Jump to content

EDF Drinks - tonight Friday 6th February - Black Cherry


Recommended Posts

Thank you Georgia. Blinding evening (literally), excellent collection of forumites and possibly the best venue so far IMO. I don't know you Angela but, if you're reading this you should be very proud of such a fine establishment. Cheers.

just put two and two together... got my go slow w/e brain on, so it was that Georgia (first person I met with Jenny at my first EDF drinks...) who fixed it, got it now!!!


brilliant, good choice of venue, lovely evening, thanks for organising it

xcc


georgia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Great night, good to see everyone and to meet some

> new forumites. Many thanks to Angela as well.

So I want to know (as I couldn't be there yet again)


Did anyone "Get Karter" (or did he get anyone) ?


Did any Ladies join the "Miles and More" Harem ?


Was Chuff "Chuffed" with the evening ?


Did Woofmarkthedog turn up to bark at people (I have a nagging feeling that he/she is barking mad you know)


and finally is anyone red faced with shame ?


Maybe next time I will have to make the effort and come along

I was chuffed LuvPeckham and I managed to bundle Miles into a corner but he escaped. I also did 'get Karter', I went to knock for him on the way to see if he wanted to come out to play.


No shame for me and I cured my shyness, everybody was lovely


bet there was for some though?

LuvPeckham Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So I want to know (as I couldn't be there yet

> again)

>

> Did anyone "Get Karter" (or did he get anyone) ?

>

> Did any Ladies join the "Miles and More" Harem ?

>

> Was Chuff "Chuffed" with the evening ?

>

> Did Woofmarkthedog turn up to bark at people (I

> have a nagging feeling that he/she is barking mad

> you know)

>

> and finally is anyone red faced with shame ?

>

> Maybe next time I will have to make the effort and

> come along



Hey Luv, the campaign against Miles at the Cherry had fallen at its knees.He is too good, too slippery. He wins. Next time though you will be coming along to the drinks, we will be knocking at your front door too . Look out for that 'knock'.;-)

karter Wrote:

>

> Hey Luv, the campaign against Miles at the Cherry

> had fallen at its knees.He is too good, too

> slippery. He wins. Next time though you will be

> coming along to the drinks, we will be knocking at

> your front door too . Look out for that

> 'knock'.;-)



I ain't done nuffin if anyone nocks, if its the rozzers hide the shooters up the back passage and deny everyfing call my lawyer and tell 'im to get dawwn to peckham nick before me like


However if it is opportunity knocking then that is entirely a different kettle of fish and of course I am in to entertain such a lovely caller "more tea Mr. McVicar ?"


PS Karter - don't worry I have plans for our Mr. Miles and it may well involve the supporting structure for the new Elephant and Castle development... however may just take a few years yet to implement....

I think the camera was set to Zoom in Chuff, so pretty close. I would say from top of forehead to chin give or take an inch. I didn't take loads though as big Andrew accosted me after 5mins and took it back..

Has that left you worried? Sure you probably look great..

I wasn't there. So none of me either.

It's bad enough with the paparazzi permanantly parked outside my house and having to avoid their camera flashes but whenever I go to an EDF piss-up there's Andrew with his zoom lense. Click click click! Flash, flash!. "No pictures please, ask my agent."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...