Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Chelsea look formidable. In many ways it's good to see Man City, Arsenal and Spurs all get off to good start as it makes the Title a lot more exciting than for just the Big 3. Out of the 3 mentioned I think Man City will sustain their challenge right through to the end - they simply have too many good players with experience not to make an impression.


I don't think Arsenal are physically strong enough to come through the long winter unscathed both in terms of their traditional graveyards in the North and the fact smaller, frailer players (which Arsenal seem to have packed in their squad) tend to pick up continual injuries. In the meantime, I expect Arsenal to visit Old Trafford on Saturday and rattle a good healthy win and keep their momentum going for another few months.

Lively encounter. I think 1-1 would have been a fair reflecion even though Spurs did it edge it in both play and goals ultimately. I don't know whether that means we should be thinking about being more ambitious or whether Spurs should be concerned that they're nowhere nearthe finished article.


What was Cole thinking though!?

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chelsea look formidable. In many ways it's good to

> see Man City, Arsenal and Spurs all get off to

> good start as it makes the Title a lot more

> exciting than for just the Big 3.



Matt - don't let Atila hear you talking about a Big3.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't they start like this last season..and the

> one before that?

>

>

> Shit, they only managed to put 2 past the Hoops



Good to see that in my absence you've been consistent, as in consistently talking out of your backside.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 3 league titles on the bounce would suggest

> > there's only a Big1...

>

>

> :))


There is certainly only a big1, and that would be the poster of the above qoute.

I'd discount them at your peril Sandperson especially if they turn you over at the weekend. They may not be the finished article yet and with Fabregas out injured things could get a little wobbly for them but I'd never write them off and they've been very impressive so far.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...