'm not sure whether you need a degree to know anything about transport - but I have one and I'll continue to disagree with you.


Sure, it's 5 minutes further along from the Plough or 10 minutes along from Goose Green but aside from the 37 if I want to go to Putney, I'm not entirely sure what I'm missing out on where I am. I at least have the option of the P4 to get to/from Brixton and the wonders of the Victoria line which gets me to a point where I can pick up cross-London routes (e.g. to Putney too). The 363/63 gives me a direct bus route to Kings Cross.


I'd rather spend 10 minutes on a bus with a seat in the mornings than standing on LL watching buses go past because they're full. And, let's face it, most mornings the bus situation on the main part of LL isn't pretty. On the majority of mornings, the 185/176 that I'm on at 8ish will ignore several stops on LL or only allow very limited passengers on.


Forest Hill has as good links as East Dulwich station - and West Dulwich offers a direct route to Victoria too. It's not any further to walk down the hill from Wood Vale to Forest Hill as it would be from Franklins to East Dulwich station. In the evenings, I can be home in less than 30 minutes from the West End - that's not 'rubbish' in my experience.


I'm truly not trying to 'big-up' the area as you're assuming. I've already freely admitted that pubs/shops-wise it's a poor relation, but on transport, it's not as rubbish as you're suggesting.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141230
Share on other sites

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If you read my post again you will see that I gave

> a balanced view... face it the transport is not

> good there. You're further out and further from

> stations. Payback is that it's leafy, pretty and

> the houses are bigger. In fact there are some

> lovely places there.

>

> Still, it's not fair on people seeking balanced

> advice to distort the truth in order to big up

> your own area (trying to make yourself feel

> better?)



As a resident of the area I can confirm that all the views above from residents are correct and balanced.


And "You're ... further from stations."? Comedy gold. May I suggest you're further from some, and closer to others? Balanced advice there.


;-) (A little bit)


edited for clarification and accuracy and that..

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141237
Share on other sites

Hello there. As a fellow Woodvalien (Lordship Lane end) I'd just like to agree with Applespider's comments. If anything we have more travel options up this neck of the woods as we have the nippy (yet inconsistent) p4 to Brixton to add to the 363/63/185/176/197. Forest Hill Station is a short walk away and also has a far more frequent service than East Dulwich and will soon (well in a couple of years) have the East London Line. I think, to be honest, transportation into central london can at times be pretty frustrating from anywhere in the ED area - in Wood Vale we can just boast of a greater variety of methods to frustrate you. As a lazy biker my quickest method of transport to the west end is a pleasant cycle through Dulwich park to Brixton and then hopping on the Victoria Line.


As the esteemed Mr.Lush mentions its quieter and greener in these parts - Sydenham woods/Horniman/ Dulwich Park all next door, but you don't have the pubs (until someone turns the Harvester back into a proper pub) and shops. Its a pleasant walk down the hill for dinner though and a hop on the bus back up the hill. And while Wood vale itself doesn't have amazing views, walk round the corner and the whole of London unfolds before you.


We also seem to be a friendly bunch up here too - I've found more passers by say hello/good morning than any other place I've lived in london...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4387-woodvale-road/#findComment-141260
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...