Jump to content

Recommended Posts

>>Injury is not in question here Simon. He fell over without being touched to gain a penalty.<<


Wenger contends, and having seen the replay a few times I think he may well be right, that there was contact between the goalkeeper and Eduardo. That being so I think overruling the referee in this instance would set an appalling precedent.

lard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > For those that care... it's the FA Cup

> tomorrow,

> > Dulwich Hamlets v Sevenoaks Town at 3 p.m.

> >

> > If anyone thinks they've ever followed their

> Club

> > on the road to Wembley.. which I have countless

> > times with Liverpool.. I have to say there is

> > nothing quite like following your local team

> from

> > August through all the prelimenary rounds as I

> > once did back in yonder until we reached the

> first

> > round proper and faced the might of Cardiff

> City.

> > Ahhh Hot Bovril in shitty paper cups, standing

> on

> > the touchline and finally losing 4-2.. not

> quite

> > Istanbul but still..

> >

>

> Got all a bit jumpers for goalposts there.

> "Marvellous, wasnit"


Currently showing repeats of the Fast Show on *coughs*..Dave...''Briliant''

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>Injury is not in question here Simon. He fell

> over without being touched to gain a penalty.

> Wenger contends, and having seen the replay a few

> times I think he may well be right, that there was

> contact between the goalkeeper and Eduardo. That

> being so I think overruling the referee in this

> instance would set an appalling precedent.


The contact was after Eduardo did his triple back pike with an inward tuck routine...

Was Rooney already going to ground before keeper made contact? Bizarre own goal to compound matters. Perhaps it's for the better that United won, as Arsenal were otherwise magnificent and winning may have given them an unbreakable confidence for rest of season.


Watched the Liverpool game in a pub in West Kensington and it was rammed with about 100 Reds. Have to say it was a great atmosphere with plenty of singing. I thus knock the Vale on the head!

I'm pretty sure there was nothing wrong with the Rooney Pen. I wouldn't have been suprised to see Fletcher's takle being given as a pen either.


No way there's was any need for all those yellow cards and the Wenger sending off was ridiculous. I thought, all in all it was a well balanced game and a draw would have been a fair result but you just can't legislate for an own goal like that.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SimonM Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > >>Injury is not in question here Simon. He fell

> > over without being touched to gain a penalty. >

> > Wenger contends, and having seen the replay a

> few

> > times I think he may well be right, that there

> was

> > contact between the goalkeeper and Eduardo.

> That

> > being so I think overruling the referee in this

> > instance would set an appalling precedent.

>

> The contact was after Eduardo did his triple back

> pike with an inward tuck routine...



Yes he'd been taking lessons from the ladyboy Ronaldo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...