Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not a big Big Brother fan. And please forgive me this thread. But I flicked on C4 tonight hoping to see the super Swede stunner I fondly recalled from my student days. And got a bit of a shock.


Yes it's ten years later. And we all age. Hey thats cool. And looks beauty is skin deep anyways etc. And I was hoping for some graceful wrinkles.But has anyone else noticed there is something really weird about her face now? I think its the cheeks...but can't put my finger on it - can anyone else?


And while I'm at it, what about La Toya Jacksons nose? She is looking like ET with long hair. Or her brother Michael. Is this all plastic surgery in action? Whats wrong with ageing gracefully?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4856-ulrika-jonsson/
Share on other sites

zephyr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ulrika - I think she has been Botoxed (sp?).


Quite the reverse - mrs.number5 and I settled on the single adjective of "jowly"



DISCLAIMER: MR & MRS NUMBER5 ARE NOT, NOR WILL THEY EVER BE, WATCHING CELEBRITY BB. TUNING IN TO THE LAST 5 MINUTES OF THE OPENING SHOW TO SEE WHO'S IN JUST OUT OF PATRONISING CURIOSITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE WATCHING. THANK YOU.

So what nonenties did you notice in there BN during your 5 minutes worth?

The Ladyfriend I'm visiting tonight likes nothing better than seeing many people she does not know or will ever meet chat pointlessly about nothing at all so I'd better prepare myself(!)

If you saw Ulrika on Shooting Stars last week you would have really had a shock. All panda eyed make-up and epitomising the look of the old trollop she is.


Really harsh man!


I watched Shooting Stars last night (recorded it), and thought she looked pretty good at 41. I also don't know why she has such a bad rep as a tart, what did she do that was so bad?


So she has kids by different dads, so fecking what?!?

But how does that make her different from nearly any other celeb, or person you could mention? Everone loves little Kylie, and she's had a fair few fellas.


Chat to your average 41 year old woman (or man for that matter), and the majority of them (especially ones that hadn't been married) will have had a few partners in their time. Nout wrong in that at all.


I am not a massive Ulrika fan, but I do hink she has had a lot of really harsh treatment just cos she's had a few boyfriends.

I dont see what all the fuss about her is really, granted im not from this land so only have limited knowledge but as far as I know she has had 4 kids by 4 dads but is a good mum and very open about her history.. not quite sure why she gets crucified for that..


ho hum...


oh and NO WAY will I be watching the BB.. I hear in Australia its been banned, lets hope the rest of the world follows suit!

Despite my aforeposted jowly remark, i thought she was looking good on her years, and naturally so, sans botox, surgery etc.


As for the judgement on her personal life, i don't give it a great deal of thought, but she is a part of a special club of famous ladies with entry requirements as follows: if they weren't famous, social services would (post Climbie-Report) be keeping an eye, but they're famous so hello/heat mag can do it instead. Other members include the infamous Katona woman.


I'm not suggesting that there's anything wrong with having 4 kids by 4 fathers per-se, it's just an observation of an apparent imbalance as alluded to by Mockers.


(edit for typos)

Er, quite - think you answered your own point there, Mockers.


Re: Shooting Stars, did anyone else laugh till they nearly peed at the Simon Cowell / bear whathavetheygotincommon? Other than that, it was a bit of a sigh-inducing trip down Memory Lane.. and like dear old Viz just not nearly as funny as it used to be?


edit to say ffs, what's that BN5? Why would social services be involved? Social services get involved when you don't feed/wash/generally take care of your kids.. anyone accusing Ulrika of that??

Didn't want to make this about social standing, but don't think the mere fact she's a celebrity has anything to do with anything. The fact is, she chose to have her kids, and she can afford to care for them, good on her. Noone has mentioned the 4 dads who have left the mother of their children alone again once things looked like getting serious!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...