Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yeah, don't be mean

>

> welcome CYPRIOT TURK - people are making funnies

> because your posting was all in upper case (which

> is kind of like shouting in forum speak) - don't

> worry about it



Thanks for the advice and welcome.

Shame others are not as nice and wecoming.

Hello and welcome CT.

You obviously didn't get karter.

I'll do my best to get a photo of him to you, so that if he is ever in your ward you can do that whole replacing-the-rectal-thermometer-with-a-daffodil-up-the-arse that they did to James Robertson-Justice in that film.

What was it again? The Seventh Seal?

Anyway I reckon there'd be 34 nurses in Dulwich.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hello and welcome CT.

> You obviously didn't get karter.

> I'll do my best to get a photo of him to you, so

> that if he is ever in your ward you can do that

> whole

> replacing-the-rectal-thermometer-with-a-daffodil-u

> p-the-arse that they did to James

> Robertson-Justice in that film.


I doubt Karter would be on my ward, as i am a gynaecology nurse. LOL

But you never know. :)

> What was it again? The Seventh Seal?

> Anyway I reckon there'd be 34 nurses in Dulwich.

CYPRIOT TURK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hello and welcome CT.

> > You obviously didn't get karter.

> > I'll do my best to get a photo of him to you,

> so

> > that if he is ever in your ward you can do that

> > whole

> >

> replacing-the-rectal-thermometer-with-a-daffodil-u

>

> > p-the-arse that they did to James

> > Robertson-Justice in that film.

>

> I doubt Karter would be on my ward, as i am a

> gynaecology nurse. LOL

> But you never know. :)


So you'd be in a better position than most to tell him to stop acting the...you know maybe sometimes it's best to emulate the British Charles Bronson and just not finish a sentence.

There used to be lots of nurses in ED, working at both Dulwich Hospital, King's and further afield. They often shared flats or houses quite locally, anytthing from two to six per property, or lived in the Nurses' homes at Both Dulwich & St Francis Hospitals. I'd be surpised if many can still afford to do the first, and the second is now impossible as the Homes have been demolished.


So actually the question is a damned good one....:'(

Hmmm, I guess it would depend upon what kind of nurses were covered by the description.


The Royal College of Nursing has 49,000 members in London covering a population of 6 million. This means they're on average of 0.8% of the total population.


Apply this to ED ward's 5,000 residents and you'd come to around 40-50.


However, as SimonM pointed out, we've got a couple of hospitals nearby and we're comparatively middle class and cheap compared with some of our neighbours. We've also got some dedicated housing.


I wouldn't be surprised if they were 4-5 times higher than average - 200 or more?


Would it be on the census?

I know dozens of nurses who live in East Dulwich, and some of them can even afford it, imagine that!


We have a good bus connection from West Dulwich to St Thomas's Hospital, rail links from East and West Dulwich to Guys and Lewisham hospitals and a large hospital at Kings and East Dulwich. There is large a health centre on Townley Road (base for district nurses and health visitors) and many GP practices (practice nurses). There are schools of nursing and midwifery at Southbank and Kings College Uni (also good rail and bus links). The base for NHS direct is in Beckenham (http://www.citylifeltd.org/uploads/gallery/Huw_Edwards.jpg) - also great rail links.

Well there's a nurse in the flat next door to me and another two doors up. Assuming this sequence is repeated throughout ED, I reckon there's at least 10,000 nurses in these here parts. In fact there must be a lot of firemen living here too because I'm one and I know there's one other in my road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If it was limited to a couple of days a year, so we all knew, that would be fine. In the last few years (and it is a recent thing) you get random fireworks going off any time after dusk for half the year. It does more than cause problems for pets and wildlife- it can mean lasting damage and massive expense and hassle for pet owners. All because some get a buzz out of loud bangs.
    • Ohh dear.  Fireworks can be great fun.  Where I used to live the kids would have firework wars/games.  Watching them was more enjoyable than watching  TV. (Which you could hardly hear due to the pops and bangs).  It's not like anyone/anything could stop them. I would still prefer organised public displays that are affordable.   And I agree that fireworks cause problems for wild life, pets and people.   It seems to be one of those things that just happens so we have to put up with it.  But it is still not as problematic here as in other areas in London - that's for sure.
    • I made sure to set off a few today just to rile you guys up 😇😂 Always looking for something to criticise 
    • Ugly...maybe..does it bother me..NO! I think its somehow reassuring to see theres still phoneboxes around. East Dulwich may  be getrified but there may well be some elderly people who don't have mobiles and kids who may have lost theirs adults ditto etc etc. I'd rather keep it than lose it...just because i don't use it does'nt mean its not needed.  there are many eyesores in the modern world not all of them as potentially useful.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...