Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I live about 100 yards from that blue line, and until these threads started banging on about aircraft noise I never noticed it, now I do.


Thanks.


As it happens I'm with Jah Lush and not disturbed by it at all, but if I was then I'd know who to thank.

  • 3 months later...

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I miss the good old days when concord used to fly

> over, she was noisy but I always rushed out to

> watch her and didn't mind the noise :-)

>

> Fazer, I have to ask, did you fly to your contract

> ?



See my previous posts.

For the Record


The noise we are currently experiencing has only been with us since December 2012.


PRIOR to December 2012.


We had the occasional fly over and Concord ..... We didn't have a jet every 2 mins 40 seconds ...



THAT is why I now have a problem with the noise ..... ie because prior to December 2012 we didn't have it. !

2012 ??Sorry to disagree fazer71 but we have lived in East Dulwich since the mid eighties and had dogs since early ninties which meant a morning, lunchtime and early evening walk on Peckham Rye every day. Planes were coming in to Heathrow on average about one every 1 - 2 minutes. In fact on the evening walks when it was dusk you could see them queueing up from all angles with the landing lights on. A fascinating sight - I once counted 11 waiting to go in to the airport. Noise - modern planes are much quieter than they used to be . Concorde was always noisy but easy to forgive as it was such a beautiful sight. We have never been bothered by the noise. As I have said before - take a day trip to West London and listen to planes taking off over Windsor, Slough etc. People living to the West of the airport have a much worse time of it.

Great filming,well now I know where they are headed constantly over our house we right on route now I know why so many some low enough to see airline name.

Kinda used to them helicopter red hemmes.ambulance and police at 12-2am is worse much lower with big spotlight sometimes.

wolis


I believe the flights were 1 to 2 miles further north still visible from peckham rye as they flew over the Thames but since 2012 they have moved 1-2 miles south.


It only takes a mile or two different to impact a previously unaffected neighbourhood.


Dulwich park is now afflicted where it was previously a quiet sunny day relaxation zone.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another Lovely Sunday Ruined !

>

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxnNQX1vDQU



honestly you need to get a directional mike. I couldn't hear a thing over those stupid cheeping birds and the occasional passing car.

johnie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fazer71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Another Lovely Sunday Ruined !

> >

> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxnNQX1vDQU

>

>

> honestly you need to get a directional mike. I

> couldn't hear a thing over those stupid cheeping

> birds and the occasional passing car.


I guess you're closer to peckham than Dulwich park and LL.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I miss the good old days when concord used to

> fly

> > over, she was noisy but I always rushed out to

> > watch her and didn't mind the noise :-)

> >

> > Fazer, I have to ask, did you fly to your

> contract

> > ?

>

>

> See my previous posts.

See your previous posts for what ?

wolis Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Concorde was always noisy but easy to forgive as

> it was such a beautiful sight.



I so miss Concorde. Such a beautiful plane.


I could forgive all the plane noise if we still had Concorde going over - at around 5pm if memory serves.


But we don't, so I can't :(

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fazer71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I miss the good old days when concord used to

> > fly

> > > over, she was noisy but I always rushed out

> to

> > > watch her and didn't mind the noise :-)

> > >

> > > Fazer, I have to ask, did you fly to your

> > contract

> > > ?

> >

> >

> > See my previous posts.

> See your previous posts for what ?


An answer..

Your line of questioning is rather odd.

Oh yea I'm part of the problem .

We are all part of the problem the whole of humanity is part of the problem..


Aircraft prior to Dec 2012 did not fly as far south over Dulwich as the have post Dec 2012.


I know as I remember clearly hearing busses hitting a pot hole on Lordship Lane early in the morning back then there was no aircraft noise!


I don't hear the Busses, as the pot hole was fixed road resurfaced .....


I do hear Jet Aircraft roaring overhead from 4.30 am then from 7.30 am one jet after another every few minutes.


I remember relaxing in Dulwich Park reading a book on a sunny summer day and there not being any aircraft or aircraft noise above me, now it's constant aircraft ever couple of minutes.


The air is now constantly filled with the drone of jet aircraft it was never like that NEVER!



IT is a recent problem.

I flew Prior to Dec 2012 back then in ED there was no aircraft noise, other than Concord.

How do you explain that was it because I only flew Concord ??? Your logic would make that the answer. Derrrr..

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


Prior to Dec 2012 back then in ED there was

no aircraft noise, other than Concord.



Mental.



Anyway, I'm enjoying the law of diminishing returns in evidence on your 'aircraft noise' threads though. You've certain beaten any potential interest out of most of our 30,000 readers on this one. Good effort!


The next thread could well just be you talking to yourself. IF YOU CAN HEAR YOURSELF OVER THE PLAAAANE NOOOOOOOISE.

Edited for accuracy .. ;)



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's not forget Fazer's wise words on the Dulwich

> Estate thread: 'the market will decide'*

>

>

>

> Oh yeah.. *except when it comes to planes

> flying over my house

>

>

>

> So a massive hypocrite - as well as a mentalist.


Charming Personal Attack and Name calling and out of context quote


thank you

I have lived in ED for the last 26 years - in that time I have not noticed any great changes in numbers or frequency of planes, sometimes there are more, sometimes less in the sky.


They do not bother me, nor do they have any particular impact on my life - such as disturbing sleep, interfering with normal conversations etc.


I live under what used to be the Concorde 6.00pm flight path. That didn't worry me either (the noise well compensated for by the beauty)


I am sorry for anyone who (clearly) suffers from some level of hyper-sensitivity to plane noise - but I see no call to change the world on the back of that. I have suggested here before that there are psychological remedies which might allow those suffering to alleviate their distress (which I am not suggesting is not a real distress).


Sometimes it is more effective to change yourself than to change the world (and often easier as well).

I couldn't agree more with what Penguin has said. I've lived here for almost 40 years, and, apart from when Concorde used to fly overhead, could count on one hand the number of times when I've found aircraft noise intrusive. But even the noise from Concorde was hardly a problem, and as others have said, it was easy to forgive. I'm always baffled when I see people complaining about aircraft noise - I think it is fairly minimal compared to areas closer to major airports.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fazer, do you think the problem is that the volume

> of air traffic has increased and needs to be

> curbed? Or that planes are being

> disproportionately routed over this part of

> London? (without mentioning the obvious third

> option..)



I believe there has been a change in the route aircraft take into Heathrow, and prior to Dec 2012 they flew a couple of miles further north over the Thames where now they fly over ED.


Previously Saturday and Sunday morning lie ins I would wake up hearing birds singing and the occasional car, now every Weekend it's constant aircraft drone from 4.30 am and the bird song is nowhere.


I have lived in the area for over 20 years and it is something which simply wasn't here prior to Dec 2012.


The fact a lot of people don't notice it or have become accustomed to it isn't a surprise, some of us are more sensitive to noise than others.


100% certain it is a new phenomenon, a huge problem for me I am really struggling with the impact, on what was previously a very happy life I had living in ED.


Nothing about me has changed I went out of the uk to work for several months and when I came back something was different I couldn't initially figure out what it was but after a while I realised it was a new noise,, aircraft noise a noise which wasn't there before.


I remember hearing Concord passing over once a day it was loud but that was the only aircraft noise which was noticed ..... now it's like a very slightly quieter Concord every couple of minutes.


The only conclusion I have is that the flight path into Heathrow has changed otherwise I would have noticed all the aircraft as well as Concord back before Dec 2012.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...