Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thank god for that! (insert winky thing to indicate I?m being frivolous (insert red gurning thing to indicate my mirth at my frivolousness(insert beer clinky thing to indicate that I?m a jolly chap and mean nothing by it(insert sunglasses thing to indicate how cool my poignant post makes me feel)))) (insert winky thing once more just in case I offended someone and because it sounds a bit rude) (insert grinning thing to indicate the hilarity of my joke)

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You laugh now, Brendan, but just wait. Without

> winky smileys, WWIII will erupt on the Forum in no

> time, as the irony-blunt folk of ED fail to get

> each other's light-hearted comments.

>

> I jest, of course. ;-)


xxxxxx


Many a true word, Moos, is spoken in jest :)

Old Peculier - Pah! A quick glance on Wikipedia (which I am assured is 100% reliable !) confirms my suspicions - Theakstons is part of Scottish & Newcastle and now presumbably Heineken.


*Puts CAMRA hat on and advocates support of small regional breweries and untied pubs*

Trouble is it's not the same people who make it. An extreme of this is San Miguel which is brewed here under licence and utter pants compared to the real thing from Spain. It's a pure marketing device and nothing to do with taste or 'real' ale. It's like Youngs is not brewed at Wandsworth anymore, so how can it be Youngs??
Your correct TheePope. Theakstons split in two. Two brothers I think had a disgreement and split the brewery. Old Peculiar, although still a very fine pint isn't quite as it was years ago before the split. BlackSheep is actually a lot like Old Peculier used to be.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your correct TheePope. Theakstons split in two.

> Two brothers I think had a disgreement and split

> the brewery.


True - but the original Theakstons was Owned by Scottish & Newcastle but is now independent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...