Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sherry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think a nice bed and breakfast/ boutique hotel

> pub type business would be of much more use... But

> I imagine the investment needed for that puts the

> idea out of the running... But wouldn't it be

> nice!?


Thats whats happening to the Crown and Greyhound in Dulwich village

Callie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a shame if they are going to pull it down.

> Such a grand building & landmark. It would be

> great as a pub restaurant, something like the old

> harvester or weatherspoons.



That's precisely where it fell short on its most recent incarnation. I'd like it how it was in the 60s and 70s with three bars and a great restaurant. A massive garden with an outside bar attached too. Doesn't look like that is going to happen now though, which a shame. RIP The Grove Tavern.

RIP the Grove Tavern indeed. Such a shame the Dulwich Estate are selling this great landmark pub. Also sick to death of every single site in the area being jumped on by local councillors as places to stick schools. I've avoided these topics to date but if I hear one more mention of a bloody school replacing every single brown field site in the area I will run through the streets naked screaming. You don't want to see that, trust me, so please shut the #%$? up about schools replacing valuable historic community assets like the great Grove Tavern.


Louisa.

RIP indeed. Would have been fabulous as a good pub with interesting beers, good food with a BBQ/smoker/pizza oven out the back and rooms above.


All we'll be left with is a disembodied voice on the buses announcing the Grove Tavern stop... until TFL rerecord something generic like 'Dulwich Common'


...of course, if retail opportunities means a Waitrose, I'll obviously retract my RIP and demand they demolish it asap

Louisa,

Yes, of course children need schools, but it is beginning to feel like short term thinking at its worst, especially when you consider that Harris girls is now trying to change its remit so that instead if taking children from the local area it will open its doors to children from all over London and beyond. It does feel like every scrap of land, if not being made into flats or a supermarket, will be earmarked for a school.


Perhaps councillors have a vision for ED, as the school capital of London, replete with cycle routes in every direction and a handy supermarket on every corner.

I got sent a voucher for food from stone gates pubs this week to use I'm the grove! Got very excited for a moment thinking it was a sign that it was re opening but having walked past today- obviously not. Can't believe they are still advertising it when it's been closed for so long.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa,

> Yes, of course children need schools, but it is

> beginning to feel like short term thinking at its

> worst, especially when you consider that Harris

> girls is now trying to change its remit so that

> instead if taking children from the local area it

> will open its doors to children from all over

> London and beyond. It does feel like every scrap

> of land, if not being made into flats or a

> supermarket, will be earmarked for a school.


It does strike me that councillors are responding too late to the need for primary schools and will be doing the same with regards secondaries in the next couple of years. Why so reactive all the time. Everyone can see the impending secondary school shortage, but we're caught up trying to bolt the proverbial primary door after that horse has bolted.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The same could be said for pubs, which are closing by the minute.


Depends. Pubs away from the high street are struggling, and I'm not convinced this location could ever really be viable again (unless it was really something special). But in better locations, it's a different story... two new pubs currently under development on Rye Lane...

The location is a two fold problem. It's on the junction of two busy roads which make it almost impossible for people to navigate here at certain hours of the day. Secondly, footfall is very low indeed coupled with the fact residential streets and housing aren't slap bang on the door of this place. If it were turned into a go to destination pub with good food beer selection and possibly hotel too it would stand a fighting chance. Not many people are prepared to that risk it seems.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> steveo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The same could be said for pubs, which are

> closing by the minute.

>

> Depends. Pubs away from the high street are

> struggling, and I'm not convinced this location

> could ever really be viable again (unless it was

> really something special). But in better

> locations, it's a different story... two new pubs

> currently under development on Rye Lane...



I know Antic are opening one on Rye Lane but what's the other??

reds Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > steveo Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > The same could be said for pubs, which are

> > closing by the minute.

> >

> > Depends. Pubs away from the high street are

> > struggling, and I'm not convinced this location

> > could ever really be viable again (unless it

> was

> > really something special). But in better

> > locations, it's a different story... two new

> pubs

> > currently under development on Rye Lane...

>

>

> I know Antic are opening one on Rye Lane but

> what's the other??


Melon Road, Peckham (the turning almost directly opposite Burger King).


Louisa.

While we have plenty of pubs in the area, we are limited to good beer gardens, the Rye in Peckham being the only one of any note other than the Crown and Greyhound, which is currently closed. This is a huge opportunity and massive shame. Whilst they are doing a boutique hotel at the G & G they could still do a great pub and B&B on this site (similar to the Victoria on Bellenden) and do a roaring trade due to location on the South Circular and proximity to the schools. Oh if only I had the money!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...