Jump to content

any women with a career, own money and no kids in dulwich!?


Recommended Posts

Im 30, a woman, no children (yet) and have a career so not quite 'in my 20s' anymore and to be honest with you I dont quite see the problem if we were overrun with mummies and babies (not that we are), Im outta ED at 7.30 and dont get back til 7.30pm so I dont even see these families you speak of because I can assure there arent loads of mums and babies in the pubs after dark and to be honest even if they were it would affect me living in ED, this is the craziest thread Ive seen on here in a long time..


How odd..


Long live ED and all of its beautiful inhabitants..


Azul - dude you always seem to make me laugh with your posts!!

Strawbs, I didn't say there was a problem with mummies and their children. But, I don't have a 9-5 job and do work at home or outside so it's important to me to know if there is anywhere where there's other adults about in ED during the day as just seems to be children and their mums. Obviously you've not been looking at the forum if you think this is the craziest thread! If you're out ED 12 hrs a day, how do you even know if it not overrun with the like!? Surely the no. of baby shops and classes advertised is a sign. There's more activites catering for the 0-5 age bracket than the 20-35!
Don't disagree with you, Tillie. But if a person only wants to be friends with a particular demographic perhaps the best way to ask the question is directly. I enjoy having friends with all sorts of different lives, but then I'm old and dull and have children, so what do I know?

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Obviously you've not been looking at the forum if

> you think this is the craziest thread!

>

> Yeah, Strawbs, get back in your box, you newbie.


hey Moos - yep that's me all nice and shiny!! ;-)


Angela - 'There's more activites catering for the 0-5 age bracket than the 20-35!' I think you've answered your own question and possibly ED just isnt the place for you so good luck and go forth and find the right place to live, hopefully its just not near Barry Road!!

angela2711 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

But, I don't have a

> 9-5 job and do work at home or outside so it's

> important to me to know if there is anywhere where

> there's other adults about in ED during the day


ED is full of loafing, self-employed (ha!) adults who have nothing better to do than sit at home (or outside) on their thrombosed bumholes posting away on the internet and waiting for the pubs to open.


Join us. You'll fit right in.

I love living in Dulwich and accept it for what it is. When I have spent time at home during the week, the whole place is very different to the ED I know in the evenings and at weekends.


A prime example is Dulwich park. Before I goosed my knee I used to go running early in the morning before work. The only people you'd see were other dog walkers and runners. Head down there around 11am and it's a completely different story. I avoid the place at all costs at these times.


Don't get me wrong kids are great, I was one once, but I'm not really a children person. I'd just rather not be surrounded by them, so avoid places where I know they'll be. There are plenty of options in this area.

Just the heading to this threat is annoying in itself: "own money" .. I had, and still have my own money thank you very much darling - so get back in your box one that one!


But i will say that i'm expecting my first sprog and I will soon have to eat my words as I agree that I'm always dodging prams in Dulwich and it can get a little annoying as you're always having ot watch your step.

I've been in Dulwich for years and there's definitely been a change in my opinion (as small and insignaficant as it may be!) the prams have definitely doubled, if not tripled .. but then again it has changed the whole neighbourhood with all these new faces .. so it's not so bad.

I think the annoying thing is that money is mentioned at all. As if it?s important whether or not someone has it and if it?s ?their own? or not?


Anyway this thread is starting to bore one.


Someone pm me when it?s degenerated into knob gags.


EDIT to get rid of erroneously inserted smiley

You have every right to ask whatever question springs to your mind. I was commenting on the way in which you asked it. If you read it back you will see that it's kinda alienating and unfriendly IMO. I'm sure you'll find lots of people like yourself and lots of different people. Chill out and enjoy the area for what it is....diverse.

Regardless of how I feel about mummies (yummy or not) or their sprogs (some well behaved and lovely some vile and wild) these are ladies who tend to support the local environment as they shop and seek entertainment locally. I live outside of East Dulwich and there are less mummies with a disposible income around and businesses really seem to suffer because of it, businesses that would thrive in ED because of a healthy day trade. Once I was allowed a day off work, so I had a potter round ED and it was bustling. On a night you have a different crowd and ED seems to offer a healthy mix of normal pubs and what I would deem "style bars", that latter with a little nose wrinkle.

D (30, crippling career, lots of own money, in need of impregnation)

i definitely think it's about time a village for singletons was created .. that would be fab .. i'm desperate to off load all my single mates (girlfirends) .. actually that sounded wrong and i meant it in the nicest way as they are fab girls and would bring happiness to any man, and not change them, just enhance them (my partner falls for that everytime - i love it!)

and then there's the hockey boys .. my partner trains the local teams .. and they're just as desperate for some companionship .. so i gather them all together and we're now one big happy family .. but unfortunately they misread the script - no one got it on!! life's just not that simple is it - i never did like match making .. now i know i'm useless at it too.

but anyway, there are loads of single people in Dulwich and a good vibe all round so just chill and enjoy it - you'l be suprised

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...