Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This "friend" of yours, did she administer secretly like? One minute the chap is quietly eating his soup, his lovely friend gazes at hin coquetishly and the next thing you know they are at like demons on the dining room table?


or did I dream that....?

A word of warning. DON'T USE IT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IF YOU DON'T NEED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Me and some mates tried it when I was at uni for a laugh and a laugh was far from what we got. You get the most steel rigid boner you can possibly imagine and it lasts about 12 to 16 hours and after about 2 hours of having a constant lob on it becomes a very painful nuisance. Avoid it until your doctor suggests it and your partner demands you use it. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED LADS!

You took medication that you didn't need and it did what it's s'posed to do, only more so because you didn't need it? I wonder if there's any way you could have foreseen such an outcome?


This is only marginally more worrying than the fact that you and your mates thought it seemed like a good use of an evening to sit in and get wood together...

an ex of mine's best male friend took it... his girl friend did not like the results, at first it was just fun/funny but then he had a hard on for 24hrs and she said the whole 'thing' became a bit freaky and they could not go out, not even to the local shop/pub etc as it was so bloody obvious! eekkk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • we actually need growth. It may be counter intuitive, but we need investment.   my example is about poor financial management, be it personal or central. I'm referring to poor government financial management.
    • This is to conflate household budgets with government budgets. They are very different things  a large part of the anger felt across the country is the decline in public services after a decade and a half of austerity.  You cut more you get more ugly anger  Of course people need to be persuaded to pay more - but that is only realistic path. You cut more you will find out the hard way 
    • The question marks are far poore
    • I think one could argue that degrading public services / infrastructure is what's led to our current, slow economic decline. We've spent 14 years trying austerity, and it's proven counter productive to growth and productivity. A successful economy and society needs good transport, education and early intervention health care. On taxes, it depends how you target them. Tax funded spending may be a positive fiscal multiplier. Taxes on work aren't great, or when they hit the poorest (who tend to spend most of what they earn, boosting economic activity). We need a well designed wealth tax (on idle assets), and stronger measures to target avoidance. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...