Jump to content

Back in ED and the Aircraft Noise is worst than EVER !

fazer71

By fazer71
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

Applespider

Applespider

Posted
Posted

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looking at

> http://www.flightradar24.com/51.46,-0.17/13#./12?&

> _suid=141276998360509226923015083177

>

> Today is quiet westerly landing have resumed and

> they are flying over the Thames so ED almost ZERO

> noise

>


As I said last night, today (until 3pm) they are using 27R and its approach is a km or so north of 27L - so, yes, it will appear as if it's more along the Thames. They are using 27L tonight... and the planes are flying directly overhead bits of ED as its approach corridor is further south than 27R. There's really no mystery here. In days gone by, you must have inadvertently timed your visits to Dulwich Park with them using 9R/L or 27R. Now you're unfortunately synched with when they're using 27L and so you are noticing more planes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jctg

jctg

Posted
Posted

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recording taken this afternoon near Dulwich

> Library.

>

> Volume isn't precise it's not actually as loud as

> the recording but it gives an idea.

>

> And that particular Aircraft was faster than most.



I live in Nunhead and I don't think I ever hear planes that loud. That sounds like Hounslow or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burbage

Burbage

Posted
Posted

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recording taken this afternoon near Dulwich

> Library.

>

> Volume isn't precise it's not actually as loud as

> the recording but it gives an idea.

>

> And that particular Aircraft was faster than most.


Are you sure it wasn't a 176?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fazer71

fazer71

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sweptwind Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fazer, I'm guessing you're aware what's causing

> the Airbus warble.

>

> http://www.euractiv.com/sections/aviation/small-be

> autiful-how-tiny-device-cuts-aircraft-noise-303505

>

>

> Apparently Lufthansa and Air France are in the

> process of installing these devices to their A320s

> to silence the wailing. BA not so keen

> (apparently).



Thanks for that I didn't know.


I hate that noise it cuts through everything .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
TheArtfulDogger

TheArtfulDogger

Posted
Posted

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah I'm back in ED and yep still

> droooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

> nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ing aircraft .

>

> :(

can I suggest staying where you have been for the last month plus to stop you Hearing the noise and so that we don't have to listen to you droaaaaaannnniing on :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted

Blackcurrant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> From Brixtonbuzz:

>

> London City Airport proposes to re-route major

> flights over Brixton

>

> http://i62.tinypic.com/mj7bqb.jpg

>

> link:

> http://www.brixtonbuzz.com/2014/10/london-city-air

> port-proposes-to-re-route-major-flights-over-brixt

> on-with-little-public-consultation/


So (to be somewhat mercenary for a minute) does this the noise over ED will be worse or better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hpsaucey

hpsaucey

Posted
Posted

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fazer71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ah I'm back in ED and yep still

> >

> droooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

>

> > nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ing aircraft .

> >

> > :(

> can I suggest staying where you have been for the

> last month plus to stop you Hearing the noise and

> so that we don't have to listen to you

> droaaaaaannnniing on :-(



So why keep reading the thread? I'm seriously interested. Is it a 'guilty pleasure' or does it really irritate you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fazer71

fazer71

Posted
  • Author
Posted

hpsaucey


It's a simple case of moronics.


1. The urge to comment on a thread with meaningless irrelevant statements.

2. An urge to tell others how they should think, what they should how they should feel and what they should be saying / doing.

3. A lack of understanding of other people issues and problems.

4. A complete failure in common sense.

5. A desire to be seen as important or funny by making fun of others problems or simply belittling others points of views or issue concerns etc.

6. An inflated sense of their own importance vs other.

7. A moronic Ego.

8. A dead area of the brain which blocks logical thought.


moronics is a growing problem Artful has a bad case which has been developed over many years through a combination of genetics reading online illogical drivel and having lived in a fantasy online community where the members are unwilling incapable or unable "due to also being morons" to correct moronic comments / posts.


moronics is difficult fix, as it become embedded in the ego the sufferer is unable to see it makes them look foolish and stupid.


And we all suffer the constant nonsense it causes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blackcurrant

Blackcurrant

Posted
Posted

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blackcurrant Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > From Brixtonbuzz:

> >

> > London City Airport proposes to re-route major

> > flights over Brixton

> >

> > http://i62.tinypic.com/mj7bqb.jpg

> >

> > link:

> >

> http://www.brixtonbuzz.com/2014/10/london-city-air

>

> >

> port-proposes-to-re-route-major-flights-over-brixt

>

> > on-with-little-public-consultation/

>

> So (to be somewhat mercenary for a minute) does

> this the noise over ED will be worse or better?


The flight path seems to pass over southern and central SE22,but I'm not sure what the current flight path is so I don't know if it's worse. It could change the Heathrow flight path, but the City flights can be noisier as they're lower and turning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fazer71

fazer71

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The city flights are way less intrusive smaller aircraft which fly over faster and less frequently.


Heathrow is the problem big lumbering whistling jets every 2 mins 40 seconds whining and groaning droning constantly one after the other on the same path.

From 4.30 am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Siduhe

Siduhe

Posted
Posted

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The city flights are way less intrusive smaller

> aircraft which fly over faster and less

> frequently.

>

> Heathrow is the problem big lumbering whistling

> jets every 2 mins 40 seconds whining and groaning

> droning constantly one after the other on the same

> path.

> From 4.30 am.


My experience is very different. Every low flying noisy flight that has woken me up is a late-running London City flight. It may just be where I am, but they seem much louder and jarring especially the prop planes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
James Barber

James Barber

Posted
Posted

But it will get a whole lot worse.

EU rules to modernise flightpath technology are being lazilly implemented or proposed to be implemented. London City Airport are proposing to use new technology that means aircraft will much more accurately follow pre planned standard flight paths. So it means much more intrusive noise for people close the centrelines - some have dubbed it 'noise ghettos' will be created.

This is compunded b Lnodon City Airport having agreement from Tower Hamlets Council to icnrease flgihts from 80,000 to 120,000 per annum.

27% of the time the flights paths for London City Airport fly over Easy Dulwuch, Dulwich, Herne Hill, Brixton Battersea. The fly between 3,000-2,000 ft during their descent.

So a real problem, that will be magnified and dramatically increased.


If you oppose this then do respond to the public consultation - I've put the various links:

http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2014/11/12/2769/#page-content

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fazer71

fazer71

Posted
  • Author
Posted

James thanks for that.


I still believe that 90% of the aircraft noise we suffer comes from Heathrow bound aircraft.


City Airport flights are currently far quieter and way less frequent.


Proof of this is evident when following live satellite flight data.


Heathrow is THE problem!




We must not get sidetracked by city airport. !

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fazer71

fazer71

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fazer71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > whining and groaning

> > droning constantly

>

>

>

> Wait, are we still talking about the planes here?



Errr yes absolutely.


Have a good listen...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...