Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brendan, she is a he and a Nonogenarian he at that. He worked under King Edward as an Ambassador to The Duke of York. Married to a Charlotte and unfaithful to her with an exotic type by the name of Desiree, Nicola his housekeeper and Nadine the Landlady of The Pentland Javelin. Its no (Golden) Wonder his heart gave out one December morning whilst he was feeding his Roosters. ;-)

Clarkson: 500 complaints and counting


Interestingly, we're talking 188 complaints before it received any internet or press coverage. Which, in comparison to the 2 for 'Bross', makes it 94 times 'actually more offensive' to people who were, you know, 'actually more offended'.


However seeing as the joke was only at the expense of murdered prostitutes as opposed to national institution and all-round good egg Manuel Sachs, it's unlikely that the fallout will be the same.

I?m seriously considering starting a campaign to get people to write into the BBC and complain about them doing nothing but publishing articles about people complaining about things.


It?s a bloody disgrace I tell you. I don?t pay my licence fee so that I can logon and read stories about neurotic pensioners complaining about fat men in tight trousers taking the piss out of prostitute murdering lorry drivers.


Signed

Disgusted of East Dulwich

Another bl**dy publicity stunt. This is the problem with the BBC it all has to be 'entertainment' the only thing they are interested in are viewing figures. Not what they are actually broadcasting. Clarkson (sorry Jeremy) making sick jokes is about as bad as it gets. I want my money back.
Oh gawwwd I can't believe I'm coming back to this again...and therefore risking the rather weak line from some on here (many of whom I consider my best virtual friends) that i'm an anti BBC,Mail reading, malvolian, b*stard for finding Russ & John's behaviour not a joly post modern jape......if Brand and Ross had just joked about the Russel Brand sleeping with the Vampy one that might not have been that funny and a bit tasteless but could be branded as humour (a la Clarkson)....to leave a series of, let's be honest, pretty unpleasant personal messages on someone's answer machine is a very different thing by my personal compass

bon3yard Wrote:

Hear, hear, bring back The Black & White Minstrels!


Don't say that! Think about their leader, one George Mitchell.

It was "George Mitchell's Black and White Minstrels"...trouble is George used to constantly argue with th Minstels,due to his nervous disposition,b4 they took to the stage.


They later discovered that George suffered from severe Pre-Minstrel Tension:-$

Quids - for getting "malvolian" in there I doff my cap sir


And it gladdens my heart (if I had one) to hear you vigorously deny such charges - and I would agree that what happened was not simple "jolly japes" - it was juvenile and distressing but what was missing from the general discourse (and I'm not talking about you, or this forum even) was perspective. Andrew Sachs handled himself well (and will be appearing on a Jon Ross chat show at some point in the future I will wager, knowing full well that jolly japes will be involved) and I see the graddaughter has said she went too far herself. Essentially, left to the proper channels, the grown ups involved would have apologised, shaken hands and moved on. Jobs did not need to be lost (and it's not just the Brand/Ross jobs - it's all the production people in their companies down the food chain)


But when the Mail does crank up it's machine, it doesn't really matter whether you read it or not - it has behaved far more reprehensively than any of the cast in this and it needs opposition. (where was it's concern for the elderly when it was doorstopping Brand's mother just weeks earlier? What was the point in publishing transcripts if they were so offensive - including non-broadcast material?). And yes I hear you, you aren't a Mail reader etc but if we must get indignant let's look at the whole picture


Ditto to tens of thousands of people still ringing in to the BBC to complain AFTER the jobs had been lost and/or people suspended, for something they neither were aware of, nor heard.


As for Clarkson - let's not judge him on the material he broadcast this week. Let's look at his whole body of work. And then condemn him ;-)


But he's not as bad as Littlejohn, I'll give him that much

As a result of aforementioned S.I.T. (squib in teacup) Auntie Beeb have decided to continue in their fine tradition of over-reacting at the highest possible level to the most insignificant of incidents.


BBC Wizz-Exec Mark Thompson says: "I think we are heading towards a period where it is probably the case that we will be able to secure the best entertainment talent for less".


So that's all the heats of 'World's Strongest Man' filling-up the summer primetime schedules then.

Sean, not sure I can agree with your post when you say 'Essentially, left to the proper channels, the grown ups involved would have apologised, shaken hands and moved on'


Once things started to get out of hand - and yes they certainly did - Andrew Sachs backed off and said - OK, enough, I've had my apologies. By that point I think anyone with any taste was feeling pretty nauseated by the whole thing.


But in the early stages - back when Andrew Sachs (or at least his agent on his behalf) was still hopping mad - the first apologies were insincere and openly mocking. "Sorry. But it's still funny" smirked Brand. I really can't believe that the much humber, more personal, more straight-faced apologies that did eventually arrive were anything other than a response to being in serious trouble.


Your other points are that the Mail is scuzzy and inconsistent (I can't disagree) and that you don't like Clarkson. But it doesn't detract from the point that Quids was actually making, which was focused solely on the behaviour of the protagonists.

Mind you, all this hasn't damaged Brand's reputation too much, his concert at the Brixton Academy on 10th Feb is sold out, and nearly sold out for the 11th, not that I'd go see him though I was hunting for Prodigy tickets for 17th April for London Arena, then discovered Brixton had two dates for the Prodigy, completely sold out, London Arena have seated only and sold out on standing tickets,(somewhere at the top of the arena where you will prob not see much and down in the crowd is where I wana be dancing away), when the hell did they go on sale? its so unfair! standing tickets selling on ebay for ?70 upwards, groan!!!!!


:'(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sure, ChatGPT never ceases to amaze.
    • Chatgpt is a joy (and scary)  No Water on Barry Road" (to the tune of No Woman, No Cry) (Verse 1) No water… on Barry Road No water… on Barry Road Said, I remember, when we used to flow In the tap by the old front gate Oba served us clear, sweet water Then it vanished like fate And then the plumber would come in the evening Fixing pipes, sayin’, "Just hold tight" But every time we checked the faucet It was still a dusty fight (Chorus) No water… (no water) On Barry Road (on Barry Road) No water… yeah On Barry Road (Verse 2) I see the buckets lined up outside Hope in every pail we hold The sun be blazing, the kids be crying And the kettle’s running cold Good friends we had, and good friends we lost To the drought along the way In this bright future, we can't forget the past But we sure need water today (Chorus) No water… no flowin’ tide On Barry Road… we stand and sigh No water… but we still survive On Barry Road… we still try (Bridge) Oh, dry days will pass, I know Pipe dreams gotta start to flow But until then we wait and pray For rain or trucks to come our way (Final Chorus) No water… (no water) On Barry Road (on Barry Road) No water… no pride But still we rise… (It refused to sing it for me) 
    • Hubby had to retire from work due to serious ill health which had meant he was off work for several months at a time. His hospital consultant advised part time employment only, Signed on at Job Centre and asked them to send him on courses, especially IT has not computer literate or had a computer. Job Centre refused and insisted he applied for full time work even though he produced medical evidence from hospital and letter from previous employment detailing the reason why had medically retired him. He applied for the (then) disability allowance but was refused as not disabled enough and the fact he could work part time. Applied f or several part time jobs but when they knew of his medical history turned him down. That was 18 years ago. Disabled people who want  to work find it hard to find employment. I studied Disability and Employment in Holland as part of my degree and found at that time, the Dutch system more flexible. If a disabled person found a job part time, they still received a portion of their benefit as well as wages. If found a full time position, benefit suspended and were subject to regular reviews as to how they performed in  the job. If there were no problems, benefit was withdrawn, however if they found the work was not suited to their disability - they gave up work and went straight back to receiving their full benefit. If a disabled person finds employment, their benefits stop immediately. If they cannot maintain the work and are sacked, getting back onto benefits is very difficult, Give those who are able to work at least part time, the opportunity to have reduced benefits to top up wages.
    • Trickle of cold water this morning, but by 3 pm we have both hot and cold water with normal pressure, Hopefully this will continue.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...