Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > yeah....question msrk by some 'objective'

> Arsenal

> > supporters...it was a penalty....

>

>

> So we agree Arshavin was clattered and it was a

> penalty.


Ha, ha. Very good.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh get over it. You win some you lose some and

> the

> > referee's decision is final.

> >

> The refs decison wasn't final in the game against

> Celtic was it?


Unfortunatley the referee's decision WAS final Atila - you got the penalty and scored - nothing will change that.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh get over it. You win some you lose some and the

> referee's decision is final.

>

> I gutted about Luca Modric breaking his leg and

> will be out for three months. Spurs will sorely

> miss him. He's what's been making us tick

> recently.



I beleive you are buying Niko Krancjar to replace him Jah. Lazy as fook but undoubtably talented!

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Oh get over it. You win some you lose some

> and

> > the

> > > referee's decision is final.

> > >

> > The refs decison wasn't final in the game

> against

> > Celtic was it?

>

> Unfortunatley the referee's decision WAS final

> Atila - you got the penalty and scored - nothing

> will change that.


No it wasn't final because UEFA stuck their oar in. If the decison had been final we wouldn't be having thse posts on the forum now would we?? FFS!

Well Anna and Matt may or may not agree with me, but having seen the first matches, even the wins, Liverpool need something to happen, to stand a chance of keeping up. Especially now Arsenal are looking better than they have in a while, and Man City and Spurs seem to be genuine contenders to challenge the big 4.


The window is officially shut, but sometimes deals will be announced later, so lets see...

Hmmmm I agree to an extent but I think the main fix can be done by showing more adventure in the tactics deployed - for instance Steve Gerrard is not a striker he is a midfielder. It fools nobody that Liverpool only play with one striker - and even though Torres is arguably the best striker in the world it is too much of a burden on him for an entire Premiership campaign to sustain the performances necessary for Liverpool to be Champions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow I had no idea they give you 5% in perfume for your accommodation. You're right, I need to travel more. 
    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...