Jump to content

Mum shocked by 'dogging' exploits - SLP 13 April


Recommended Posts

Clearly the Forum is becoming a must visit for all sorts of journalists - see page 7 in today's SLP.


To give you a flavour:


"Writing on the East Dulwich Forum one mum said "Oh My God.""!


and: "DulwichMum wrote: "These people are filth. They should be boiled in oil and have their children confiscated by social services.""

SLP - call that journalism?

If all these people can muster as news is picking up banter from a website, they are sadder even than I had thought.

Actually, Marina Hyde in The Grauniad is just as bad - quoting material from political gossip websites and claiming it as her own.

OHMYGOD! I just read the article, and it reads as though I am completely seriously saying that these people should be boiled in oil! Ha, ha, ha!


I wonder if they will put in a quote from me soon, mentioning how I intend to ship my current au pair home to Lithuania in a crate - have they no sense of humour?


I mean, everyone knows that au pairs must pay for their own transportation home, if she chooses to travel by crate - who am I to argue?


DM

Perhaps, in future, if anyone decides to make any lighthearted comment - in jest - on the forum, they should always follow it up with " - JOKE!!!!" so that those of limited intelligence (and any Americans who might be reading) might not be unduly mislead.

>>I actaully said that line here on the forum - so I am sure they can do what they like! Shame, I could do with a 100 guineas. I could do with a spray tan...<<


of course you did - how could I forget? But still...plagiarism is plagiarism, inetllectual property is intellectual property :))


Spray tans are so "Footballers' Wives" though....

Ohmygod, never again! James says I was loud and larey (do you spell it that way?). I am so sorry if I talked too much or offended anyone, I was out of control. I have a huge black footprint on one leg of my white jeans - what could have happened there? Also, I seem to have lost one of the heels from my peep toe shoes!


DM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Crikey, £4 plus does seem excessive for one card, let alone twelve at that price! Did he explain why he wanted to spend so much? There could be many reasons. Did the recipients also send expensive cards? If so, rather than putting them in the recycling bin, you could just cut the handwritten bit off and send them to a different relative the following Christmas!
    • Does anyone have one they no longer need? Thanks 
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, North of East dulwich station is not covered by the Dulwich Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) Suburban requirements.  And 1978 was before this guidance was agreed.  Hi Jenijenjen, We have vacant sites and sites that for certain heights would likely become available. Giibs & Dandy vacant builders yard - neighbours I've spoken to of this site are extremely concerned about what the council may now approve. Kwik Fit, Goose Green Trading Estate instantly come to mind as sites where tall buildings would bring a significant offer to the freeholders to see the sites up. The Southwark Plan treats Giibs & Dandy + Kwik Fit as one site suitable for residential redevelopment. It also lists the Trading Estate for this as well. See page.84 https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf Do you think developers having seen the council approve a 9 storey redevelopment are more or less likely now to seek the same at other East Duwlcih locations?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...