Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...

I've just heard that Southwark council have compulsory purchased a grade II listed building in Kennington Park Road to stop it falling into disrepair and I was wondering if anything came of the above discussions to get a campaign together to save the LL concrete house. Does anyone know?


Tom, SLP

Sorry Mockney, I might have caused some confusion - the council's not CPOing the concrete house, it's saving one in Kennington Park Road. I was just looking for anyone who is still trying to save the LL house and wondering if anyone thought this might be a bit unfair.

I walked past today and noticed that there is a public notice from the council up, dated 12 September and saying that they have received an application for planning permission to demolish 549 Lordship Lane, which is a grade 2 listed building, and put up 6 self contained housing units (which I?m assuming is developer speak for flats.)


It went on to say that the council are of the opinion that planning permission should not be granted.


The reference if you want to write in for or against is 07-AP-0705.


Personally I?m neutral. It is a lovely building but it is literally crumbling and there is shoring up to stop it from falling down. There is also too little housing of a liveable standard in this city and we can use all we can get. Although I would hate to see another ugly block of flats go up.


Ideally I would say they should redevelop it but by putting up a building of equal attractiveness as an homage to the original and not pollute our senses with anymore of this dross that is peddled as architecture. (This is just me being opinionated and cantankerous.)

I saw a SLP article a few years agot that said that the house was Grade I listed not II. This is because it is the earliest example of a house made from concrete. It would make a wonderful project or maybe we could make it a community project if we could get grants etc. There are so many talented people in ED I'm sure it is possible....


Also, I don't understand why Southwark can't serve the purchase order on the owners "agent" as the owner is uncontactable.

The house is getting worse day by day...


Like I've said before I'd be heartbroken to see it go.


I and my entire family would do everything in our power as LL residents to make sure the house doesnt get demolished. However my building grandfather reckons it's beyond repair and has been for about ten years.


We at my household would be very interested in saving the house (if it is even possible anymore). How would we get started? I'm sure there's enough people in ED that want to save it.


I've already lost my favourite Soho cafe to developers, I don't want to lose my favourite (albiet derliect) house go too.

OK, if anyone decides to get going on this here are some organisations that may be useful:


Victorian Society

1 Priory Gardens, Bedford Park, London, W4 1TT; Telephone: (20) 8994-1019; Fax: (20) 8747-5899; Email: [email protected]; Internet: http://www.victoriansociety.org.uk/; Aims to preserve the finest Victorian and Edwardian architecture, and to study the art and built environment of the period; makes suggestions to the Dept of the Environment for bldgs to be added to the statutory list; judges applications for listed bldgs to be demolish or altered;; represented at public inquiries on preservation of bldgs.


London Society

Mortimer Wheeler House, 46 Eagle Wharf Rd, London , N1 7ED; Telephone: (20) 7253-9400; Email: [email protected]; Internet: http://www.londonsociety.org.uk/; Founded: 1912 to encourage a wider concern for the beauty of the capital city, the preservation of its charms and the careful consideration of its development.


Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings

37 Spital Square, London, E1 6DY; Telephone: (20) 7377-1644; Fax: (20) 7247-5296; Email: [email protected]

Internet: http://www.spab.org.uk/; Founded: 1877 by William Morris to prevent the destruction of old buildings and to advise on their conservative repair through courses, campaigns, etc.


Also, perhaps less likely to offer direct assistance but may be interested/helpful none the less:


Architectural Association (Inc.)

34?36 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3ES; Telephone: (20) 7887-4000; Fax: (20) 7414-0782; Internet: http://www.aaschool.ac.uk.

Right, my sister has just told me she went in to Southwark's planning office this afternoon to see what was happening, as she lives very very close to the house in question.


The proposed plans are to build a new place similar to the other house they've built behind the concrete house. So keeping with the old style rather than building a square block of flats. She said it actually looked quite nice.


To be honest, if it's that or nothing, I'd go for that.


However, if they get 3 complaints/reservations, they will hold a meeting with those people.


The thing about Southwark not being of the opinion that it should be demolished is just some thing they put on all notices of this type.

If something was going to be done about this formerly glorious building it should have been done at least 20 years ago. Unfortunately it looks completely beyond repair and should be demolished and replaced with something similar in style, like the facsimile beyond it.
I have to agree, the time to save it is now long gone, the proposals sound ok to me actually, and as keef rightly says, it's better that than nothing at all. I dont think the new house will be built to the same high standard, but as long as it looks similar thats the best we can ask for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...